Cargando…

Potential inhibitory properties of structurally modified quercetin/isohamnetin glucosides against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro; molecular docking and dynamics simulation strategies

Concerned organizations and individuals are fully engaged in seeking appropriate measures towards managing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SAR-CoV-2) infection because of the unprecedented economic and health impact. SAR-CoV-2 Main protease (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro) is unique to the surviva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adegbola, Peter Ifeoluwa, Fadahunsi, Olumide Samuel, Ogunjinmi, Oluwasayo Esther, Adegbola, Aanuoluwa Eunice, Ojeniyi, Fiyinfoluwa Demilade, Adesanya, Adetayo, Olagoke, Emmanuel, Adisa, Ayobami Damilare, Ehigie, Adeola Folasade, Adetutu, Adewale, Semire, Banjo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36686560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101167
Descripción
Sumario:Concerned organizations and individuals are fully engaged in seeking appropriate measures towards managing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SAR-CoV-2) infection because of the unprecedented economic and health impact. SAR-CoV-2 Main protease (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro) is unique to the survival and viability of the virus. Therefore, inhibition of Mpro can block the viral propagation. Thirty (30) derivatives were built by changing the glucosides in the Meta and para position of quercetin and isohamnetin. Molecular docking analysis was used for the screening of the compounds. Dynamics simulation was performed to assess the stability of the best pose docked complex. Molecular mechanics binding free energy calculation was done by Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MMPBSA). Overall analysis showed that the compounds are allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. Dynamic simulation analysis established the stability of Mpro-ISM-1, Mpro-ISD-3, Mpro-IST-2, Mpro-QM-2, and Mpro-QD-6 complexes with a maximum of 7 hydrogen bonds involved in their interaction. The MMPBSA binding free energies for ISM-1, ISD-3, IST-2, QM-2, and QD-6 were −92.47 ± 9.06, −222.27 ± 32.5, 180.72 ± 47.92, 156.46 ± 49.88 and −93.52 ± 48.75 kcal/mol respectively. All the compounds showed good pharmacokinetic properties, while only ISM-1 inhibits hERG and might be cardio-toxic. Observations in this study established that the glucoside position indeed influenced the affinity for SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The study also suggested the potentials of ISD-3, QM-2 and QD-6 as potent inhibitors of the main protease, further experimental and clinical studies are however necessary to validate and establish the need for further drug development processes. Therefore, future studies will be on the chemical synthesis of the compounds and investigation of the in-vitro inhibition of SARS-CoV-2.