Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. DESIGN: This study utilized a cross‐sectional design. METHODS: Authorization was obtained from the authors of the original scale to transl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Huan, Chen, Shengguang, Chen, Ting, Gan, Wei, Yang, Dan, Wang, Yujie, Zhang, Qinghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1360
_version_ 1784868479826919424
author Qi, Huan
Chen, Shengguang
Chen, Ting
Gan, Wei
Yang, Dan
Wang, Yujie
Zhang, Qinghua
author_facet Qi, Huan
Chen, Shengguang
Chen, Ting
Gan, Wei
Yang, Dan
Wang, Yujie
Zhang, Qinghua
author_sort Qi, Huan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. DESIGN: This study utilized a cross‐sectional design. METHODS: Authorization was obtained from the authors of the original scale to translate the scale and perform cross‐cultural debugging. From August 2020 to November 2020, 573 health professionals were randomly selected from primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals in Huzhou to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the scale contains 49 items. The internal consistency Cronbach's α was 0.958 for the total scale and 0.791–0.956 for each dimension. The test–retest reliability was 0.973. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness degree of the model is good (χ (2)/df = 1.347, IFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.913, CFI = 0.922, GFI = 0.841, AGFI = 0.815, RMR = 0.011, RMSEA = 0.035). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies is reliable and valid, which is a credible and effective tool to assess the level of health literacy competencies in Chinese health professionals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Health professionals with good health literacy competencies can provide patient‐specific treatment and guidance to promote healthy outcomes for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9834528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98345282023-01-13 Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals Qi, Huan Chen, Shengguang Chen, Ting Gan, Wei Yang, Dan Wang, Yujie Zhang, Qinghua Nurs Open Research Articles AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. DESIGN: This study utilized a cross‐sectional design. METHODS: Authorization was obtained from the authors of the original scale to translate the scale and perform cross‐cultural debugging. From August 2020 to November 2020, 573 health professionals were randomly selected from primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals in Huzhou to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals. RESULTS: The Chinese version of the scale contains 49 items. The internal consistency Cronbach's α was 0.958 for the total scale and 0.791–0.956 for each dimension. The test–retest reliability was 0.973. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness degree of the model is good (χ (2)/df = 1.347, IFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.913, CFI = 0.922, GFI = 0.841, AGFI = 0.815, RMR = 0.011, RMSEA = 0.035). CONCLUSION: The Chinese version of an instrument of health literacy competencies is reliable and valid, which is a credible and effective tool to assess the level of health literacy competencies in Chinese health professionals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Health professionals with good health literacy competencies can provide patient‐specific treatment and guidance to promote healthy outcomes for patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9834528/ /pubmed/36106612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1360 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Qi, Huan
Chen, Shengguang
Chen, Ting
Gan, Wei
Yang, Dan
Wang, Yujie
Zhang, Qinghua
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
title Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
title_full Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
title_short Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
title_sort reliability and validity of the chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1360
work_keys_str_mv AT qihuan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals
AT chenshengguang reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals
AT chenting reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals
AT ganwei reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals
AT yangdan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals
AT wangyujie reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals
AT zhangqinghua reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionoftheinstrumentofhealthliteracycompetenciesforhealthprofessionals