Cargando…
Comparison of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of 10–20 mm Lower Pole Stone: Prospective Non-randomized Study
Introduction: The objective of the study is to clarify the efficiency, safety, and limitations of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) in the management of lower pole stones (LPS). Methods: The present study was planned prospectively in a non-randomized manner. Patients...
Autor principal: | Kezer, Cem |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644093 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32452 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
por: Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
por: Knoll, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non–lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Bai, Song, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the treatment of upper/middle calyx kidney stones of 10–20 mm: a retrospective analysis of 174 patients
por: Cecen, Kursat, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Editorial Comment: Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤ 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Danilovic, Alexandre
Publicado: (2022)