Cargando…

Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City

[Image: see text] Following an exceedance of the lead action level for drinking water in 2016, the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority (PWSA) undertook two sampling programs: the required biannual Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) compliance testing and a home sampling program based on customer requests....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijayashanthar, Vasikan, Small, Mitchell J., VanBriesen, Jeanne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36563039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06614
_version_ 1784868756698169344
author Vijayashanthar, Vasikan
Small, Mitchell J.
VanBriesen, Jeanne M.
author_facet Vijayashanthar, Vasikan
Small, Mitchell J.
VanBriesen, Jeanne M.
author_sort Vijayashanthar, Vasikan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Following an exceedance of the lead action level for drinking water in 2016, the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority (PWSA) undertook two sampling programs: the required biannual Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) compliance testing and a home sampling program based on customer requests. The LCR sampling results, at locations expected to be elevated when corrosion is not well controlled, had higher concentrations than customer-requested homes, with 90th percentile values for the LCR sites exceeding the action level through 2019 (except for June 2018). Customer-requested concentrations showed greater variability, with the median lead concentration for customer-requested samples below detection for each year of sampling, suggesting only some homes show elevated lead when corrosion control is not fully effective. Corrosion control adjustments brought the utility back into compliance in 2020 (LCR 90th percentile of 5.1 ppb in June 2020); customer-requested sampling after the addition of orthophosphate indicated below detection levels for 59% of samples. Monte Carlo simulations indicate LCR samples do not all represent high lead risk sites, and the application of corrosion control more significantly affects higher lead concentration sites. Broader water quality sampling provides information about specific homes but is not well suited to assessing the efficacy of corrosion control efforts by utilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9835881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98358812023-01-13 Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City Vijayashanthar, Vasikan Small, Mitchell J. VanBriesen, Jeanne M. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Following an exceedance of the lead action level for drinking water in 2016, the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority (PWSA) undertook two sampling programs: the required biannual Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) compliance testing and a home sampling program based on customer requests. The LCR sampling results, at locations expected to be elevated when corrosion is not well controlled, had higher concentrations than customer-requested homes, with 90th percentile values for the LCR sites exceeding the action level through 2019 (except for June 2018). Customer-requested concentrations showed greater variability, with the median lead concentration for customer-requested samples below detection for each year of sampling, suggesting only some homes show elevated lead when corrosion control is not fully effective. Corrosion control adjustments brought the utility back into compliance in 2020 (LCR 90th percentile of 5.1 ppb in June 2020); customer-requested sampling after the addition of orthophosphate indicated below detection levels for 59% of samples. Monte Carlo simulations indicate LCR samples do not all represent high lead risk sites, and the application of corrosion control more significantly affects higher lead concentration sites. Broader water quality sampling provides information about specific homes but is not well suited to assessing the efficacy of corrosion control efforts by utilities. American Chemical Society 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9835881/ /pubmed/36563039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06614 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Vijayashanthar, Vasikan
Small, Mitchell J.
VanBriesen, Jeanne M.
Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City
title Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City
title_full Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City
title_fullStr Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City
title_short Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City
title_sort assessment of lead in drinking water from multiple drinking water sampling programs for a midsize city
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36563039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06614
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayashantharvasikan assessmentofleadindrinkingwaterfrommultipledrinkingwatersamplingprogramsforamidsizecity
AT smallmitchellj assessmentofleadindrinkingwaterfrommultipledrinkingwatersamplingprogramsforamidsizecity
AT vanbriesenjeannem assessmentofleadindrinkingwaterfrommultipledrinkingwatersamplingprogramsforamidsizecity