Cargando…
Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence
BACKGROUND: Basic thoracic ultrasound is being used more frequently by clinicians in several settings due to its high diagnostic accuracy for many common causes of respiratory failure and dyspnoea. However, ultrasound examinations are operator-dependent, and sufficient competences are needed to obta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4 |
_version_ | 1784869170308972544 |
---|---|
author | Pietersen, Pia Iben Bhatnagar, Rahul Andreasen, Freja Konge, Lars Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Rahman, Najib Nielsen, Anders Bo |
author_facet | Pietersen, Pia Iben Bhatnagar, Rahul Andreasen, Freja Konge, Lars Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Rahman, Najib Nielsen, Anders Bo |
author_sort | Pietersen, Pia Iben |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Basic thoracic ultrasound is being used more frequently by clinicians in several settings due to its high diagnostic accuracy for many common causes of respiratory failure and dyspnoea. However, ultrasound examinations are operator-dependent, and sufficient competences are needed to obtain high sensitivity and specificity of examinations. Additionally, it is crucial for ultrasound operators to perceive the competence to interpret the images and integrate them into the patient history and other examinations. This study aims to explore and gather validity evidence for an objective structured clinical examination test of basic thoracic ultrasound competences and establish a pass/fail score. METHODS: An expert panel created the test which included two theoretical and five practical stations representing cases with different diagnoses that cause respiratory symptoms and which are possible to establish by basic thoracic ultrasound. Twenty-five participants with different levels of experience in basic thoracic ultrasound completed the test. Data of the test scores were used for item analysis, and exploring validity evidence was done according to Messick’s framework which is recommended. The contrasting groups' standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score. RESULTS: The summarised internal consistency reliability was high with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. The novice group (n = 4) had a mean test score of 42 ± 10.1 points, the intermediate group (n = 8) scored 79.1 ± 8.1 points, and the experienced group (n = 13) 89.0 ± 6.2 points (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). A pass/fail score of 71 points was thus derived (maximum test score = 105 points). CONCLUSION: We developed a test for the assessment of clinical competences in basic thoracic ultrasound with solid validity evidence, and a pass/fail standard with no false positives or false negatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9837899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98378992023-01-14 Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence Pietersen, Pia Iben Bhatnagar, Rahul Andreasen, Freja Konge, Lars Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Rahman, Najib Nielsen, Anders Bo BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Basic thoracic ultrasound is being used more frequently by clinicians in several settings due to its high diagnostic accuracy for many common causes of respiratory failure and dyspnoea. However, ultrasound examinations are operator-dependent, and sufficient competences are needed to obtain high sensitivity and specificity of examinations. Additionally, it is crucial for ultrasound operators to perceive the competence to interpret the images and integrate them into the patient history and other examinations. This study aims to explore and gather validity evidence for an objective structured clinical examination test of basic thoracic ultrasound competences and establish a pass/fail score. METHODS: An expert panel created the test which included two theoretical and five practical stations representing cases with different diagnoses that cause respiratory symptoms and which are possible to establish by basic thoracic ultrasound. Twenty-five participants with different levels of experience in basic thoracic ultrasound completed the test. Data of the test scores were used for item analysis, and exploring validity evidence was done according to Messick’s framework which is recommended. The contrasting groups' standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score. RESULTS: The summarised internal consistency reliability was high with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. The novice group (n = 4) had a mean test score of 42 ± 10.1 points, the intermediate group (n = 8) scored 79.1 ± 8.1 points, and the experienced group (n = 13) 89.0 ± 6.2 points (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). A pass/fail score of 71 points was thus derived (maximum test score = 105 points). CONCLUSION: We developed a test for the assessment of clinical competences in basic thoracic ultrasound with solid validity evidence, and a pass/fail standard with no false positives or false negatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4. BioMed Central 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9837899/ /pubmed/36639627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pietersen, Pia Iben Bhatnagar, Rahul Andreasen, Freja Konge, Lars Laursen, Christian Borbjerg Rahman, Najib Nielsen, Anders Bo Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence |
title | Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence |
title_full | Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence |
title_fullStr | Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence |
title_short | Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence |
title_sort | objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a european study of validity evidence |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9837899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02285-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pietersenpiaiben objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence AT bhatnagarrahul objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence AT andreasenfreja objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence AT kongelars objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence AT laursenchristianborbjerg objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence AT rahmannajib objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence AT nielsenandersbo objectivestructuredclinicalexaminationinbasicthoracicultrasoundaeuropeanstudyofvalidityevidence |