Cargando…

Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mowbray, Fabrice I., Heckman, George, Hirdes, John P., Costa, Andrew P., Beauchet, Olivier, Eagles, Debra, Perry, Jeffrey J., Sinha, Samir, Archambault, Patrick, Wang, Hanting, Jantzi, Michaela, Hebert, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12876
_version_ 1784869314301526016
author Mowbray, Fabrice I.
Heckman, George
Hirdes, John P.
Costa, Andrew P.
Beauchet, Olivier
Eagles, Debra
Perry, Jeffrey J.
Sinha, Samir
Archambault, Patrick
Wang, Hanting
Jantzi, Michaela
Hebert, Paul
author_facet Mowbray, Fabrice I.
Heckman, George
Hirdes, John P.
Costa, Andrew P.
Beauchet, Olivier
Eagles, Debra
Perry, Jeffrey J.
Sinha, Samir
Archambault, Patrick
Wang, Hanting
Jantzi, Michaela
Hebert, Paul
author_sort Mowbray, Fabrice I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge home and extended ED length of stay (>24 hours). METHODS: We conducted a multiprovince prospective cohort study in Canada. The need for detailed geriatric assessment was determined using the interRAI ED Screener and the interRAI ED Contact Assessment as the reference standard. A score of ≥5 was used to classify high‐risk patients. Assessments were conducted by emergency and research nurses. We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and false discovery rate of the interRAI ED Screener. We employed logistic regression to predict ED outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, academic status, and the province of care. RESULTS: A total of 5629 older ED patients across 11 ED sites were evaluated using the interRAI ED Screener and 1061 were evaluated with the interRAI ED Contact Assessment. Approximately one‐third of patients were discharged home or experienced an extended ED length of stay. The interRAI ED Screener had a sensitivity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a false discovery rate of 18%. The interRAI ED Screener predicted discharge home and extended ED length of stay with fair accuracy. CONCLUSION: The interRAI ED Screener is able to accurately and rapidly identify individuals with medical complexity. The interRAI ED Screener predicts patient‐important health outcomes in older ED patients, highlighting its value for vulnerability screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9838565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98385652023-01-18 Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study Mowbray, Fabrice I. Heckman, George Hirdes, John P. Costa, Andrew P. Beauchet, Olivier Eagles, Debra Perry, Jeffrey J. Sinha, Samir Archambault, Patrick Wang, Hanting Jantzi, Michaela Hebert, Paul J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Geriatrics OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge home and extended ED length of stay (>24 hours). METHODS: We conducted a multiprovince prospective cohort study in Canada. The need for detailed geriatric assessment was determined using the interRAI ED Screener and the interRAI ED Contact Assessment as the reference standard. A score of ≥5 was used to classify high‐risk patients. Assessments were conducted by emergency and research nurses. We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and false discovery rate of the interRAI ED Screener. We employed logistic regression to predict ED outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, academic status, and the province of care. RESULTS: A total of 5629 older ED patients across 11 ED sites were evaluated using the interRAI ED Screener and 1061 were evaluated with the interRAI ED Contact Assessment. Approximately one‐third of patients were discharged home or experienced an extended ED length of stay. The interRAI ED Screener had a sensitivity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a false discovery rate of 18%. The interRAI ED Screener predicted discharge home and extended ED length of stay with fair accuracy. CONCLUSION: The interRAI ED Screener is able to accurately and rapidly identify individuals with medical complexity. The interRAI ED Screener predicts patient‐important health outcomes in older ED patients, highlighting its value for vulnerability screening. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9838565/ /pubmed/36660313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12876 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Geriatrics
Mowbray, Fabrice I.
Heckman, George
Hirdes, John P.
Costa, Andrew P.
Beauchet, Olivier
Eagles, Debra
Perry, Jeffrey J.
Sinha, Samir
Archambault, Patrick
Wang, Hanting
Jantzi, Michaela
Hebert, Paul
Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
title Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
title_full Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
title_short Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
title_sort examining the utility and accuracy of the interrai emergency department screener in identifying high‐risk older emergency department patients: a canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study
topic Geriatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12876
work_keys_str_mv AT mowbrayfabricei examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT heckmangeorge examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT hirdesjohnp examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT costaandrewp examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT beauchetolivier examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT eaglesdebra examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT perryjeffreyj examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT sinhasamir examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT archambaultpatrick examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT wanghanting examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT jantzimichaela examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy
AT hebertpaul examiningtheutilityandaccuracyoftheinterraiemergencydepartmentscreenerinidentifyinghighriskolderemergencydepartmentpatientsacanadianmultiprovinceprospectivecohortstudy