Cargando…

Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive abilities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavior Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS), a tool designed for testing cognition in individuals with limited hand motor function. The impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houldsworth, Ceri, Nair, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman, Hariharan, Ram Pankajam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JARM 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703799
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230001
_version_ 1784868962643738624
author Houldsworth, Ceri
Nair, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman
Hariharan, Ram Pankajam
author_facet Houldsworth, Ceri
Nair, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman
Hariharan, Ram Pankajam
author_sort Houldsworth, Ceri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive abilities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavior Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS), a tool designed for testing cognition in individuals with limited hand motor function. The impact of cognitive dysfunction on quality of life was also assessed. METHODS: Forty-one patients with SCI were assessed using ECAS, the brief version of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. RESULTS: Overall, 28 of the 41 participants scored below the cut-off threshold for normal population in ECAS. The domains affected were language, 63%; memory, 51%; executive function, 44%; verbal fluency, 44%; and visuospatial skills, 24%. On multiple regression analysis, the ECAS total score moderately strongly explained the variance in the WHOQOL-BREF psychological (β = 0.428, t = 2.958, P = 0.005) and environmental (β = 0.411, t = 2.819, P = 0.008) domains. ECAS memory scores independently influenced WHOQOL-BREF physical (β = 0.398, t = 2.67, P = 0.011) and environmental (β = 0.37, t = 2.697, P = 0.010) domains. WHOQOL-BREF psychological scores were significantly influenced by ECAS executive scores (β = 0.415, t = 2.85, P = 0.007), whereas the social domain was not significantly influenced by ECAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to use ECAS in individuals with SCI. Cognitive ability influenced the quality of life of people with SCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9836909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JARM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98369092023-01-25 Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury Houldsworth, Ceri Nair, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Hariharan, Ram Pankajam Prog Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive abilities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavior Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS), a tool designed for testing cognition in individuals with limited hand motor function. The impact of cognitive dysfunction on quality of life was also assessed. METHODS: Forty-one patients with SCI were assessed using ECAS, the brief version of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. RESULTS: Overall, 28 of the 41 participants scored below the cut-off threshold for normal population in ECAS. The domains affected were language, 63%; memory, 51%; executive function, 44%; verbal fluency, 44%; and visuospatial skills, 24%. On multiple regression analysis, the ECAS total score moderately strongly explained the variance in the WHOQOL-BREF psychological (β = 0.428, t = 2.958, P = 0.005) and environmental (β = 0.411, t = 2.819, P = 0.008) domains. ECAS memory scores independently influenced WHOQOL-BREF physical (β = 0.398, t = 2.67, P = 0.011) and environmental (β = 0.37, t = 2.697, P = 0.010) domains. WHOQOL-BREF psychological scores were significantly influenced by ECAS executive scores (β = 0.415, t = 2.85, P = 0.007), whereas the social domain was not significantly influenced by ECAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to use ECAS in individuals with SCI. Cognitive ability influenced the quality of life of people with SCI. JARM 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9836909/ /pubmed/36703799 http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230001 Text en 2023 The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Houldsworth, Ceri
Nair, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman
Hariharan, Ram Pankajam
Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury
title Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury
title_full Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury
title_fullStr Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury
title_full_unstemmed Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury
title_short Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury
title_sort cognition and quality of life of people with spinal cord injury
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703799
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230001
work_keys_str_mv AT houldsworthceri cognitionandqualityoflifeofpeoplewithspinalcordinjury
AT nairkrishnanpadmakumarisivaraman cognitionandqualityoflifeofpeoplewithspinalcordinjury
AT hariharanrampankajam cognitionandqualityoflifeofpeoplewithspinalcordinjury