Cargando…

The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?

Relationships between tree size and water use indicate how soil water is partitioned between differently sized individuals, and hence competition for water. These relationships are rarely examined, let alone whether there is consistency in shape across populations. Competition for water among plants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forrester, David I, Limousin, Jean-Marc, Pfautsch, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpac018
_version_ 1784869212499476480
author Forrester, David I
Limousin, Jean-Marc
Pfautsch, Sebastian
author_facet Forrester, David I
Limousin, Jean-Marc
Pfautsch, Sebastian
author_sort Forrester, David I
collection PubMed
description Relationships between tree size and water use indicate how soil water is partitioned between differently sized individuals, and hence competition for water. These relationships are rarely examined, let alone whether there is consistency in shape across populations. Competition for water among plants is often assumed to be size-symmetric, i.e., exponents (b(1)) of power functions (water use ∝ biomass(b1)) equal to 1, with all sizes using the same amount of water proportionally to their size. We tested the hypothesis that b(1) actually varies greatly, and based on allometric theory, that b(1) is only centered around 1 when size is quantified as basal area or sapwood area (not diameter). We also examined whether b(1) varies spatially and temporally in relation to stand structure (height and density) and climate. Tree water use ∝ size(b1) power functions were fitted for 80 species and 103 sites using the global SAPFLUXNET database. The b(1) were centered around 1 when tree size was given as basal area or sapwood area, but not as diameter. The 95% confidence intervals of b(1) included the theoretical predictions for the scaling of plant vascular networks. b(1) changed through time within a given stand for the species with the longest time series, such that larger trees gained an advantage during warmer and wetter conditions. Spatial comparisons across the entire dataset showed that b(1) correlated only weakly (R(2) < 12%) with stand structure or climate, suggesting that inter-specific variability in b(1) and hence the symmetry of competition for water may be largely related to inter-specific differences in tree architecture or physiology rather than to climate or stand structure. In conclusion, size-symmetric competition for water (b(1) ≈ 1) may only be assumed when size is quantified as basal area or sapwood area, and when describing a general pattern across forest types and species. There is substantial deviation in b(1) between individual stands and species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9838098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98380982023-01-17 The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric? Forrester, David I Limousin, Jean-Marc Pfautsch, Sebastian Tree Physiol Research Paper Relationships between tree size and water use indicate how soil water is partitioned between differently sized individuals, and hence competition for water. These relationships are rarely examined, let alone whether there is consistency in shape across populations. Competition for water among plants is often assumed to be size-symmetric, i.e., exponents (b(1)) of power functions (water use ∝ biomass(b1)) equal to 1, with all sizes using the same amount of water proportionally to their size. We tested the hypothesis that b(1) actually varies greatly, and based on allometric theory, that b(1) is only centered around 1 when size is quantified as basal area or sapwood area (not diameter). We also examined whether b(1) varies spatially and temporally in relation to stand structure (height and density) and climate. Tree water use ∝ size(b1) power functions were fitted for 80 species and 103 sites using the global SAPFLUXNET database. The b(1) were centered around 1 when tree size was given as basal area or sapwood area, but not as diameter. The 95% confidence intervals of b(1) included the theoretical predictions for the scaling of plant vascular networks. b(1) changed through time within a given stand for the species with the longest time series, such that larger trees gained an advantage during warmer and wetter conditions. Spatial comparisons across the entire dataset showed that b(1) correlated only weakly (R(2) < 12%) with stand structure or climate, suggesting that inter-specific variability in b(1) and hence the symmetry of competition for water may be largely related to inter-specific differences in tree architecture or physiology rather than to climate or stand structure. In conclusion, size-symmetric competition for water (b(1) ≈ 1) may only be assumed when size is quantified as basal area or sapwood area, and when describing a general pattern across forest types and species. There is substantial deviation in b(1) between individual stands and species. Oxford University Press 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9838098/ /pubmed/35157081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpac018 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Forrester, David I
Limousin, Jean-Marc
Pfautsch, Sebastian
The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
title The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
title_full The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
title_fullStr The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
title_short The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
title_sort relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpac018
work_keys_str_mv AT forresterdavidi therelationshipbetweentreesizeandtreewateruseiscompetitionforwatersizesymmetricorsizeasymmetric
AT limousinjeanmarc therelationshipbetweentreesizeandtreewateruseiscompetitionforwatersizesymmetricorsizeasymmetric
AT pfautschsebastian therelationshipbetweentreesizeandtreewateruseiscompetitionforwatersizesymmetricorsizeasymmetric
AT forresterdavidi relationshipbetweentreesizeandtreewateruseiscompetitionforwatersizesymmetricorsizeasymmetric
AT limousinjeanmarc relationshipbetweentreesizeandtreewateruseiscompetitionforwatersizesymmetricorsizeasymmetric
AT pfautschsebastian relationshipbetweentreesizeandtreewateruseiscompetitionforwatersizesymmetricorsizeasymmetric