Cargando…

Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro

Concern about microbial tolerance and resistance to established antimicrobials drives research into alternatives for local antiseptic wound treatment. Precise efficacy profiles are thereby important in the evaluation of potential alternative antimicrobials, and protein interference (“protein error”)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rembe, Julian-Dario, Thompson, Vivian-Denise, Stuermer, Ewa Klara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIMS Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2022026
_version_ 1784868382599806976
author Rembe, Julian-Dario
Thompson, Vivian-Denise
Stuermer, Ewa Klara
author_facet Rembe, Julian-Dario
Thompson, Vivian-Denise
Stuermer, Ewa Klara
author_sort Rembe, Julian-Dario
collection PubMed
description Concern about microbial tolerance and resistance to established antimicrobials drives research into alternatives for local antiseptic wound treatment. Precise efficacy profiles are thereby important in the evaluation of potential alternative antimicrobials, and protein interference (“protein error”) is a key factor. Here, the antimicrobial efficacy of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and miramistin (MST) was compared to the established antimicrobials octenidine (OCT), povidon-iodine (PVP-I), polyhexamethylene-biguanide (PHMB) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Efficacy was evaluated after 0.5, 1, 3, 5 and 10 min against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium and Candida albicans using an in vitro quantitative suspension method (based on DIN EN 13727). To investigate protein interference, 0.3% or 3% bovine albumin was used as the challenge. OCT and PVP-I demonstrated a significant efficacy within 0.5 min, regardless of the microbial organism and protein challenge (p < 0.01). CPC and MST showed no inferiority in efficacy, with only MST needing up to 3 min to achieve the same microbial reduction. PHMB and CHX also achieved significant reduction rates over the tested time-course, yet demonstrated a necessity for prolonged exposure (up to 10 min) for comparable reduction. A protein interference was predominantly observed for PHMB against S. aureus, but without statistically significant differences in antimicrobial efficacy between the 0.3% and 3% protein challenges. All other tested agents showed no relevant interference with the presence of protein. CPC and MST proved to be non-inferior to established wound antiseptics agents in vitro. In fact, CPC showed a more efficient reduction than PHMB and CHX despite there being an introduced protein challenge. Both agents demonstrated no significant “protein error” under challenging conditions (3% albumin), posing them as valid potential candidates for alternative antimicrobials in wound management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9834083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AIMS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98340832023-01-23 Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro Rembe, Julian-Dario Thompson, Vivian-Denise Stuermer, Ewa Klara AIMS Microbiol Research Article Concern about microbial tolerance and resistance to established antimicrobials drives research into alternatives for local antiseptic wound treatment. Precise efficacy profiles are thereby important in the evaluation of potential alternative antimicrobials, and protein interference (“protein error”) is a key factor. Here, the antimicrobial efficacy of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and miramistin (MST) was compared to the established antimicrobials octenidine (OCT), povidon-iodine (PVP-I), polyhexamethylene-biguanide (PHMB) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Efficacy was evaluated after 0.5, 1, 3, 5 and 10 min against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium and Candida albicans using an in vitro quantitative suspension method (based on DIN EN 13727). To investigate protein interference, 0.3% or 3% bovine albumin was used as the challenge. OCT and PVP-I demonstrated a significant efficacy within 0.5 min, regardless of the microbial organism and protein challenge (p < 0.01). CPC and MST showed no inferiority in efficacy, with only MST needing up to 3 min to achieve the same microbial reduction. PHMB and CHX also achieved significant reduction rates over the tested time-course, yet demonstrated a necessity for prolonged exposure (up to 10 min) for comparable reduction. A protein interference was predominantly observed for PHMB against S. aureus, but without statistically significant differences in antimicrobial efficacy between the 0.3% and 3% protein challenges. All other tested agents showed no relevant interference with the presence of protein. CPC and MST proved to be non-inferior to established wound antiseptics agents in vitro. In fact, CPC showed a more efficient reduction than PHMB and CHX despite there being an introduced protein challenge. Both agents demonstrated no significant “protein error” under challenging conditions (3% albumin), posing them as valid potential candidates for alternative antimicrobials in wound management. AIMS Press 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9834083/ /pubmed/36694590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2022026 Text en © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Research Article
Rembe, Julian-Dario
Thompson, Vivian-Denise
Stuermer, Ewa Klara
Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
title Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
title_full Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
title_fullStr Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
title_short Antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
title_sort antimicrobials cetylpyridinium-chloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2022026
work_keys_str_mv AT rembejuliandario antimicrobialscetylpyridiniumchlorideandmiramistindemonstratenoninferiorityandnoproteinerrorcomparedtoestablishedwoundcareantisepticsinvitro
AT thompsonviviandenise antimicrobialscetylpyridiniumchlorideandmiramistindemonstratenoninferiorityandnoproteinerrorcomparedtoestablishedwoundcareantisepticsinvitro
AT stuermerewaklara antimicrobialscetylpyridiniumchlorideandmiramistindemonstratenoninferiorityandnoproteinerrorcomparedtoestablishedwoundcareantisepticsinvitro