Cargando…
The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are frequently accompanied by coagulopathy. Since the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score was first described, subsequent studies from Asia revealed a SIC prevalence of 40–60%. In Europe, however, SIC prevalence in patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36635426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01093-7 |
_version_ | 1784869059142090752 |
---|---|
author | Schmoch, Thomas Möhnle, Patrick Weigand, Markus A. Briegel, Josef Bauer, Michael Bloos, Frank Meybohm, Patrick Keh, Didier Löffler, Markus Elke, Gunnar Brenner, Thorsten Bogatsch, Holger |
author_facet | Schmoch, Thomas Möhnle, Patrick Weigand, Markus A. Briegel, Josef Bauer, Michael Bloos, Frank Meybohm, Patrick Keh, Didier Löffler, Markus Elke, Gunnar Brenner, Thorsten Bogatsch, Holger |
author_sort | Schmoch, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are frequently accompanied by coagulopathy. Since the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score was first described, subsequent studies from Asia revealed a SIC prevalence of 40–60%. In Europe, however, SIC prevalence in patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according to the third international consensus definition (SEPSIS-3) has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: The Critical Care Trials Group of the German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) conducted a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Only patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according SEPSIS-3 were included in this secondary analysis. In a two step approach, SIC prevalence was determined in 267 patients with sepsis but not septic shock (at the time of inclusion) from the “Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis” (HYPRESS) trial. Then, we estimated SIC prevalence in 1,018 patients from the “Effect of Sodium Selenite Administration and Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock” (SISPCT) trial using a simplified SIC score based on the platelet-SIC-subscore (PSSC). Study aims were to assess (i) the prevalence of SIC in patients with SEPSIS-3, (ii) the association of SIC with 90-day mortality and morbidity, (iii) the time when patients become SIC positive during the course of sepsis, and (iv) the value of the PSSC for predicting SIC. RESULTS: In the HYPRESS trial, SIC prevalence was 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5–27.5%). The estimated SIC prevalence in the SISPCT trial was 24.2% (95% CI 21.6–26.9%). In the HYPRESS trial, SIC was associated with significantly higher 90-day mortality (13.9% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.027) and morbidity. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, treatment arm, and (SIC-adapted) SOFA score confirmed the negative association of SIC with survival (p = 0.011). In the SISPCT trial, increased PSSCs were associated with higher 90-day mortality (PSSC 0: 34.4%, PSSC 1: 40.5%, PSSC 2: 53.3%; p < 0.001). In both trials, SIC was already present at sepsis diagnosis or occurred during the following 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: SIC is a clinically relevant complication of sepsis. Although it might be less frequent than previously reported, its occurrence is associated with higher morbidity and mortality and should be interpreted as an early warning sign. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-01093-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9837358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98373582023-01-14 The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials Schmoch, Thomas Möhnle, Patrick Weigand, Markus A. Briegel, Josef Bauer, Michael Bloos, Frank Meybohm, Patrick Keh, Didier Löffler, Markus Elke, Gunnar Brenner, Thorsten Bogatsch, Holger Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Sepsis and septic shock are frequently accompanied by coagulopathy. Since the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) score was first described, subsequent studies from Asia revealed a SIC prevalence of 40–60%. In Europe, however, SIC prevalence in patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according to the third international consensus definition (SEPSIS-3) has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: The Critical Care Trials Group of the German Sepsis Competence Network (SepNet) conducted a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Only patients fulfilling sepsis criteria according SEPSIS-3 were included in this secondary analysis. In a two step approach, SIC prevalence was determined in 267 patients with sepsis but not septic shock (at the time of inclusion) from the “Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis” (HYPRESS) trial. Then, we estimated SIC prevalence in 1,018 patients from the “Effect of Sodium Selenite Administration and Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock” (SISPCT) trial using a simplified SIC score based on the platelet-SIC-subscore (PSSC). Study aims were to assess (i) the prevalence of SIC in patients with SEPSIS-3, (ii) the association of SIC with 90-day mortality and morbidity, (iii) the time when patients become SIC positive during the course of sepsis, and (iv) the value of the PSSC for predicting SIC. RESULTS: In the HYPRESS trial, SIC prevalence was 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5–27.5%). The estimated SIC prevalence in the SISPCT trial was 24.2% (95% CI 21.6–26.9%). In the HYPRESS trial, SIC was associated with significantly higher 90-day mortality (13.9% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.027) and morbidity. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, treatment arm, and (SIC-adapted) SOFA score confirmed the negative association of SIC with survival (p = 0.011). In the SISPCT trial, increased PSSCs were associated with higher 90-day mortality (PSSC 0: 34.4%, PSSC 1: 40.5%, PSSC 2: 53.3%; p < 0.001). In both trials, SIC was already present at sepsis diagnosis or occurred during the following 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: SIC is a clinically relevant complication of sepsis. Although it might be less frequent than previously reported, its occurrence is associated with higher morbidity and mortality and should be interpreted as an early warning sign. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-01093-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9837358/ /pubmed/36635426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01093-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Schmoch, Thomas Möhnle, Patrick Weigand, Markus A. Briegel, Josef Bauer, Michael Bloos, Frank Meybohm, Patrick Keh, Didier Löffler, Markus Elke, Gunnar Brenner, Thorsten Bogatsch, Holger The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials |
title | The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials |
title_full | The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials |
title_short | The prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two German multicenter randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | prevalence of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in patients with sepsis – a secondary analysis of two german multicenter randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36635426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01093-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmochthomas theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT mohnlepatrick theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT weigandmarkusa theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT briegeljosef theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bauermichael theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bloosfrank theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT meybohmpatrick theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kehdidier theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lofflermarkus theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT elkegunnar theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT brennerthorsten theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bogatschholger theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT theprevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT schmochthomas prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT mohnlepatrick prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT weigandmarkusa prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT briegeljosef prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bauermichael prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bloosfrank prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT meybohmpatrick prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kehdidier prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lofflermarkus prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT elkegunnar prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT brennerthorsten prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bogatschholger prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT prevalenceofsepsisinducedcoagulopathyinpatientswithsepsisasecondaryanalysisoftwogermanmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrials |