Cargando…

Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous granulomatous disorders (CGDs) can share some features, but an accurate assessment of various findings and their pattern can be useful in differentiating them. In addition to common dermoscopic findings for CGDs, some peculiar dermoscopic characteristics can be helpful in disti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalantari, Yasamin, Peymanfar, Amir Abbas, Mahmoudi, Hamidreza, Daneshpazhooh, Maryam, Etesami, Ifa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13273
_version_ 1784869345501904896
author Kalantari, Yasamin
Peymanfar, Amir Abbas
Mahmoudi, Hamidreza
Daneshpazhooh, Maryam
Etesami, Ifa
author_facet Kalantari, Yasamin
Peymanfar, Amir Abbas
Mahmoudi, Hamidreza
Daneshpazhooh, Maryam
Etesami, Ifa
author_sort Kalantari, Yasamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cutaneous granulomatous disorders (CGDs) can share some features, but an accurate assessment of various findings and their pattern can be useful in differentiating them. In addition to common dermoscopic findings for CGDs, some peculiar dermoscopic characteristics can be helpful in distinguishing them. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we aimed to evaluate dermoscopic findings in patients with CGDs and determine the dermoscopic criteria that could suggest the type of granulomatous disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 107 cases including 75 (70.09%) males and 32 (29.90%) females with an established diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 49), cutaneous sarcoidosis (n = 23), granuloma annulare (GA) (n = 18), and tattoo granuloma (n = 17) confirmed by clinical and pathological studies were included. Based on the previous studies available in the literature, we wrote a checklist containing dermoscopic features of CGDs. Afterward, two dermatologists independently reviewed all dermoscopic images for the presence or absence of each item on the checklist. Descriptive analysis, fisher exact, chi‐square, and t‐test were used. The granulomatous disorders with larger sample sizes were selected for further analysis, including the univariate and conditional multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: The most prevalent nonvascular findings in all of our CGD patients were white scaling (N = 67%, 62.61%), diffuse or localized orange structureless areas (N = 53%, 49.53%), and diffuse erythema (N = 48%, 44.85%). Furthermore, the most frequent vascular findings in all of our CGD cases were branching and arborizing vessels (N = 30%, 28.03%), linear irregular (N = 30%, 28.03%), and dotted vessels (N = 27%, 25.23%). CONCLUSION: For differentiating leishmaniasis from sarcoidosis by dermoscopy, white scaling and white scarring areas are more suggestive of cutaneous leishmaniasis, whereas the presence of arborizing vessels would be more in favor of sarcoidosis. When comparing GA to cutaneous leishmaniasis, the latter significantly shows more linear irregular vessels, hairpin vessels, white scaling, and white scarring areas. In the case of differentiating sarcoidosis from GA, the presence of hairpin vessels would be suggestive of sarcoidosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9838750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98387502023-04-13 Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases Kalantari, Yasamin Peymanfar, Amir Abbas Mahmoudi, Hamidreza Daneshpazhooh, Maryam Etesami, Ifa Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Cutaneous granulomatous disorders (CGDs) can share some features, but an accurate assessment of various findings and their pattern can be useful in differentiating them. In addition to common dermoscopic findings for CGDs, some peculiar dermoscopic characteristics can be helpful in distinguishing them. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we aimed to evaluate dermoscopic findings in patients with CGDs and determine the dermoscopic criteria that could suggest the type of granulomatous disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 107 cases including 75 (70.09%) males and 32 (29.90%) females with an established diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 49), cutaneous sarcoidosis (n = 23), granuloma annulare (GA) (n = 18), and tattoo granuloma (n = 17) confirmed by clinical and pathological studies were included. Based on the previous studies available in the literature, we wrote a checklist containing dermoscopic features of CGDs. Afterward, two dermatologists independently reviewed all dermoscopic images for the presence or absence of each item on the checklist. Descriptive analysis, fisher exact, chi‐square, and t‐test were used. The granulomatous disorders with larger sample sizes were selected for further analysis, including the univariate and conditional multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: The most prevalent nonvascular findings in all of our CGD patients were white scaling (N = 67%, 62.61%), diffuse or localized orange structureless areas (N = 53%, 49.53%), and diffuse erythema (N = 48%, 44.85%). Furthermore, the most frequent vascular findings in all of our CGD cases were branching and arborizing vessels (N = 30%, 28.03%), linear irregular (N = 30%, 28.03%), and dotted vessels (N = 27%, 25.23%). CONCLUSION: For differentiating leishmaniasis from sarcoidosis by dermoscopy, white scaling and white scarring areas are more suggestive of cutaneous leishmaniasis, whereas the presence of arborizing vessels would be more in favor of sarcoidosis. When comparing GA to cutaneous leishmaniasis, the latter significantly shows more linear irregular vessels, hairpin vessels, white scaling, and white scarring areas. In the case of differentiating sarcoidosis from GA, the presence of hairpin vessels would be suggestive of sarcoidosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9838750/ /pubmed/36704887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13273 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kalantari, Yasamin
Peymanfar, Amir Abbas
Mahmoudi, Hamidreza
Daneshpazhooh, Maryam
Etesami, Ifa
Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases
title Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases
title_full Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases
title_fullStr Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases
title_full_unstemmed Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases
title_short Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases
title_sort dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: a study of 107 cases
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13273
work_keys_str_mv AT kalantariyasamin dermoscopyofcutaneousgranulomatousdisordersastudyof107cases
AT peymanfaramirabbas dermoscopyofcutaneousgranulomatousdisordersastudyof107cases
AT mahmoudihamidreza dermoscopyofcutaneousgranulomatousdisordersastudyof107cases
AT daneshpazhoohmaryam dermoscopyofcutaneousgranulomatousdisordersastudyof107cases
AT etesamiifa dermoscopyofcutaneousgranulomatousdisordersastudyof107cases