Cargando…

9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum

 : Today, several countries are conducting national burden of disease (BOD) studies, calculating Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) for a variety of diseases, injuries and risk factors. The DALY metric is composed of a morbidity component, the Years Lived with Disability (YLDs), and a mortality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835484/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.618
_version_ 1784868676569137152
collection PubMed
description  : Today, several countries are conducting national burden of disease (BOD) studies, calculating Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) for a variety of diseases, injuries and risk factors. The DALY metric is composed of a morbidity component, the Years Lived with Disability (YLDs), and a mortality component, the Years of Life Lost (YLLs). The calculation of YLLs typically starts from national cause of death data, which are coded using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). National BOD studies however often follow (a modified version of) the cause hierarchy of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, which applies coarser categories, and does not contain unknown or ill-defined causes. This implies that not all ICD codes can be mapped to one specific BOD cause, giving rise to so-called “ill-defined” or “garbage” codes. To include all deaths in a national BOD study, it is therefore necessary to redistribute the ill-defined deaths to specific BOD causes. Several methodological approaches exist for redistribution of ill-defined deaths, ranging from the use of fixed redistribution proportions to advanced redistribution algorithms based on multiple cause of death data. The choice of the methodology needs to depend on the nature of the available cause of death data, and as a consequence, methodologies are typically tailored to the specific data at hand. The absence of a single best methodology, and the methodological heterogeneity across applications, has made redistribution of ill-defined deaths into a methodological conundrum. This skills building workshop will present the redistribution methods applied in different national burden of disease studies, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. By providing a step-by-step presentation of how the methods have been applied, attendees will gain unique insights in the different redistribution methods currently applied. KEY MESSAGES: • Redistribution of ill-defined deaths is an essential part of national burden of disease studies, but is methodologically challenging. • Attendees will receive an overview of the redistribution methods applied in different national burden of disease studies, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9835484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98354842023-01-17 9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme  : Today, several countries are conducting national burden of disease (BOD) studies, calculating Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) for a variety of diseases, injuries and risk factors. The DALY metric is composed of a morbidity component, the Years Lived with Disability (YLDs), and a mortality component, the Years of Life Lost (YLLs). The calculation of YLLs typically starts from national cause of death data, which are coded using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). National BOD studies however often follow (a modified version of) the cause hierarchy of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, which applies coarser categories, and does not contain unknown or ill-defined causes. This implies that not all ICD codes can be mapped to one specific BOD cause, giving rise to so-called “ill-defined” or “garbage” codes. To include all deaths in a national BOD study, it is therefore necessary to redistribute the ill-defined deaths to specific BOD causes. Several methodological approaches exist for redistribution of ill-defined deaths, ranging from the use of fixed redistribution proportions to advanced redistribution algorithms based on multiple cause of death data. The choice of the methodology needs to depend on the nature of the available cause of death data, and as a consequence, methodologies are typically tailored to the specific data at hand. The absence of a single best methodology, and the methodological heterogeneity across applications, has made redistribution of ill-defined deaths into a methodological conundrum. This skills building workshop will present the redistribution methods applied in different national burden of disease studies, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. By providing a step-by-step presentation of how the methods have been applied, attendees will gain unique insights in the different redistribution methods currently applied. KEY MESSAGES: • Redistribution of ill-defined deaths is an essential part of national burden of disease studies, but is methodologically challenging. • Attendees will receive an overview of the redistribution methods applied in different national burden of disease studies, including a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9835484/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.618 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
title 9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
title_full 9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
title_fullStr 9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
title_full_unstemmed 9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
title_short 9.Q. Skills building seminar: Redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
title_sort 9.q. skills building seminar: redistribution of ill-defined deaths: a methodological conundrum
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835484/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.618
work_keys_str_mv AT 9qskillsbuildingseminarredistributionofilldefineddeathsamethodologicalconundrum
AT 9qskillsbuildingseminarredistributionofilldefineddeathsamethodologicalconundrum