Cargando…

Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022

BACKGROUND: Comparing disease severity between SARS‐CoV‐2 variants among populations with varied vaccination and infection histories can help characterize emerging variants and support healthcare system preparedness. METHODS: We compared COVID‐19 hospitalization risk among New York City residents wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greene, Sharon K., Levin‐Rector, Alison, Kyaw, Nang T. T., Luoma, Elizabeth, Amin, Helly, McGibbon, Emily, Mathes, Robert W., Ahuja, Shama D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36317297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.13062
_version_ 1784868661437136896
author Greene, Sharon K.
Levin‐Rector, Alison
Kyaw, Nang T. T.
Luoma, Elizabeth
Amin, Helly
McGibbon, Emily
Mathes, Robert W.
Ahuja, Shama D.
author_facet Greene, Sharon K.
Levin‐Rector, Alison
Kyaw, Nang T. T.
Luoma, Elizabeth
Amin, Helly
McGibbon, Emily
Mathes, Robert W.
Ahuja, Shama D.
author_sort Greene, Sharon K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparing disease severity between SARS‐CoV‐2 variants among populations with varied vaccination and infection histories can help characterize emerging variants and support healthcare system preparedness. METHODS: We compared COVID‐19 hospitalization risk among New York City residents with positive laboratory‐based SARS‐CoV‐2 tests when ≥98% of sequencing results were Delta (August–November 2021) or Omicron (BA.1 and sublineages, January 2022). A secondary analysis defined variant exposure using patient‐level sequencing results during July 2021–January 2022, comprising 1–18% of weekly confirmed cases. RESULTS: Hospitalization risk was lower among patients testing positive when Omicron (16,025/488,053, 3.3%) than when Delta predominated (8268/158,799, 5.2%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic characteristics and prior diagnosis and vaccination status, patients testing positive when Omicron predominated, compared with Delta, had 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.82) times the hospitalization risk. In a secondary analysis of patients with sequencing results, hospitalization risk was similar among patients infected with Omicron (2042/29,866, 6.8%), compared with Delta (1780/25,272, 7.0%), and higher among the subset who received two mRNA vaccine doses (adjusted relative risk 1.64; 95% CI: 1.44, 1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization risk was lower among patients testing positive when Omicron predominated, compared with Delta. This finding persisted after adjusting for prior diagnosis and vaccination status, suggesting intrinsic virologic properties, not population‐based immunity, explained the lower severity. Secondary analyses demonstrated collider bias from the sequencing sampling frame changing over time in ways associated with disease severity. Representative data collection is necessary to avoid bias when comparing disease severity between previously dominant and newly emerging variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9835408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98354082023-01-17 Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022 Greene, Sharon K. Levin‐Rector, Alison Kyaw, Nang T. T. Luoma, Elizabeth Amin, Helly McGibbon, Emily Mathes, Robert W. Ahuja, Shama D. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Comparing disease severity between SARS‐CoV‐2 variants among populations with varied vaccination and infection histories can help characterize emerging variants and support healthcare system preparedness. METHODS: We compared COVID‐19 hospitalization risk among New York City residents with positive laboratory‐based SARS‐CoV‐2 tests when ≥98% of sequencing results were Delta (August–November 2021) or Omicron (BA.1 and sublineages, January 2022). A secondary analysis defined variant exposure using patient‐level sequencing results during July 2021–January 2022, comprising 1–18% of weekly confirmed cases. RESULTS: Hospitalization risk was lower among patients testing positive when Omicron (16,025/488,053, 3.3%) than when Delta predominated (8268/158,799, 5.2%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic characteristics and prior diagnosis and vaccination status, patients testing positive when Omicron predominated, compared with Delta, had 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.82) times the hospitalization risk. In a secondary analysis of patients with sequencing results, hospitalization risk was similar among patients infected with Omicron (2042/29,866, 6.8%), compared with Delta (1780/25,272, 7.0%), and higher among the subset who received two mRNA vaccine doses (adjusted relative risk 1.64; 95% CI: 1.44, 1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization risk was lower among patients testing positive when Omicron predominated, compared with Delta. This finding persisted after adjusting for prior diagnosis and vaccination status, suggesting intrinsic virologic properties, not population‐based immunity, explained the lower severity. Secondary analyses demonstrated collider bias from the sequencing sampling frame changing over time in ways associated with disease severity. Representative data collection is necessary to avoid bias when comparing disease severity between previously dominant and newly emerging variants. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9835408/ /pubmed/36317297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.13062 Text en Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Greene, Sharon K.
Levin‐Rector, Alison
Kyaw, Nang T. T.
Luoma, Elizabeth
Amin, Helly
McGibbon, Emily
Mathes, Robert W.
Ahuja, Shama D.
Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022
title Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022
title_full Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022
title_fullStr Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022
title_full_unstemmed Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022
title_short Comparative hospitalization risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron and Delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, New York City, August 2021–January 2022
title_sort comparative hospitalization risk for sars‐cov‐2 omicron and delta variant infections, by variant predominance periods and patient‐level sequencing results, new york city, august 2021–january 2022
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36317297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.13062
work_keys_str_mv AT greenesharonk comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT levinrectoralison comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT kyawnangtt comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT luomaelizabeth comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT aminhelly comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT mcgibbonemily comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT mathesrobertw comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022
AT ahujashamad comparativehospitalizationriskforsarscov2omicronanddeltavariantinfectionsbyvariantpredominanceperiodsandpatientlevelsequencingresultsnewyorkcityaugust2021january2022