Cargando…

Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review

Background: Though The Joint Commission requires health systems perform annual formulary review, guidance for how to perform this review is lacking. Published methods include comprehensive review of all pharmaceutical classes; however, this approach may not be the most efficient or effective option...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheldon, Holly, Kostrzewa, Audrey, Werner, Shannon, Audley, Terry, Biggs, Adam, Mancuso, Taylor, Picone, Mary Frances
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654702
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4785
_version_ 1784868932635590656
author Sheldon, Holly
Kostrzewa, Audrey
Werner, Shannon
Audley, Terry
Biggs, Adam
Mancuso, Taylor
Picone, Mary Frances
author_facet Sheldon, Holly
Kostrzewa, Audrey
Werner, Shannon
Audley, Terry
Biggs, Adam
Mancuso, Taylor
Picone, Mary Frances
author_sort Sheldon, Holly
collection PubMed
description Background: Though The Joint Commission requires health systems perform annual formulary review, guidance for how to perform this review is lacking. Published methods include comprehensive review of all pharmaceutical classes; however, this approach may not be the most efficient or effective option for a health system with a large formulary. Objective: To create a prioritization system for annual formulary review through development of a pharmaceutical class scoring tool. Methods: Drug information pharmacists developed the scoring tool, which used external and internal data to score pharmaceutical classes in 4 categories: safety, efficacy, cost, and utilization. The primary outcome, number of formulary changes resulting from pharmaceutical class review, was compared between the highest-scoring and lowest-scoring class to assess the tool’s ability to prioritize high-yield class reviews. Results: The tool calculated scores for 91 pharmaceutical classes, altogether containing 962 medications. After review of the highest-scoring class, corticosteroids, 2 formulary changes were made: one dosage form was removed from formulary, and one medication was restricted to outpatient use only. Zero formulary changes resulted from review of the lowest-scoring class, pharmaceutical adjuvants. Conclusions: The tool described in this study prioritized annual formulary review efforts by identifying a pharmaceutical class with meaningful formulary optimization opportunities as the highest-scoring class, while correctly identifying a class with no optimization opportunities as the lowest-scoring class.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9836755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98367552023-01-17 Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review Sheldon, Holly Kostrzewa, Audrey Werner, Shannon Audley, Terry Biggs, Adam Mancuso, Taylor Picone, Mary Frances Innov Pharm Original Research Background: Though The Joint Commission requires health systems perform annual formulary review, guidance for how to perform this review is lacking. Published methods include comprehensive review of all pharmaceutical classes; however, this approach may not be the most efficient or effective option for a health system with a large formulary. Objective: To create a prioritization system for annual formulary review through development of a pharmaceutical class scoring tool. Methods: Drug information pharmacists developed the scoring tool, which used external and internal data to score pharmaceutical classes in 4 categories: safety, efficacy, cost, and utilization. The primary outcome, number of formulary changes resulting from pharmaceutical class review, was compared between the highest-scoring and lowest-scoring class to assess the tool’s ability to prioritize high-yield class reviews. Results: The tool calculated scores for 91 pharmaceutical classes, altogether containing 962 medications. After review of the highest-scoring class, corticosteroids, 2 formulary changes were made: one dosage form was removed from formulary, and one medication was restricted to outpatient use only. Zero formulary changes resulted from review of the lowest-scoring class, pharmaceutical adjuvants. Conclusions: The tool described in this study prioritized annual formulary review efforts by identifying a pharmaceutical class with meaningful formulary optimization opportunities as the highest-scoring class, while correctly identifying a class with no optimization opportunities as the lowest-scoring class. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9836755/ /pubmed/36654702 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4785 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sheldon, Holly
Kostrzewa, Audrey
Werner, Shannon
Audley, Terry
Biggs, Adam
Mancuso, Taylor
Picone, Mary Frances
Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review
title Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review
title_full Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review
title_fullStr Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review
title_full_unstemmed Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review
title_short Use of an Innovative Pharmaceutical Class Scoring Tool for Prioritized Annual Formulary Review
title_sort use of an innovative pharmaceutical class scoring tool for prioritized annual formulary review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654702
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4785
work_keys_str_mv AT sheldonholly useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview
AT kostrzewaaudrey useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview
AT wernershannon useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview
AT audleyterry useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview
AT biggsadam useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview
AT mancusotaylor useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview
AT piconemaryfrances useofaninnovativepharmaceuticalclassscoringtoolforprioritizedannualformularyreview