Cargando…

Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence

BACKGROUND: Basic thoracic ultrasound is being used more frequently by clinicians in several settings due to its high diagnostic accuracy for many common causes of respiratory failure and dyspnoea. However, ultrasound examinations are operator-dependent, and sufficient competences are needed to obta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pietersen, Pia Iben, Bhatnagar, Rahul, Andreasen, Freja, Konge, Lars, Laursen, Christian Borbjerg, Rahman, Najib, Nielsen, Anders Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4
_version_ 1784869170308972544
author Pietersen, Pia Iben
Bhatnagar, Rahul
Andreasen, Freja
Konge, Lars
Laursen, Christian Borbjerg
Rahman, Najib
Nielsen, Anders Bo
author_facet Pietersen, Pia Iben
Bhatnagar, Rahul
Andreasen, Freja
Konge, Lars
Laursen, Christian Borbjerg
Rahman, Najib
Nielsen, Anders Bo
author_sort Pietersen, Pia Iben
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Basic thoracic ultrasound is being used more frequently by clinicians in several settings due to its high diagnostic accuracy for many common causes of respiratory failure and dyspnoea. However, ultrasound examinations are operator-dependent, and sufficient competences are needed to obtain high sensitivity and specificity of examinations. Additionally, it is crucial for ultrasound operators to perceive the competence to interpret the images and integrate them into the patient history and other examinations. This study aims to explore and gather validity evidence for an objective structured clinical examination test of basic thoracic ultrasound competences and establish a pass/fail score. METHODS: An expert panel created the test which included two theoretical and five practical stations representing cases with different diagnoses that cause respiratory symptoms and which are possible to establish by basic thoracic ultrasound. Twenty-five participants with different levels of experience in basic thoracic ultrasound completed the test. Data of the test scores were used for item analysis, and exploring validity evidence was done according to Messick’s framework which is recommended. The contrasting groups' standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score. RESULTS: The summarised internal consistency reliability was high with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. The novice group (n = 4) had a mean test score of 42 ± 10.1 points, the intermediate group (n = 8) scored 79.1 ± 8.1 points, and the experienced group (n = 13) 89.0 ± 6.2 points (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). A pass/fail score of 71 points was thus derived (maximum test score = 105 points). CONCLUSION: We developed a test for the assessment of clinical competences in basic thoracic ultrasound with solid validity evidence, and a pass/fail standard with no false positives or false negatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9837899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98378992023-01-14 Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence Pietersen, Pia Iben Bhatnagar, Rahul Andreasen, Freja Konge, Lars Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Rahman, Najib Nielsen, Anders Bo BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Basic thoracic ultrasound is being used more frequently by clinicians in several settings due to its high diagnostic accuracy for many common causes of respiratory failure and dyspnoea. However, ultrasound examinations are operator-dependent, and sufficient competences are needed to obtain high sensitivity and specificity of examinations. Additionally, it is crucial for ultrasound operators to perceive the competence to interpret the images and integrate them into the patient history and other examinations. This study aims to explore and gather validity evidence for an objective structured clinical examination test of basic thoracic ultrasound competences and establish a pass/fail score. METHODS: An expert panel created the test which included two theoretical and five practical stations representing cases with different diagnoses that cause respiratory symptoms and which are possible to establish by basic thoracic ultrasound. Twenty-five participants with different levels of experience in basic thoracic ultrasound completed the test. Data of the test scores were used for item analysis, and exploring validity evidence was done according to Messick’s framework which is recommended. The contrasting groups' standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score. RESULTS: The summarised internal consistency reliability was high with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. The novice group (n = 4) had a mean test score of 42 ± 10.1 points, the intermediate group (n = 8) scored 79.1 ± 8.1 points, and the experienced group (n = 13) 89.0 ± 6.2 points (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). A pass/fail score of 71 points was thus derived (maximum test score = 105 points). CONCLUSION: We developed a test for the assessment of clinical competences in basic thoracic ultrasound with solid validity evidence, and a pass/fail standard with no false positives or false negatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4. BioMed Central 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9837899/ /pubmed/36639627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pietersen, Pia Iben
Bhatnagar, Rahul
Andreasen, Freja
Konge, Lars
Laursen, Christian Borbjerg
Rahman, Najib
Nielsen, Anders Bo
Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
title Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
title_full Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
title_fullStr Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
title_full_unstemmed Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
title_short Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
title_sort objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a european study of validity evidence
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pietersenpiaiben objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence
AT bhatnagarrahul objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence
AT andreasenfreja objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence
AT kongelars objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence
AT laursenchristianborbjerg objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence
AT rahmannajib objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence
AT nielsenandersbo objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence