Cargando…

Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients

Background Clinical performance, anterior knee stability, and isokinetic strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts are mainly influenced by graft selection, femoral tunnel preparation, and type of femoral fixation. Expandable femoral fixation devices ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panagopoulos, Andreas, Giannatos, Vasileios, Moros, Giorgos, Mylonas, Dimitrios, Kouzelis, Antonis, Gliatis, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644094
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32482
_version_ 1784868778838851584
author Panagopoulos, Andreas
Giannatos, Vasileios
Moros, Giorgos
Mylonas, Dimitrios
Kouzelis, Antonis
Gliatis, John
author_facet Panagopoulos, Andreas
Giannatos, Vasileios
Moros, Giorgos
Mylonas, Dimitrios
Kouzelis, Antonis
Gliatis, John
author_sort Panagopoulos, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Background Clinical performance, anterior knee stability, and isokinetic strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts are mainly influenced by graft selection, femoral tunnel preparation, and type of femoral fixation. Expandable femoral fixation devices are expected to provide a stronger initial fixation with circular graft compression, a blind-ended tunnel in the femur with less enlargement, and a theoretical double-band ACL equivalent through graft rotation. This study aimed to evaluate isokinetic strength and functional capacity after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons using two different anatomical femoral fixation techniques (expandable vs fixed-looped button). Methodology A total of 48 male patients with ACL deficient knees were randomized to two different femoral fixation groups, namely, the expandable (AperFix) and the standard cortical (Button) group. The primary outcome measures were isokinetic hamstrings and quadriceps strength capabilities and the hamstrings/quadriceps ratio at 60 degrees/second (°/s) and 180°/s using a Cybex before and at three, six, nine, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Secondary measurements were anteroposterior knee stability at two years (using KT-1000 arthrometer) and the functional outcome using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) form, the Tegner activity scale, and the Lysholm knee score. Data were compared using a paired t-test and analysis of variance, with a p < 0.05 level of significance. Results Most patients regained the 60°/s quadriceps strength between three and 12 months (62.5% for the Button group vs. 50% for the AperFix group), as well as the 180°/s strength (79.17% vs 70.83%); however, at the 24-month evaluation, seven (29.17%) patients in the Button group and five (20.83%) in the AperFix group had significant deficits. The 60°/s flexor strength was regained in the first six months in 19 (79.17%) patients in the Button group and in 16 (66.7%) patients in the AperFix group, whereas the percentages for the 180°/s strength were 79.17% and 75%, respectively. Beyond the 24-month evaluation, only three (12.5%) patients in the Button group and four (16.67%) in the AperFix group had significant flexor deficits. Regarding the H/Q ratio, at 60°/s, the mean recovery time was six and 7.5 months for the Button and AperFix groups, respectively, whereas 15 and 12 patients, respectively, did not recover during the two-year duration. At 180°/s, a mean recovery time of six months was needed for the button group, and nine patients did not recover two years later. For the AperFix group, nine months were needed, and 12 patients did not recover in two years. Clinical performance and anterior knee stability showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Conclusions Although there were no significant differences in clinical performance, knee stability, and isokinetic strength testing between expandable and cortical button femoral fixation groups, return to play was doubtful at two years postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9836015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98360152023-01-13 Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients Panagopoulos, Andreas Giannatos, Vasileios Moros, Giorgos Mylonas, Dimitrios Kouzelis, Antonis Gliatis, John Cureus Orthopedics Background Clinical performance, anterior knee stability, and isokinetic strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts are mainly influenced by graft selection, femoral tunnel preparation, and type of femoral fixation. Expandable femoral fixation devices are expected to provide a stronger initial fixation with circular graft compression, a blind-ended tunnel in the femur with less enlargement, and a theoretical double-band ACL equivalent through graft rotation. This study aimed to evaluate isokinetic strength and functional capacity after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons using two different anatomical femoral fixation techniques (expandable vs fixed-looped button). Methodology A total of 48 male patients with ACL deficient knees were randomized to two different femoral fixation groups, namely, the expandable (AperFix) and the standard cortical (Button) group. The primary outcome measures were isokinetic hamstrings and quadriceps strength capabilities and the hamstrings/quadriceps ratio at 60 degrees/second (°/s) and 180°/s using a Cybex before and at three, six, nine, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Secondary measurements were anteroposterior knee stability at two years (using KT-1000 arthrometer) and the functional outcome using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) form, the Tegner activity scale, and the Lysholm knee score. Data were compared using a paired t-test and analysis of variance, with a p < 0.05 level of significance. Results Most patients regained the 60°/s quadriceps strength between three and 12 months (62.5% for the Button group vs. 50% for the AperFix group), as well as the 180°/s strength (79.17% vs 70.83%); however, at the 24-month evaluation, seven (29.17%) patients in the Button group and five (20.83%) in the AperFix group had significant deficits. The 60°/s flexor strength was regained in the first six months in 19 (79.17%) patients in the Button group and in 16 (66.7%) patients in the AperFix group, whereas the percentages for the 180°/s strength were 79.17% and 75%, respectively. Beyond the 24-month evaluation, only three (12.5%) patients in the Button group and four (16.67%) in the AperFix group had significant flexor deficits. Regarding the H/Q ratio, at 60°/s, the mean recovery time was six and 7.5 months for the Button and AperFix groups, respectively, whereas 15 and 12 patients, respectively, did not recover during the two-year duration. At 180°/s, a mean recovery time of six months was needed for the button group, and nine patients did not recover two years later. For the AperFix group, nine months were needed, and 12 patients did not recover in two years. Clinical performance and anterior knee stability showed no statistically significant differences between groups. Conclusions Although there were no significant differences in clinical performance, knee stability, and isokinetic strength testing between expandable and cortical button femoral fixation groups, return to play was doubtful at two years postoperatively. Cureus 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9836015/ /pubmed/36644094 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32482 Text en Copyright © 2022, Panagopoulos et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Panagopoulos, Andreas
Giannatos, Vasileios
Moros, Giorgos
Mylonas, Dimitrios
Kouzelis, Antonis
Gliatis, John
Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients
title Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients
title_full Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients
title_fullStr Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients
title_full_unstemmed Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients
title_short Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function in Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study Between Suspensory and Expandable Femoral Fixation in Male Patients
title_sort isokinetic muscle strength and knee function in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective randomized comparative study between suspensory and expandable femoral fixation in male patients
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644094
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32482
work_keys_str_mv AT panagopoulosandreas isokineticmusclestrengthandkneefunctioninanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringautograftsaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudybetweensuspensoryandexpandablefemoralfixationinmalepatients
AT giannatosvasileios isokineticmusclestrengthandkneefunctioninanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringautograftsaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudybetweensuspensoryandexpandablefemoralfixationinmalepatients
AT morosgiorgos isokineticmusclestrengthandkneefunctioninanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringautograftsaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudybetweensuspensoryandexpandablefemoralfixationinmalepatients
AT mylonasdimitrios isokineticmusclestrengthandkneefunctioninanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringautograftsaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudybetweensuspensoryandexpandablefemoralfixationinmalepatients
AT kouzelisantonis isokineticmusclestrengthandkneefunctioninanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringautograftsaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudybetweensuspensoryandexpandablefemoralfixationinmalepatients
AT gliatisjohn isokineticmusclestrengthandkneefunctioninanatomicalanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringautograftsaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudybetweensuspensoryandexpandablefemoralfixationinmalepatients