Cargando…
Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12876 |
_version_ | 1784869314301526016 |
---|---|
author | Mowbray, Fabrice I. Heckman, George Hirdes, John P. Costa, Andrew P. Beauchet, Olivier Eagles, Debra Perry, Jeffrey J. Sinha, Samir Archambault, Patrick Wang, Hanting Jantzi, Michaela Hebert, Paul |
author_facet | Mowbray, Fabrice I. Heckman, George Hirdes, John P. Costa, Andrew P. Beauchet, Olivier Eagles, Debra Perry, Jeffrey J. Sinha, Samir Archambault, Patrick Wang, Hanting Jantzi, Michaela Hebert, Paul |
author_sort | Mowbray, Fabrice I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge home and extended ED length of stay (>24 hours). METHODS: We conducted a multiprovince prospective cohort study in Canada. The need for detailed geriatric assessment was determined using the interRAI ED Screener and the interRAI ED Contact Assessment as the reference standard. A score of ≥5 was used to classify high‐risk patients. Assessments were conducted by emergency and research nurses. We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and false discovery rate of the interRAI ED Screener. We employed logistic regression to predict ED outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, academic status, and the province of care. RESULTS: A total of 5629 older ED patients across 11 ED sites were evaluated using the interRAI ED Screener and 1061 were evaluated with the interRAI ED Contact Assessment. Approximately one‐third of patients were discharged home or experienced an extended ED length of stay. The interRAI ED Screener had a sensitivity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a false discovery rate of 18%. The interRAI ED Screener predicted discharge home and extended ED length of stay with fair accuracy. CONCLUSION: The interRAI ED Screener is able to accurately and rapidly identify individuals with medical complexity. The interRAI ED Screener predicts patient‐important health outcomes in older ED patients, highlighting its value for vulnerability screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9838565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98385652023-01-18 Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study Mowbray, Fabrice I. Heckman, George Hirdes, John P. Costa, Andrew P. Beauchet, Olivier Eagles, Debra Perry, Jeffrey J. Sinha, Samir Archambault, Patrick Wang, Hanting Jantzi, Michaela Hebert, Paul J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Geriatrics OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge home and extended ED length of stay (>24 hours). METHODS: We conducted a multiprovince prospective cohort study in Canada. The need for detailed geriatric assessment was determined using the interRAI ED Screener and the interRAI ED Contact Assessment as the reference standard. A score of ≥5 was used to classify high‐risk patients. Assessments were conducted by emergency and research nurses. We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and false discovery rate of the interRAI ED Screener. We employed logistic regression to predict ED outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, academic status, and the province of care. RESULTS: A total of 5629 older ED patients across 11 ED sites were evaluated using the interRAI ED Screener and 1061 were evaluated with the interRAI ED Contact Assessment. Approximately one‐third of patients were discharged home or experienced an extended ED length of stay. The interRAI ED Screener had a sensitivity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a false discovery rate of 18%. The interRAI ED Screener predicted discharge home and extended ED length of stay with fair accuracy. CONCLUSION: The interRAI ED Screener is able to accurately and rapidly identify individuals with medical complexity. The interRAI ED Screener predicts patient‐important health outcomes in older ED patients, highlighting its value for vulnerability screening. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9838565/ /pubmed/36660313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12876 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Geriatrics Mowbray, Fabrice I. Heckman, George Hirdes, John P. Costa, Andrew P. Beauchet, Olivier Eagles, Debra Perry, Jeffrey J. Sinha, Samir Archambault, Patrick Wang, Hanting Jantzi, Michaela Hebert, Paul Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
title | Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
title_full | Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
title_short | Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
title_sort | examining the utility and accuracy of the interrai emergency department screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: a canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study |
topic | Geriatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mowbrayfabricei examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT heckmangeorge examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT hirdesjohnp examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT costaandrewp examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT beauchetolivier examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT eaglesdebra examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT perryjeffreyj examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT sinhasamir examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT archambaultpatrick examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT wanghanting examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT jantzimichaela examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy AT hebertpaul examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy |