Cargando…

How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?

BACKGROUND: Even if total knee replacement has revolutionized the treatment of degenerative knee diseases, the definition of an ideal rehabilitation protocol is still in progress. The aim of this study is to identify the factors that influence the outcomes after early, intensive, hospitalized treatm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dionisi, L, De Gironimo, G, Praino, F, Abinova, G, Averame, C, Gentile, AM, Nante, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833098/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.299
_version_ 1784868183393435648
author Dionisi, L
De Gironimo, G
Praino, F
Abinova, G
Averame, C
Gentile, AM
Nante, N
author_facet Dionisi, L
De Gironimo, G
Praino, F
Abinova, G
Averame, C
Gentile, AM
Nante, N
author_sort Dionisi, L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even if total knee replacement has revolutionized the treatment of degenerative knee diseases, the definition of an ideal rehabilitation protocol is still in progress. The aim of this study is to identify the factors that influence the outcomes after early, intensive, hospitalized treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 2019 on 545 patients admitted to a northern Italy private clinic specialized in post-surgery rehabilitation, which applies a bio-psycho-social-environmental model and individual rehabilitation plans. Data regarding each patient were collected from medical records: age, numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) at admission, days between surgery and the beginning of rehabilitation (DBS). The outcomes were measured as the difference (Δ) between the values at discharge and admission of the Barthel scale (ΔBS), Tinetti scale (ΔTS), passive flexion (ΔPF) and active flexion (ΔAF). We performed a univariate linear regression through STATA, to determine which factors influence the outcomes. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Our sample (69.17% female) was 69.8 ± 9.4 years old. ΔBS was significantly influenced by age (Coef. 0.270, CI [0.173 - 0.367]) and NPRS (Coef. 1.434, CI [0.979 - 1.890]). ΔTS was significantly influenced by age (Coef. 0.024, CI [0.011 - 0.037]) and NPRS (Coef. 0.130, CI [0.067 - 0.191]). ΔPF was significantly influenced by age (Coef. - 0.158, CI [- 0.266 - - 0.050]), DBS (Coef. - 1.047, CI [- 1.401 - - 0.687]) and NPRS (Coef. 1.825, CI [1.333 - 2.318]). ΔAF was significantly influenced by age (Coef. - 0.171, CI [- 0.300 - - 0.042]), DBS (Coef. - 1.150, CI [- 1.580 - - 0.721]) and NPRS (Coef. 2.504, CI [1.928 - 3.080]). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients obtain a higher functional outcome (ΔBS, ΔTS) but lower improvement in range of motion (ΔPF, ΔAF). Patients with higher NPRS at admission obtain an overall better outcome. Higher DBS is associated to lower articular outcomes (ΔPF, ΔAF). KEY MESSAGES: • A better outcome can be achieved if rehabilitation is started immediately after knee replacement. • Pain and age are not factors that impede effective rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9833098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98330982023-01-12 How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement? Dionisi, L De Gironimo, G Praino, F Abinova, G Averame, C Gentile, AM Nante, N Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Even if total knee replacement has revolutionized the treatment of degenerative knee diseases, the definition of an ideal rehabilitation protocol is still in progress. The aim of this study is to identify the factors that influence the outcomes after early, intensive, hospitalized treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 2019 on 545 patients admitted to a northern Italy private clinic specialized in post-surgery rehabilitation, which applies a bio-psycho-social-environmental model and individual rehabilitation plans. Data regarding each patient were collected from medical records: age, numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) at admission, days between surgery and the beginning of rehabilitation (DBS). The outcomes were measured as the difference (Δ) between the values at discharge and admission of the Barthel scale (ΔBS), Tinetti scale (ΔTS), passive flexion (ΔPF) and active flexion (ΔAF). We performed a univariate linear regression through STATA, to determine which factors influence the outcomes. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Our sample (69.17% female) was 69.8 ± 9.4 years old. ΔBS was significantly influenced by age (Coef. 0.270, CI [0.173 - 0.367]) and NPRS (Coef. 1.434, CI [0.979 - 1.890]). ΔTS was significantly influenced by age (Coef. 0.024, CI [0.011 - 0.037]) and NPRS (Coef. 0.130, CI [0.067 - 0.191]). ΔPF was significantly influenced by age (Coef. - 0.158, CI [- 0.266 - - 0.050]), DBS (Coef. - 1.047, CI [- 1.401 - - 0.687]) and NPRS (Coef. 1.825, CI [1.333 - 2.318]). ΔAF was significantly influenced by age (Coef. - 0.171, CI [- 0.300 - - 0.042]), DBS (Coef. - 1.150, CI [- 1.580 - - 0.721]) and NPRS (Coef. 2.504, CI [1.928 - 3.080]). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients obtain a higher functional outcome (ΔBS, ΔTS) but lower improvement in range of motion (ΔPF, ΔAF). Patients with higher NPRS at admission obtain an overall better outcome. Higher DBS is associated to lower articular outcomes (ΔPF, ΔAF). KEY MESSAGES: • A better outcome can be achieved if rehabilitation is started immediately after knee replacement. • Pain and age are not factors that impede effective rehabilitation. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9833098/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.299 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Dionisi, L
De Gironimo, G
Praino, F
Abinova, G
Averame, C
Gentile, AM
Nante, N
How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
title How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
title_full How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
title_fullStr How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
title_full_unstemmed How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
title_short How to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
title_sort how to improve the rehabilitation outcome after total knee replacement?
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833098/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.299
work_keys_str_mv AT dionisil howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement
AT degironimog howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement
AT prainof howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement
AT abinovag howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement
AT averamec howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement
AT gentileam howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement
AT nanten howtoimprovetherehabilitationoutcomeaftertotalkneereplacement