Cargando…
Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. METHODS: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standard(recon)). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, short(fixed)) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, short(individual)). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. RESULTS: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standard(recon) = 68 ± 7%, short(fixed) = 71 ± 7% (P = .08), short(individual) = 72 ± 7% (P = .04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standard(recon) = 7.8 ± 3.5, short(fixed) = 10.1 ± 3.7, short(individual) = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P < .001). The best repeatability measures were obtained for the short(individual) protocol (repeatability: standard(recon) = 45.3%, short(fixed) = 41.2%, short(individual) = 31.7%). CONCLUSION: We recommend using the short(individual) reconstruction protocol for improved LVEF repeatability and reserve assessment. Alternatively, in centers with limited technical support we recommend the use of the short(fixed) protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1. |
---|