Cargando…

Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest

DNA replication is essential for all living organisms. Several events can disrupt replication, including DNA damage (e.g., pyrimidine dimers, crosslinking) and so-called “roadblocks” (e.g., DNA-binding proteins or transcription). Bacteria have several well-characterized mechanisms for repairing dama...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schons-Fonseca, Luciane, Lazova, Milena D., Smith, Janet L., Anderson, Mary E., Grossman, Alan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36574412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010564
_version_ 1784868832844709888
author Schons-Fonseca, Luciane
Lazova, Milena D.
Smith, Janet L.
Anderson, Mary E.
Grossman, Alan D.
author_facet Schons-Fonseca, Luciane
Lazova, Milena D.
Smith, Janet L.
Anderson, Mary E.
Grossman, Alan D.
author_sort Schons-Fonseca, Luciane
collection PubMed
description DNA replication is essential for all living organisms. Several events can disrupt replication, including DNA damage (e.g., pyrimidine dimers, crosslinking) and so-called “roadblocks” (e.g., DNA-binding proteins or transcription). Bacteria have several well-characterized mechanisms for repairing damaged DNA and then restoring functional replication forks. However, little is known about the repair of stalled or arrested replication forks in the absence of chemical alterations to DNA. Using a library of random transposon insertions in Bacillus subtilis, we identified 35 genes that affect the ability of cells to survive exposure to an inhibitor that arrests replication elongation, but does not cause chemical alteration of the DNA. Genes identified include those involved in iron-sulfur homeostasis, cell envelope biogenesis, and DNA repair and recombination. In B. subtilis, and many bacteria, two nucleases (AddAB and RecJ) are involved in early steps in repairing replication forks arrested by chemical damage to DNA and loss of either nuclease causes increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. These nucleases resect DNA ends, leading to assembly of the recombinase RecA onto the single-stranded DNA. Notably, we found that disruption of recJ increased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that in the absence of chemical damage to DNA, RecJ is detrimental to survival. In contrast, and as expected, disruption of addA decreased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that AddA promotes survival. The different phenotypes of addA and recJ mutants appeared to be due to differences in assembly of RecA onto DNA. RecJ appeared to promote too much assembly of RecA filaments. Our results indicate that in the absence of chemical damage to DNA, RecA is dispensable for cells to survive replication arrest and that the stable RecA nucleofilaments favored by the RecJ pathway may lead to cell death by preventing proper processing of the arrested replication fork.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9836290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98362902023-01-13 Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest Schons-Fonseca, Luciane Lazova, Milena D. Smith, Janet L. Anderson, Mary E. Grossman, Alan D. PLoS Genet Research Article DNA replication is essential for all living organisms. Several events can disrupt replication, including DNA damage (e.g., pyrimidine dimers, crosslinking) and so-called “roadblocks” (e.g., DNA-binding proteins or transcription). Bacteria have several well-characterized mechanisms for repairing damaged DNA and then restoring functional replication forks. However, little is known about the repair of stalled or arrested replication forks in the absence of chemical alterations to DNA. Using a library of random transposon insertions in Bacillus subtilis, we identified 35 genes that affect the ability of cells to survive exposure to an inhibitor that arrests replication elongation, but does not cause chemical alteration of the DNA. Genes identified include those involved in iron-sulfur homeostasis, cell envelope biogenesis, and DNA repair and recombination. In B. subtilis, and many bacteria, two nucleases (AddAB and RecJ) are involved in early steps in repairing replication forks arrested by chemical damage to DNA and loss of either nuclease causes increased sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. These nucleases resect DNA ends, leading to assembly of the recombinase RecA onto the single-stranded DNA. Notably, we found that disruption of recJ increased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that in the absence of chemical damage to DNA, RecJ is detrimental to survival. In contrast, and as expected, disruption of addA decreased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that AddA promotes survival. The different phenotypes of addA and recJ mutants appeared to be due to differences in assembly of RecA onto DNA. RecJ appeared to promote too much assembly of RecA filaments. Our results indicate that in the absence of chemical damage to DNA, RecA is dispensable for cells to survive replication arrest and that the stable RecA nucleofilaments favored by the RecJ pathway may lead to cell death by preventing proper processing of the arrested replication fork. Public Library of Science 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9836290/ /pubmed/36574412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010564 Text en © 2022 Schons-Fonseca et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schons-Fonseca, Luciane
Lazova, Milena D.
Smith, Janet L.
Anderson, Mary E.
Grossman, Alan D.
Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
title Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
title_full Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
title_fullStr Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
title_full_unstemmed Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
title_short Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
title_sort beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36574412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010564
work_keys_str_mv AT schonsfonsecaluciane beneficialanddetrimentalgenesinthecellularresponsetoreplicationarrest
AT lazovamilenad beneficialanddetrimentalgenesinthecellularresponsetoreplicationarrest
AT smithjanetl beneficialanddetrimentalgenesinthecellularresponsetoreplicationarrest
AT andersonmarye beneficialanddetrimentalgenesinthecellularresponsetoreplicationarrest
AT grossmanaland beneficialanddetrimentalgenesinthecellularresponsetoreplicationarrest