Cargando…

Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome

Next-generation sequencing-based microbiological analysis is a complex way to profile vaginal microbiome samples since each step affects the results gained. Methodologies for sample collection lack golden standards. We compared Puritan DNA/RNA swab (PS) and Copan FLOQ swab (CS) and provided consiste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kero, Katja, Hieta, Niina, Kallonen, Teemu, Ahtikoski, Anne, Laine, Hanna K., Rautava, Jaana, Munukka, Eveliina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04545-x
_version_ 1784868983653007360
author Kero, Katja
Hieta, Niina
Kallonen, Teemu
Ahtikoski, Anne
Laine, Hanna K.
Rautava, Jaana
Munukka, Eveliina
author_facet Kero, Katja
Hieta, Niina
Kallonen, Teemu
Ahtikoski, Anne
Laine, Hanna K.
Rautava, Jaana
Munukka, Eveliina
author_sort Kero, Katja
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing-based microbiological analysis is a complex way to profile vaginal microbiome samples since each step affects the results gained. Methodologies for sample collection lack golden standards. We compared Puritan DNA/RNA swab (PS) and Copan FLOQ swab (CS) and provided consistent and reliable microbiome profiles analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We collected two consecutive vaginal samples utilizing PS with room temperature storing and CS with instant freezing from 26 women. Variable region 4 of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with single PCR by custom-designed dual-indexed primers and sequenced with Illumina MiSeq system. Read quality control, operational taxonomic unit tables, and alpha and beta diversities analysis were performed, and community richness, diversity, and evenness were evaluated and compared between the two samplings and tests. Nineteen sample pairs produced detectable, intact DNA during the extraction protocol and/or further microbial profiles. Alpha bacterial diversity indices were independent on the collection protocol. No significant statistical differences were found in the measured beta diversity metrics between the collection methods. Of the women, 43% had Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome profile despite of collection method. Previously reported important vaginal microbiome phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria were present in the sample set although their relative abundances varied among individuals. PS and CS enable constant vaginal microbiota sampling. The PS method with no need for instant freezing is suitable for on-site collections at clinics. Furthermore, it seems to be possible to take two samples instead of one with constant microbiological results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9837015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98370152023-01-14 Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome Kero, Katja Hieta, Niina Kallonen, Teemu Ahtikoski, Anne Laine, Hanna K. Rautava, Jaana Munukka, Eveliina Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Next-generation sequencing-based microbiological analysis is a complex way to profile vaginal microbiome samples since each step affects the results gained. Methodologies for sample collection lack golden standards. We compared Puritan DNA/RNA swab (PS) and Copan FLOQ swab (CS) and provided consistent and reliable microbiome profiles analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We collected two consecutive vaginal samples utilizing PS with room temperature storing and CS with instant freezing from 26 women. Variable region 4 of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with single PCR by custom-designed dual-indexed primers and sequenced with Illumina MiSeq system. Read quality control, operational taxonomic unit tables, and alpha and beta diversities analysis were performed, and community richness, diversity, and evenness were evaluated and compared between the two samplings and tests. Nineteen sample pairs produced detectable, intact DNA during the extraction protocol and/or further microbial profiles. Alpha bacterial diversity indices were independent on the collection protocol. No significant statistical differences were found in the measured beta diversity metrics between the collection methods. Of the women, 43% had Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome profile despite of collection method. Previously reported important vaginal microbiome phyla Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria were present in the sample set although their relative abundances varied among individuals. PS and CS enable constant vaginal microbiota sampling. The PS method with no need for instant freezing is suitable for on-site collections at clinics. Furthermore, it seems to be possible to take two samples instead of one with constant microbiological results. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9837015/ /pubmed/36624297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04545-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kero, Katja
Hieta, Niina
Kallonen, Teemu
Ahtikoski, Anne
Laine, Hanna K.
Rautava, Jaana
Munukka, Eveliina
Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
title Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
title_full Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
title_fullStr Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
title_short Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
title_sort optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-022-04545-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kerokatja optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome
AT hietaniina optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome
AT kallonenteemu optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome
AT ahtikoskianne optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome
AT lainehannak optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome
AT rautavajaana optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome
AT munukkaeveliina optimalsamplingandanalysismethodsforclinicaldiagnosticsofvaginalmicrobiome