Cargando…

A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories

INTRODUCTION: While data repositories are well‐established in clinical and research enterprises, knowledge repositories with shareable computable biomedical knowledge (CBK) are relatively new entities to the digital health ecosystem. Trustworthy knowledge repositories are necessary for learning heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Platt, Jodyn E., Solomonides, Anthony E., Walker, Philip D., Amara, Philip S., Richardson, Joshua E., Middleton, Blackford
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10314
_version_ 1784868592353804288
author Platt, Jodyn E.
Solomonides, Anthony E.
Walker, Philip D.
Amara, Philip S.
Richardson, Joshua E.
Middleton, Blackford
author_facet Platt, Jodyn E.
Solomonides, Anthony E.
Walker, Philip D.
Amara, Philip S.
Richardson, Joshua E.
Middleton, Blackford
author_sort Platt, Jodyn E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While data repositories are well‐established in clinical and research enterprises, knowledge repositories with shareable computable biomedical knowledge (CBK) are relatively new entities to the digital health ecosystem. Trustworthy knowledge repositories are necessary for learning health systems, but the policies, standards, and practices to promote trustworthy CBK artifacts and methods to share, and safely and effectively use them are not well studied METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 24 organizations in the United States known to be involved in the development or deployment of CBK. The aim of the survey was to assess the current policies and practices governing these repositories and to identify best practices. Descriptive statistics methods were applied to data from 13 responding organizations, to identify common practices and policies instantiating the TRUST principles of Transparency, Responsibility, User Focus, Sustainability, and Technology RESULTS: All 13 respondents indicated to different degrees adherence to policies that convey TRUST. Transparency is conveyed by having policies pertaining to provenance, credentialed contributors, and provision of metadata. Repositories provide knowledge in machine‐readable formats, include implementation guidelines, and adhere to standards to convey Responsibility. Repositories report having Technology functions that enable end‐users to verify, search, and filter for knowledge products. Less common TRUST practices are User Focused procedures that enable consumers to know about user licensing requirements or query the use of knowledge artifacts. Related to Sustainability, less than a majority post describe their sustainability plans. Few organizations publicly describe whether patients play any role in their decision‐making. CONCLUSION: It is essential that knowledge repositories identify and apply a baseline set of criteria to lay a robust foundation for their trustworthiness leading to optimum uptake, and safe, reliable, and effective use to promote sharing of CBK. Identifying current practices suggests a set of desiderata for the CBK ecosystem in its continued evolution
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9835044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98350442023-01-17 A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories Platt, Jodyn E. Solomonides, Anthony E. Walker, Philip D. Amara, Philip S. Richardson, Joshua E. Middleton, Blackford Learn Health Syst Research Reports INTRODUCTION: While data repositories are well‐established in clinical and research enterprises, knowledge repositories with shareable computable biomedical knowledge (CBK) are relatively new entities to the digital health ecosystem. Trustworthy knowledge repositories are necessary for learning health systems, but the policies, standards, and practices to promote trustworthy CBK artifacts and methods to share, and safely and effectively use them are not well studied METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 24 organizations in the United States known to be involved in the development or deployment of CBK. The aim of the survey was to assess the current policies and practices governing these repositories and to identify best practices. Descriptive statistics methods were applied to data from 13 responding organizations, to identify common practices and policies instantiating the TRUST principles of Transparency, Responsibility, User Focus, Sustainability, and Technology RESULTS: All 13 respondents indicated to different degrees adherence to policies that convey TRUST. Transparency is conveyed by having policies pertaining to provenance, credentialed contributors, and provision of metadata. Repositories provide knowledge in machine‐readable formats, include implementation guidelines, and adhere to standards to convey Responsibility. Repositories report having Technology functions that enable end‐users to verify, search, and filter for knowledge products. Less common TRUST practices are User Focused procedures that enable consumers to know about user licensing requirements or query the use of knowledge artifacts. Related to Sustainability, less than a majority post describe their sustainability plans. Few organizations publicly describe whether patients play any role in their decision‐making. CONCLUSION: It is essential that knowledge repositories identify and apply a baseline set of criteria to lay a robust foundation for their trustworthiness leading to optimum uptake, and safe, reliable, and effective use to promote sharing of CBK. Identifying current practices suggests a set of desiderata for the CBK ecosystem in its continued evolution John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9835044/ /pubmed/36654807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10314 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of University of Michigan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Platt, Jodyn E.
Solomonides, Anthony E.
Walker, Philip D.
Amara, Philip S.
Richardson, Joshua E.
Middleton, Blackford
A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
title A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
title_full A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
title_fullStr A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
title_full_unstemmed A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
title_short A survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
title_sort survey of computable biomedical knowledge repositories
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10314
work_keys_str_mv AT plattjodyne asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT solomonidesanthonye asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT walkerphilipd asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT amaraphilips asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT richardsonjoshuae asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT middletonblackford asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT asurveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT plattjodyne surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT solomonidesanthonye surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT walkerphilipd surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT amaraphilips surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT richardsonjoshuae surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT middletonblackford surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories
AT surveyofcomputablebiomedicalknowledgerepositories