Cargando…
Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1 |
_version_ | 1784868441175359488 |
---|---|
author | Lassen, Martin Lyngby Wissenberg, Mads Byrne, Christina Kjaer, Andreas Hasbak, Philip |
author_facet | Lassen, Martin Lyngby Wissenberg, Mads Byrne, Christina Kjaer, Andreas Hasbak, Philip |
author_sort | Lassen, Martin Lyngby |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. METHODS: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standard(recon)). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, short(fixed)) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, short(individual)). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. RESULTS: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standard(recon) = 68 ± 7%, short(fixed) = 71 ± 7% (P = .08), short(individual) = 72 ± 7% (P = .04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standard(recon) = 7.8 ± 3.5, short(fixed) = 10.1 ± 3.7, short(individual) = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P < .001). The best repeatability measures were obtained for the short(individual) protocol (repeatability: standard(recon) = 45.3%, short(fixed) = 41.2%, short(individual) = 31.7%). CONCLUSION: We recommend using the short(individual) reconstruction protocol for improved LVEF repeatability and reserve assessment. Alternatively, in centers with limited technical support we recommend the use of the short(fixed) protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9834342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98343422023-01-13 Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols Lassen, Martin Lyngby Wissenberg, Mads Byrne, Christina Kjaer, Andreas Hasbak, Philip J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation using adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be challenging. The short half-life of adenosine and the guideline-recommended adenosine infusion stop during Rubidium-82 acquisition protocol may affect the accuracy and repeatability of the LVEF measures. METHODS: This study comprised 25 healthy volunteers (median age 23 years) who underwent repeat myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) sessions employing Rubidium-82 PET/CT. A guideline-recommended reconstruction protocol was used for both rest and adenosine stress MPI (150-360 s post-radiotracer injection, standard(recon)). For the stress MPI protocol, two additional reconstruction protocols were considered; one was employing 60 seconds data (150-210 seconds, short(fixed)) and the other a dynamic frame window based on the bolus arrival of Rubidium-82 in the heart until 210 seconds (x-210 seconds, short(individual)). We report rest and stress LVEF, the LVEF reserve, and the LVEF reserve repeatability. RESULTS: Differences in the LVEF assessments were observed between the guideline recommended and alternative reconstruction protocol (LVEF stress MPI: standard(recon) = 68 ± 7%, short(fixed) = 71 ± 7% (P = .08), short(individual) = 72 ± 7% (P = .04)), and the LVEF reserve was reduced for the guideline-recommended protocol (standard(recon) = 7.8 ± 3.5, short(fixed) = 10.1 ± 3.7, short(individual) = 10.5 ± 3.6, all P < .001). The best repeatability measures were obtained for the short(individual) protocol (repeatability: standard(recon) = 45.3%, short(fixed) = 41.2%, short(individual) = 31.7%). CONCLUSION: We recommend using the short(individual) reconstruction protocol for improved LVEF repeatability and reserve assessment. Alternatively, in centers with limited technical support we recommend the use of the short(fixed) protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9834342/ /pubmed/35415824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lassen, Martin Lyngby Wissenberg, Mads Byrne, Christina Kjaer, Andreas Hasbak, Philip Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
title | Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
title_full | Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
title_fullStr | Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
title_short | Optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)Rubidium-PET scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
title_sort | optimization of the left ventricle ejection fraction estimate obtained during cardiac adenosine stress (82)rubidium-pet scanning: impact of different reconstruction protocols |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-022-02946-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lassenmartinlyngby optimizationoftheleftventricleejectionfractionestimateobtainedduringcardiacadenosinestress82rubidiumpetscanningimpactofdifferentreconstructionprotocols AT wissenbergmads optimizationoftheleftventricleejectionfractionestimateobtainedduringcardiacadenosinestress82rubidiumpetscanningimpactofdifferentreconstructionprotocols AT byrnechristina optimizationoftheleftventricleejectionfractionestimateobtainedduringcardiacadenosinestress82rubidiumpetscanningimpactofdifferentreconstructionprotocols AT kjaerandreas optimizationoftheleftventricleejectionfractionestimateobtainedduringcardiacadenosinestress82rubidiumpetscanningimpactofdifferentreconstructionprotocols AT hasbakphilip optimizationoftheleftventricleejectionfractionestimateobtainedduringcardiacadenosinestress82rubidiumpetscanningimpactofdifferentreconstructionprotocols |