Assessment of the Effectiveness of Glaucoma Treatment Using MicroPulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients with Glaucoma Who Have Previously Undergone Vitreoretinal Surgery

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using MicroPulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (µP-TSCPC) in patients who had previously undergone pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), depending on the endotamponade used. METHODS: For the study, a total of 60 patients were enrolled who underwent PPV followed by tμP-TSCPC as a result of an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) over the norm of 21 mmHg. In this group of patients, 20 received silicone oil endotamponade during PPV, 20 received sulfur hexafluoride gas SF6, and in another 20 a differentiated balanced salt solution (BSS) was used. RESULTS: The main indications for conducting PPV were (1) retinal detachment (silicone oil endotamponade was used; n = 12); (2) dislocation/subluxation of the patient’s own or artificial intraocular lens (balanced salt solution (BSS) endotamponade was used; n = 11); (3) the presence of an epiretinal membrane and/or a macular hole (BSS endotamponade was used; n = 9, or SF6; n = 20); and (4) hemorrhage into the vitreous chamber (silicone oil endotamponade was used; n = 8). CONCLUSION: The choice of endotamponade used during PPV was not found to determine the effectiveness of µP-TSCPC treatment. The effectiveness of µP-TSCPC in patients after PPV depended, above all, on the etiology of the disease, for which PPV was previously performed. The lowest effectiveness of µP-TSCPC was noted in cases where the reason for conducting PPV was hemorrhage into the vitreous chamber and silicone oil endotamponade was used, while the highest effectiveness was noted in cases where PPV was conducted owing to the presence of an epiretinal membrane and/or a macular hole and SF6 endotamponade was used.