Cargando…
Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation
OBJECTIVE: To study the visual, refractive and surgical outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, non-randomised interventional study. METHODS: All consecutive children with microspherophakia who satisfied t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001049 |
_version_ | 1784868763727822848 |
---|---|
author | Chattannavar, Goura Mohamed, Ashik Malgi, Vishwesh Kekunnaya, Ramesh |
author_facet | Chattannavar, Goura Mohamed, Ashik Malgi, Vishwesh Kekunnaya, Ramesh |
author_sort | Chattannavar, Goura |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To study the visual, refractive and surgical outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, non-randomised interventional study. METHODS: All consecutive children with microspherophakia who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. The eyes that underwent in-the-bag IOL implantation and those that were left aphakic were included in groups A and B, respectively. The postoperative visual outcomes, IOL stability and complications during the follow-up period were studied. RESULTS: 22 eyes (13 patients, male 76%), of which 12 eyes were in group A and 10 eyes in group B. The mean±SE of age at surgery was 9.4±1.4 and 7.3±0.9 years in group A and group B, respectively (p value 0.18). The mean follow-up of group A was 0.9±0.4 years (median 0.5 years; Q1 0.04, Q3 2.16) and group B was 1.3±0.9 years (median 0.147 years; Q1 0.08, Q3 0.39) (p value 0.76). All the baseline biometric variables including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were comparable in each group. The final BCVA in logMAR adjusted for follow-up was comparable in both group A (0.29±0.06) and group B (0.52±0.09) (p value 0.06). Mean predictive error of IOL power in microspherophakia was 0.17±0.43. The most common complication in group A was visual axis opacification of two eyes (16.7%, 95% CI 2.9% to 49.1%), of which one eye (8.3%, 95% CI 0.4% to 40.2%) needed membranectomy. Vitreous in anterior chamber was the most common complication in group B, seen in two eyes (20%, 95% CI 3.5% to 55.8%), of which one eye (10%, 95% CI 0.5% to 45.9%) underwent YAG laser vitreolysis. The survival analysis (p value 0.18) was comparable in each group. CONCLUSION: In-the-bag IOL is an option, which can be considered in selected cases of microspherophakia in developing nations where regular follow-up and economic constraints are a major concern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9835943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98359432023-01-13 Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation Chattannavar, Goura Mohamed, Ashik Malgi, Vishwesh Kekunnaya, Ramesh BMJ Open Ophthalmol Paediatric Ophthalmology OBJECTIVE: To study the visual, refractive and surgical outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, non-randomised interventional study. METHODS: All consecutive children with microspherophakia who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. The eyes that underwent in-the-bag IOL implantation and those that were left aphakic were included in groups A and B, respectively. The postoperative visual outcomes, IOL stability and complications during the follow-up period were studied. RESULTS: 22 eyes (13 patients, male 76%), of which 12 eyes were in group A and 10 eyes in group B. The mean±SE of age at surgery was 9.4±1.4 and 7.3±0.9 years in group A and group B, respectively (p value 0.18). The mean follow-up of group A was 0.9±0.4 years (median 0.5 years; Q1 0.04, Q3 2.16) and group B was 1.3±0.9 years (median 0.147 years; Q1 0.08, Q3 0.39) (p value 0.76). All the baseline biometric variables including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were comparable in each group. The final BCVA in logMAR adjusted for follow-up was comparable in both group A (0.29±0.06) and group B (0.52±0.09) (p value 0.06). Mean predictive error of IOL power in microspherophakia was 0.17±0.43. The most common complication in group A was visual axis opacification of two eyes (16.7%, 95% CI 2.9% to 49.1%), of which one eye (8.3%, 95% CI 0.4% to 40.2%) needed membranectomy. Vitreous in anterior chamber was the most common complication in group B, seen in two eyes (20%, 95% CI 3.5% to 55.8%), of which one eye (10%, 95% CI 0.5% to 45.9%) underwent YAG laser vitreolysis. The survival analysis (p value 0.18) was comparable in each group. CONCLUSION: In-the-bag IOL is an option, which can be considered in selected cases of microspherophakia in developing nations where regular follow-up and economic constraints are a major concern. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9835943/ /pubmed/37278431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001049 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Paediatric Ophthalmology Chattannavar, Goura Mohamed, Ashik Malgi, Vishwesh Kekunnaya, Ramesh Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
title | Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
title_full | Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
title_fullStr | Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
title_short | Visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
title_sort | visual outcomes and safety profile of intraocular lens implantation versus aphakia in children with microspherophakia with no subluxation |
topic | Paediatric Ophthalmology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chattannavargoura visualoutcomesandsafetyprofileofintraocularlensimplantationversusaphakiainchildrenwithmicrospherophakiawithnosubluxation AT mohamedashik visualoutcomesandsafetyprofileofintraocularlensimplantationversusaphakiainchildrenwithmicrospherophakiawithnosubluxation AT malgivishwesh visualoutcomesandsafetyprofileofintraocularlensimplantationversusaphakiainchildrenwithmicrospherophakiawithnosubluxation AT kekunnayaramesh visualoutcomesandsafetyprofileofintraocularlensimplantationversusaphakiainchildrenwithmicrospherophakiawithnosubluxation |