Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre-observational study. OBJECTIVES: The 6-minute walk test (6mWT) is an established assessment of walking function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, walking 6 min can be demanding for severely impaired individuals. The 2-minute walk test (2mWT) could be an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willi, Romina, Widmer, Mario, Merz, Nora, Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G., Zörner, Björn, Bolliger, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00847-1
_version_ 1784868968108916736
author Willi, Romina
Widmer, Mario
Merz, Nora
Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G.
Zörner, Björn
Bolliger, Marc
author_facet Willi, Romina
Widmer, Mario
Merz, Nora
Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G.
Zörner, Björn
Bolliger, Marc
author_sort Willi, Romina
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre-observational study. OBJECTIVES: The 6-minute walk test (6mWT) is an established assessment of walking function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, walking 6 min can be demanding for severely impaired individuals. The 2-minute walk test (2mWT) could be an appropriate alternative that has already been validated in other neurological disorders. The aim of this study was to assess construct validity and test-rest reliability of the 2mWT in individuals with SCI. In addition, the influence of walking performance on sensitivity to change of the 2mWT was assessed. SETTING: Swiss Paraplegic Center Nottwil, Switzerland; Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland. METHODS: Fifty individuals (aged 18–79) with SCI (neurological level of injury: C1-L3, AIS: A-D) were assessed on two test days separated by 1 to 7 days. The first assessment consisted of a 2mWT familiarization, followed by a 2mWT and 10-meter walk test (10MWT) (including the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II)) in randomized order. The second assessment consisted of 2mWT and 6mWT in randomized order. Tests were separated by at least 30 min of rest. RESULTS: The interclass correlation coefficient between the 2mWT assessed on the first and second test day was excellent (r = 0.980, p < 0.001). The 2mWT correlated very strongly with the 6mWT (r = 0.992, p < 0.001) and the 10MWT (r = 0.964, p < 0.001), and moderately with the WISCI II (r = 0.571, p < 0.001). Sensitivity to change was slightly affected by walking performance. CONCLUSION: The 2mWT is a valid and reliable alternative to the 6mWT to measure walking function in individuals with SCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04555759.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9836932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98369322023-01-14 Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury Willi, Romina Widmer, Mario Merz, Nora Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G. Zörner, Björn Bolliger, Marc Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: Multicentre-observational study. OBJECTIVES: The 6-minute walk test (6mWT) is an established assessment of walking function in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, walking 6 min can be demanding for severely impaired individuals. The 2-minute walk test (2mWT) could be an appropriate alternative that has already been validated in other neurological disorders. The aim of this study was to assess construct validity and test-rest reliability of the 2mWT in individuals with SCI. In addition, the influence of walking performance on sensitivity to change of the 2mWT was assessed. SETTING: Swiss Paraplegic Center Nottwil, Switzerland; Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland. METHODS: Fifty individuals (aged 18–79) with SCI (neurological level of injury: C1-L3, AIS: A-D) were assessed on two test days separated by 1 to 7 days. The first assessment consisted of a 2mWT familiarization, followed by a 2mWT and 10-meter walk test (10MWT) (including the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II)) in randomized order. The second assessment consisted of 2mWT and 6mWT in randomized order. Tests were separated by at least 30 min of rest. RESULTS: The interclass correlation coefficient between the 2mWT assessed on the first and second test day was excellent (r = 0.980, p < 0.001). The 2mWT correlated very strongly with the 6mWT (r = 0.992, p < 0.001) and the 10MWT (r = 0.964, p < 0.001), and moderately with the WISCI II (r = 0.571, p < 0.001). Sensitivity to change was slightly affected by walking performance. CONCLUSION: The 2mWT is a valid and reliable alternative to the 6mWT to measure walking function in individuals with SCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04555759. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9836932/ /pubmed/35999254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00847-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Willi, Romina
Widmer, Mario
Merz, Nora
Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G.
Zörner, Björn
Bolliger, Marc
Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
title Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_full Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_short Validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
title_sort validity and reliability of the 2-minute walk test in individuals with spinal cord injury
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9836932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00847-1
work_keys_str_mv AT williromina validityandreliabilityofthe2minutewalktestinindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT widmermario validityandreliabilityofthe2minutewalktestinindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT merznora validityandreliabilityofthe2minutewalktestinindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT bastiaenencarolinehg validityandreliabilityofthe2minutewalktestinindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT zornerbjorn validityandreliabilityofthe2minutewalktestinindividualswithspinalcordinjury
AT bolligermarc validityandreliabilityofthe2minutewalktestinindividualswithspinalcordinjury