Cargando…

Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review

The link between inflammation and cancer is still an attractive subject of many studies because systemic inflammatory response has been proven to play a pivotal role in cancer progression and metastasis. The strongest relationship between chronic inflammation and cancer development is observed in co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misiewicz, Aleksandra, Dymicka-Piekarska, Violetta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643953
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S391932
_version_ 1784868189674405888
author Misiewicz, Aleksandra
Dymicka-Piekarska, Violetta
author_facet Misiewicz, Aleksandra
Dymicka-Piekarska, Violetta
author_sort Misiewicz, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description The link between inflammation and cancer is still an attractive subject of many studies because systemic inflammatory response has been proven to play a pivotal role in cancer progression and metastasis. The strongest relationship between chronic inflammation and cancer development is observed in colorectal cancer (CRC). The evaluation of ratios derived from the routinely performed inflammatory biomarkers shows limited performances and limited clinical utility when individually used as prognostic factors for patients with CRC. In this review, we would like to summarize the latest knowledge about the diagnostic utility of systemic inflammatory ratios: neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR), and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) in CRC. We focused on the papers that assessed the diagnostic utility of blood cell parameters on the basis of the area under the ROC curve published in the recent 6 years. Identification of biomarkers that are significantly associated with prognostic in cancer would help the selection of patients with a high risk of poor outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9833126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98331262023-01-12 Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review Misiewicz, Aleksandra Dymicka-Piekarska, Violetta J Inflamm Res Review The link between inflammation and cancer is still an attractive subject of many studies because systemic inflammatory response has been proven to play a pivotal role in cancer progression and metastasis. The strongest relationship between chronic inflammation and cancer development is observed in colorectal cancer (CRC). The evaluation of ratios derived from the routinely performed inflammatory biomarkers shows limited performances and limited clinical utility when individually used as prognostic factors for patients with CRC. In this review, we would like to summarize the latest knowledge about the diagnostic utility of systemic inflammatory ratios: neutrophil/lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte (LMR), and platelet/lymphocyte (PLR) in CRC. We focused on the papers that assessed the diagnostic utility of blood cell parameters on the basis of the area under the ROC curve published in the recent 6 years. Identification of biomarkers that are significantly associated with prognostic in cancer would help the selection of patients with a high risk of poor outcomes. Dove 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9833126/ /pubmed/36643953 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S391932 Text en © 2023 Misiewicz and Dymicka-Piekarska. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Misiewicz, Aleksandra
Dymicka-Piekarska, Violetta
Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review
title Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review
title_full Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review
title_short Fashionable, but What is Their Real Clinical Usefulness? NLR, LMR, and PLR as a Promising Indicator in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review
title_sort fashionable, but what is their real clinical usefulness? nlr, lmr, and plr as a promising indicator in colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36643953
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S391932
work_keys_str_mv AT misiewiczaleksandra fashionablebutwhatistheirrealclinicalusefulnessnlrlmrandplrasapromisingindicatorincolorectalcancerprognosisasystematicreview
AT dymickapiekarskavioletta fashionablebutwhatistheirrealclinicalusefulnessnlrlmrandplrasapromisingindicatorincolorectalcancerprognosisasystematicreview