Cargando…

User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE: Although clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have many benefits for clinical practice, they also have several barriers to their acceptance by professionals. Our objective in this study was to design and validate The Aleph palliative care (PC) CDSS through a user-centred method, consi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanes-Selva, Vicent, Asensio-Cuesta, Sabina, Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión, Pereira Mesquita, Felipe, García-Gómez, Juan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221150735
_version_ 1784869044870971392
author Blanes-Selva, Vicent
Asensio-Cuesta, Sabina
Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión
Pereira Mesquita, Felipe
García-Gómez, Juan M.
author_facet Blanes-Selva, Vicent
Asensio-Cuesta, Sabina
Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión
Pereira Mesquita, Felipe
García-Gómez, Juan M.
author_sort Blanes-Selva, Vicent
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have many benefits for clinical practice, they also have several barriers to their acceptance by professionals. Our objective in this study was to design and validate The Aleph palliative care (PC) CDSS through a user-centred method, considering the predictions of the artificial intelligence (AI) core, usability and user experience (UX). METHODS: We performed two rounds of individual evaluation sessions with potential users. Each session included a model evaluation, a task test and a usability and UX assessment. RESULTS: The machine learning (ML) predictive models outperformed the participants in the three predictive tasks. System Usability Scale (SUS) reported 62.7  ±  14.1 and 65  ±  26.2 on a 100-point rating scale for both rounds, respectively, while User Experience Questionnaire – Short Version (UEQ-S) scores were 1.42 and 1.5 on the −3 to 3 scale. CONCLUSIONS: The think-aloud method and including the UX dimension helped us to identify most of the workflow implementation issues. The system has good UX hedonic qualities; participants were interested in the tool and responded positively to it. Performance regarding usability was modest but acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9837281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98372812023-01-14 User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals Blanes-Selva, Vicent Asensio-Cuesta, Sabina Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión Pereira Mesquita, Felipe García-Gómez, Juan M. Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Although clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have many benefits for clinical practice, they also have several barriers to their acceptance by professionals. Our objective in this study was to design and validate The Aleph palliative care (PC) CDSS through a user-centred method, considering the predictions of the artificial intelligence (AI) core, usability and user experience (UX). METHODS: We performed two rounds of individual evaluation sessions with potential users. Each session included a model evaluation, a task test and a usability and UX assessment. RESULTS: The machine learning (ML) predictive models outperformed the participants in the three predictive tasks. System Usability Scale (SUS) reported 62.7  ±  14.1 and 65  ±  26.2 on a 100-point rating scale for both rounds, respectively, while User Experience Questionnaire – Short Version (UEQ-S) scores were 1.42 and 1.5 on the −3 to 3 scale. CONCLUSIONS: The think-aloud method and including the UX dimension helped us to identify most of the workflow implementation issues. The system has good UX hedonic qualities; participants were interested in the tool and responded positively to it. Performance regarding usability was modest but acceptable. SAGE Publications 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9837281/ /pubmed/36644661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221150735 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Blanes-Selva, Vicent
Asensio-Cuesta, Sabina
Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión
Pereira Mesquita, Felipe
García-Gómez, Juan M.
User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals
title User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals
title_full User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals
title_fullStr User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals
title_short User-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: Insights from healthcare professionals
title_sort user-centred design of a clinical decision support system for palliative care: insights from healthcare professionals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36644661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076221150735
work_keys_str_mv AT blanesselvavicent usercentreddesignofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemforpalliativecareinsightsfromhealthcareprofessionals
AT asensiocuestasabina usercentreddesignofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemforpalliativecareinsightsfromhealthcareprofessionals
AT donatemartinezascension usercentreddesignofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemforpalliativecareinsightsfromhealthcareprofessionals
AT pereiramesquitafelipe usercentreddesignofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemforpalliativecareinsightsfromhealthcareprofessionals
AT garciagomezjuanm usercentreddesignofaclinicaldecisionsupportsystemforpalliativecareinsightsfromhealthcareprofessionals