Cargando…

Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a critical public health issue in Central and Eastern European Countries, where it is the second leading cause of female cancer deaths. In this study, we aimed to identify the presence of CRC policies in EaP Countries and analyze the content of CRC policies for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nonikashvili, M, Kereselidze, M, Beruchashvili, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835117/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.002
_version_ 1784868605606756352
author Nonikashvili, M
Kereselidze, M
Beruchashvili, T
author_facet Nonikashvili, M
Kereselidze, M
Beruchashvili, T
author_sort Nonikashvili, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a critical public health issue in Central and Eastern European Countries, where it is the second leading cause of female cancer deaths. In this study, we aimed to identify the presence of CRC policies in EaP Countries and analyze the content of CRC policies for comprehensiveness. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review based on the methodological framework suggested by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched for publicly-available policy documents from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. We outline each country’s prevention approaches and activities based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for CRC screening. RESULTS: Most countries had at least one policy addressing some aspect of colorectal cancer prevention. Primary and secondary prevention were most commonly addressed, and certain details such as healthy lifestyle campaigns, target age and screening method (gFOBT, FIT or colonoscopy) were frequently mentioned in these policies. Policies to implement or pilot population-based CRC screening program have been adopted only by Georgia. Our analysis revealed the urgent need to improve the availability and use of colorectal cancer screening among those countries. CONCLUSIONS: These country experiences suggest that while prevention approaches can promote the best strategies to carry out screening programs, there is no standardized approach to screening for CRC. KEY MESSAGES: • Further research is urgently needed to better understand CRC screening needs of adults in EaP. • Necessity of CRC screening irrespective of need will help make shift from curative to preventive cancer care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9835117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98351172023-01-17 Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis Nonikashvili, M Kereselidze, M Beruchashvili, T Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a critical public health issue in Central and Eastern European Countries, where it is the second leading cause of female cancer deaths. In this study, we aimed to identify the presence of CRC policies in EaP Countries and analyze the content of CRC policies for comprehensiveness. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review based on the methodological framework suggested by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched for publicly-available policy documents from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. We outline each country’s prevention approaches and activities based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for CRC screening. RESULTS: Most countries had at least one policy addressing some aspect of colorectal cancer prevention. Primary and secondary prevention were most commonly addressed, and certain details such as healthy lifestyle campaigns, target age and screening method (gFOBT, FIT or colonoscopy) were frequently mentioned in these policies. Policies to implement or pilot population-based CRC screening program have been adopted only by Georgia. Our analysis revealed the urgent need to improve the availability and use of colorectal cancer screening among those countries. CONCLUSIONS: These country experiences suggest that while prevention approaches can promote the best strategies to carry out screening programs, there is no standardized approach to screening for CRC. KEY MESSAGES: • Further research is urgently needed to better understand CRC screening needs of adults in EaP. • Necessity of CRC screening irrespective of need will help make shift from curative to preventive cancer care. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9835117/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.002 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Nonikashvili, M
Kereselidze, M
Beruchashvili, T
Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis
title Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis
title_full Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis
title_fullStr Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis
title_short Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Eastern European (EaP) Countries: A Policy Analysis
title_sort colorectal cancer prevention in eastern european (eap) countries: a policy analysis
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835117/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.002
work_keys_str_mv AT nonikashvilim colorectalcancerpreventionineasterneuropeaneapcountriesapolicyanalysis
AT kereselidzem colorectalcancerpreventionineasterneuropeaneapcountriesapolicyanalysis
AT beruchashvilit colorectalcancerpreventionineasterneuropeaneapcountriesapolicyanalysis