Cargando…

Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective

BACKGROUND: To achieve adequate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence, Dutch legislation prescribes cooperation between absent employees and employers. Yet, we lack insight into how employees with low levels of education exercise influence over (i.e. self-direct) RTW. OBJECTIVE: This study aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoefsmit, Nicole, Houkes, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205233
_version_ 1784869133500809216
author Hoefsmit, Nicole
Houkes, Inge
author_facet Hoefsmit, Nicole
Houkes, Inge
author_sort Hoefsmit, Nicole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To achieve adequate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence, Dutch legislation prescribes cooperation between absent employees and employers. Yet, we lack insight into how employees with low levels of education exercise influence over (i.e. self-direct) RTW. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to enhance our understanding of: (A) the role that employers play in the self-direction of employees with low levels of education over their RTW; (B) how employers perceive these employees’ efforts (or lack thereof) to self-direct their own RTW; and (C) how employers understand and interpret the behaviours of these employees. Social cognitive theory served as a framework. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with 13 employer representatives using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed in NVivo12 using a template approach. RESULTS: Employers tend to play a guiding, directive role in employees’ RTW. According to employers, employees generally comply with the employers’ decisions and suggestions, whether or not they have tried to realise their own preferences regarding mode and timing of RTW. Employers interpret such employee behaviours from the perspective of environmental (e.g. financial pressures to RTW) and person-related factors (e.g. sickness and RTW perceptions). CONCLUSIONS: Employers, rather than employees direct the employees’ RTW. Employers should give voice to employees and enable them to have more control over their RTW. Future research should acquire more insight in the employees’ perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9837685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98376852023-01-30 Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective Hoefsmit, Nicole Houkes, Inge Work Research Article BACKGROUND: To achieve adequate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence, Dutch legislation prescribes cooperation between absent employees and employers. Yet, we lack insight into how employees with low levels of education exercise influence over (i.e. self-direct) RTW. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to enhance our understanding of: (A) the role that employers play in the self-direction of employees with low levels of education over their RTW; (B) how employers perceive these employees’ efforts (or lack thereof) to self-direct their own RTW; and (C) how employers understand and interpret the behaviours of these employees. Social cognitive theory served as a framework. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with 13 employer representatives using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed in NVivo12 using a template approach. RESULTS: Employers tend to play a guiding, directive role in employees’ RTW. According to employers, employees generally comply with the employers’ decisions and suggestions, whether or not they have tried to realise their own preferences regarding mode and timing of RTW. Employers interpret such employee behaviours from the perspective of environmental (e.g. financial pressures to RTW) and person-related factors (e.g. sickness and RTW perceptions). CONCLUSIONS: Employers, rather than employees direct the employees’ RTW. Employers should give voice to employees and enable them to have more control over their RTW. Future research should acquire more insight in the employees’ perspective. IOS Press 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9837685/ /pubmed/36093655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205233 Text en © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoefsmit, Nicole
Houkes, Inge
Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective
title Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective
title_full Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective
title_fullStr Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective
title_full_unstemmed Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective
title_short Return to work of employees with low levels of education: The employers’ role and perspective
title_sort return to work of employees with low levels of education: the employers’ role and perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205233
work_keys_str_mv AT hoefsmitnicole returntoworkofemployeeswithlowlevelsofeducationtheemployersroleandperspective
AT houkesinge returntoworkofemployeeswithlowlevelsofeducationtheemployersroleandperspective