Cargando…

Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites

BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the concurrent development of vaccines offered a rare and somewhat unprecedented opportunity to study antivaccination behavior as it formed over time via the use of archived versions of websites. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess how existing ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaplan, Samantha, von Isenburg, Megan, Waldrop, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40291
_version_ 1784869340339765248
author Kaplan, Samantha
von Isenburg, Megan
Waldrop, Lucy
author_facet Kaplan, Samantha
von Isenburg, Megan
Waldrop, Lucy
author_sort Kaplan, Samantha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the concurrent development of vaccines offered a rare and somewhat unprecedented opportunity to study antivaccination behavior as it formed over time via the use of archived versions of websites. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess how existing antivaccination websites modified their content to address COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic restrictions. METHODS: Using a preexisting collection of 25 antivaccination websites curated by the IvyPlus Web Collection Program prior to the pandemic and crawled every 6 months via Archive-It, we conducted a content analysis to see how these websites acknowledged or ignored COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic restrictions. Websites were assessed for financial behaviors such as having storefronts, mention of COVID-19 vaccines in general or by manufacturer name, references to personal freedom such as masking, safety concerns like side effects, and skepticism of science. RESULTS: The majority of websites addressed COVID-19 vaccines in a negative fashion, with more websites making appeals to personal freedom or expressing skepticism of science than questioning safety. This can potentially be attributed to the lack of available safety data about the vaccines at the time of data collection. Many of the antivaccination websites we evaluated actively sought donations and had a membership option, evidencing these websites have financial motivations and actively build a community around these issues. The content analysis also offered the opportunity to test the viability of archived websites for use in scholarly research. The archived versions of the websites had significant shortcomings, particularly in search functionality, and required supplementation with the live websites. For web archiving to be a viable source of stand-alone content for research, the technology needs to make significant improvements in its capture abilities. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we found antivaccination websites existing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic largely adapted their messaging to address COVID-19 vaccines with very few sites ignoring the pandemic altogether. This study also demonstrated the timely and significant need for more robust web archiving capabilities as web-based environments become more ephemeral and unstable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9838720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98387202023-01-14 Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites Kaplan, Samantha von Isenburg, Megan Waldrop, Lucy JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the concurrent development of vaccines offered a rare and somewhat unprecedented opportunity to study antivaccination behavior as it formed over time via the use of archived versions of websites. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess how existing antivaccination websites modified their content to address COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic restrictions. METHODS: Using a preexisting collection of 25 antivaccination websites curated by the IvyPlus Web Collection Program prior to the pandemic and crawled every 6 months via Archive-It, we conducted a content analysis to see how these websites acknowledged or ignored COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic restrictions. Websites were assessed for financial behaviors such as having storefronts, mention of COVID-19 vaccines in general or by manufacturer name, references to personal freedom such as masking, safety concerns like side effects, and skepticism of science. RESULTS: The majority of websites addressed COVID-19 vaccines in a negative fashion, with more websites making appeals to personal freedom or expressing skepticism of science than questioning safety. This can potentially be attributed to the lack of available safety data about the vaccines at the time of data collection. Many of the antivaccination websites we evaluated actively sought donations and had a membership option, evidencing these websites have financial motivations and actively build a community around these issues. The content analysis also offered the opportunity to test the viability of archived websites for use in scholarly research. The archived versions of the websites had significant shortcomings, particularly in search functionality, and required supplementation with the live websites. For web archiving to be a viable source of stand-alone content for research, the technology needs to make significant improvements in its capture abilities. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we found antivaccination websites existing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic largely adapted their messaging to address COVID-19 vaccines with very few sites ignoring the pandemic altogether. This study also demonstrated the timely and significant need for more robust web archiving capabilities as web-based environments become more ephemeral and unstable. JMIR Publications 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9838720/ /pubmed/36548948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40291 Text en ©Samantha Kaplan, Megan von Isenburg, Lucy Waldrop. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 11.01.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kaplan, Samantha
von Isenburg, Megan
Waldrop, Lucy
Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites
title Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites
title_full Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites
title_fullStr Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites
title_full_unstemmed Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites
title_short Prepandemic Antivaccination Websites' COVID-19 Vaccine Behavior: Content Analysis of Archived Websites
title_sort prepandemic antivaccination websites' covid-19 vaccine behavior: content analysis of archived websites
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40291
work_keys_str_mv AT kaplansamantha prepandemicantivaccinationwebsitescovid19vaccinebehaviorcontentanalysisofarchivedwebsites
AT vonisenburgmegan prepandemicantivaccinationwebsitescovid19vaccinebehaviorcontentanalysisofarchivedwebsites
AT waldroplucy prepandemicantivaccinationwebsitescovid19vaccinebehaviorcontentanalysisofarchivedwebsites