Cargando…

Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study

Different transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols have been tested to improve visuospatial neglect (VSN). So far, methodological heterogenity limits reliable conclusions about optimal stimualtion set-up. With this proof-of-principle study behavioral effects of two promising (uni- vs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorsler, Anna, Grittner, Ulrike, Rackoll, Torsten, Külzow, Nadine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36743202
http://dx.doi.org/10.12786/bn.2022.15.e19
_version_ 1784868247880859648
author Gorsler, Anna
Grittner, Ulrike
Rackoll, Torsten
Külzow, Nadine
author_facet Gorsler, Anna
Grittner, Ulrike
Rackoll, Torsten
Külzow, Nadine
author_sort Gorsler, Anna
collection PubMed
description Different transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols have been tested to improve visuospatial neglect (VSN). So far, methodological heterogenity limits reliable conclusions about optimal stimualtion set-up. With this proof-of-principle study behavioral effects of two promising (uni- vs. bilateral) stimulation protocols were directly compared to gain more data for an appropriate tDCS protocol in subacute neglect patients. Notably, each tDCS set-up was combined with an identical sham condition to improve comparability. In a double-blind sham-controlled cross-over study 11 subacute post-stroke neglect patients received 20 minutes or 30 seconds (sham) tDCS (2 mA, 0.8 A/m(2)) parallel to neglect therapy randomized in unilateral (anode-reference: P4-Fp2 10-20 electroencephalography [EEG] system) and bilateral manner (anode-cathode: P4-P3) and 48h wash-out in-between. Before and immediately after stimulation performance were measured in cancellation task (bell test), and line bisection (deviation error). Significant difference between active and assigned sham condition was found in line bisection but not cancellation task. Particularly, deviation error was reduced after bilateral tDCS (hedges g(*) = 0.6) compared to bilateral sham, no such advantage were obtained for unilateral stimulation (hedges g(*) = 0.2). Using a direct comparison approach findings add further evidence that stimulating both hemispheres (bilateral) is superior in alleviating VSN symptoms than unilateral stimulation in subacute neglect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9833469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98334692023-02-02 Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study Gorsler, Anna Grittner, Ulrike Rackoll, Torsten Külzow, Nadine Brain Neurorehabil Original Article Different transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocols have been tested to improve visuospatial neglect (VSN). So far, methodological heterogenity limits reliable conclusions about optimal stimualtion set-up. With this proof-of-principle study behavioral effects of two promising (uni- vs. bilateral) stimulation protocols were directly compared to gain more data for an appropriate tDCS protocol in subacute neglect patients. Notably, each tDCS set-up was combined with an identical sham condition to improve comparability. In a double-blind sham-controlled cross-over study 11 subacute post-stroke neglect patients received 20 minutes or 30 seconds (sham) tDCS (2 mA, 0.8 A/m(2)) parallel to neglect therapy randomized in unilateral (anode-reference: P4-Fp2 10-20 electroencephalography [EEG] system) and bilateral manner (anode-cathode: P4-P3) and 48h wash-out in-between. Before and immediately after stimulation performance were measured in cancellation task (bell test), and line bisection (deviation error). Significant difference between active and assigned sham condition was found in line bisection but not cancellation task. Particularly, deviation error was reduced after bilateral tDCS (hedges g(*) = 0.6) compared to bilateral sham, no such advantage were obtained for unilateral stimulation (hedges g(*) = 0.2). Using a direct comparison approach findings add further evidence that stimulating both hemispheres (bilateral) is superior in alleviating VSN symptoms than unilateral stimulation in subacute neglect. Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9833469/ /pubmed/36743202 http://dx.doi.org/10.12786/bn.2022.15.e19 Text en Copyright © 2022. Korean Society for Neurorehabilitation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gorsler, Anna
Grittner, Ulrike
Rackoll, Torsten
Külzow, Nadine
Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
title Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
title_full Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
title_short Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Parietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With Neglect Symptoms: A Proof-of-Principle Study
title_sort efficacy of unilateral and bilateral parietal transcranial direct current stimulation on right hemispheric stroke patients with neglect symptoms: a proof-of-principle study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36743202
http://dx.doi.org/10.12786/bn.2022.15.e19
work_keys_str_mv AT gorsleranna efficacyofunilateralandbilateralparietaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonrighthemisphericstrokepatientswithneglectsymptomsaproofofprinciplestudy
AT grittnerulrike efficacyofunilateralandbilateralparietaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonrighthemisphericstrokepatientswithneglectsymptomsaproofofprinciplestudy
AT rackolltorsten efficacyofunilateralandbilateralparietaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonrighthemisphericstrokepatientswithneglectsymptomsaproofofprinciplestudy
AT kulzownadine efficacyofunilateralandbilateralparietaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonrighthemisphericstrokepatientswithneglectsymptomsaproofofprinciplestudy