Cargando…

Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?

OBJECTIVE: Ankle fractures are often combined with syndesmotic instability, requiring reduction and stabilization. However, the optimal level for syndesmotic screw positioning remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different syndesmotic screw insertion levels on postoperative cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jin‐Kun, Yu, Yi, Wu, Ying‐Hua, Wang, Jia, Zeng, Xian‐Tie, Zhao, Jia‐Guo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13569
_version_ 1784869028329684992
author Li, Jin‐Kun
Yu, Yi
Wu, Ying‐Hua
Wang, Jia
Zeng, Xian‐Tie
Zhao, Jia‐Guo
author_facet Li, Jin‐Kun
Yu, Yi
Wu, Ying‐Hua
Wang, Jia
Zeng, Xian‐Tie
Zhao, Jia‐Guo
author_sort Li, Jin‐Kun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Ankle fractures are often combined with syndesmotic instability, requiring reduction and stabilization. However, the optimal level for syndesmotic screw positioning remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different syndesmotic screw insertion levels on postoperative clinical outcomes and determine whether an optimal level exists. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from 43 adult patients with acute closed ankle fractures combined with intraoperative evidence of unstable syndesmotic injuries who underwent open reduction internal fixation from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2018 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 43 patients were divided into three groups based on the syndesmotic screw placement level: trans‐syndesmotic group: screw level of 2–3 cm; inferior‐syndesmotic group: screw level <2 cm; and supra‐syndesmotic group: screw level >3 cm. Clinical outcomes were measured at the final follow‐up, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot score, Olerud–Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), short‐form 36‐item questionnaire (SF‐36), visual analogue scale (VAS) score and restrictions in ankle range of motion (ROM). The relationships between screw placement level and clinical outcomes were analyzed with the Kruskal–Wallis H‐test and Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: The median follow‐up duration was 15 months (range, 10–22 months). No patients developed fracture nonunion or malunion or experienced hardware failure. The outcome scoring systems showed an overall score for the entire group of 94.91 points for the AOFAS ankle‐hindfoot score, 83.14 for the OMAS, 96.65 for the SF‐36, 1.77 for the VAS, 9.14° for the restrictions in dorsiflexion, and 1.30° for the restrictions in plantarflexion. There were no significant differences among three groups in clinical outcomes (P > 0.05). Neither the AOFAS score nor OMAS had significant correlations with screw insertion level (P = 0.825 and P = 0.585, respectively). No postoperative arthritis or widening of the tibiofibular space was observed at the final follow‐up. CONCLUSION: Different syndesmotic screw placement levels appear not to affect the clinical outcomes of ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability. No optimal level was observed in this study. Our findings suggest other clinically acceptable options apart from syndesmotic screw placement 2–3 cm above the ankle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9837214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98372142023-01-18 Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability? Li, Jin‐Kun Yu, Yi Wu, Ying‐Hua Wang, Jia Zeng, Xian‐Tie Zhao, Jia‐Guo Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: Ankle fractures are often combined with syndesmotic instability, requiring reduction and stabilization. However, the optimal level for syndesmotic screw positioning remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different syndesmotic screw insertion levels on postoperative clinical outcomes and determine whether an optimal level exists. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from 43 adult patients with acute closed ankle fractures combined with intraoperative evidence of unstable syndesmotic injuries who underwent open reduction internal fixation from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2018 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 43 patients were divided into three groups based on the syndesmotic screw placement level: trans‐syndesmotic group: screw level of 2–3 cm; inferior‐syndesmotic group: screw level <2 cm; and supra‐syndesmotic group: screw level >3 cm. Clinical outcomes were measured at the final follow‐up, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot score, Olerud–Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), short‐form 36‐item questionnaire (SF‐36), visual analogue scale (VAS) score and restrictions in ankle range of motion (ROM). The relationships between screw placement level and clinical outcomes were analyzed with the Kruskal–Wallis H‐test and Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: The median follow‐up duration was 15 months (range, 10–22 months). No patients developed fracture nonunion or malunion or experienced hardware failure. The outcome scoring systems showed an overall score for the entire group of 94.91 points for the AOFAS ankle‐hindfoot score, 83.14 for the OMAS, 96.65 for the SF‐36, 1.77 for the VAS, 9.14° for the restrictions in dorsiflexion, and 1.30° for the restrictions in plantarflexion. There were no significant differences among three groups in clinical outcomes (P > 0.05). Neither the AOFAS score nor OMAS had significant correlations with screw insertion level (P = 0.825 and P = 0.585, respectively). No postoperative arthritis or widening of the tibiofibular space was observed at the final follow‐up. CONCLUSION: Different syndesmotic screw placement levels appear not to affect the clinical outcomes of ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability. No optimal level was observed in this study. Our findings suggest other clinically acceptable options apart from syndesmotic screw placement 2–3 cm above the ankle. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9837214/ /pubmed/36444957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13569 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Li, Jin‐Kun
Yu, Yi
Wu, Ying‐Hua
Wang, Jia
Zeng, Xian‐Tie
Zhao, Jia‐Guo
Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?
title Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?
title_full Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?
title_fullStr Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?
title_short Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?
title_sort does the level of syndesmotic screw insertion affect clinical outcome after ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability?
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13569
work_keys_str_mv AT lijinkun doesthelevelofsyndesmoticscrewinsertionaffectclinicaloutcomeafteranklefractureswithsyndesmoticinstability
AT yuyi doesthelevelofsyndesmoticscrewinsertionaffectclinicaloutcomeafteranklefractureswithsyndesmoticinstability
AT wuyinghua doesthelevelofsyndesmoticscrewinsertionaffectclinicaloutcomeafteranklefractureswithsyndesmoticinstability
AT wangjia doesthelevelofsyndesmoticscrewinsertionaffectclinicaloutcomeafteranklefractureswithsyndesmoticinstability
AT zengxiantie doesthelevelofsyndesmoticscrewinsertionaffectclinicaloutcomeafteranklefractureswithsyndesmoticinstability
AT zhaojiaguo doesthelevelofsyndesmoticscrewinsertionaffectclinicaloutcomeafteranklefractureswithsyndesmoticinstability