Cargando…
Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
INTRODUCTION: Large bone defects are challenging for surgeons. Available reimplanted bone substitutes can’t properly restore optimal function along and long term osteointegration of the bone graft. Bone substitute based on the perfusion-decellularization technique seem to be interesting in order to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36638107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280193 |
_version_ | 1784869367795679232 |
---|---|
author | Heller, Ugo Evrard, Robin Lengelé, Benoit Schubert, Thomas Kadlub, Natacha Boisson, Jean |
author_facet | Heller, Ugo Evrard, Robin Lengelé, Benoit Schubert, Thomas Kadlub, Natacha Boisson, Jean |
author_sort | Heller, Ugo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Large bone defects are challenging for surgeons. Available reimplanted bone substitutes can’t properly restore optimal function along and long term osteointegration of the bone graft. Bone substitute based on the perfusion-decellularization technique seem to be interesting in order to overcome these limitations. We present here an evaluation of the biomechanics of the bones thus obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two decellularization protocols were chosen for this study. One using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) (D1) and one using NaOH and H2O2 (D2). The decellularization was performed on porcine forearms. We then carried out compression, three-point bending, indentation and screw pull-out tests on each sample. Once these tests were completed, we compared the results obtained between the different decellularization protocols and with samples left native. RESULTS: The difference in the means was similar between the tests performed on bones decellularized with the SDS protocol and native bones for pull-out test: +1.4% (CI95% [-10.5%– 12.4%]) of mean differences when comparing Native vs D1, compression -14.9% (CI95% [-42.7%– 12.5%]), 3-point bending -5.7% (CI95% [-22.5%– 11.1%]) and indentation -10.8% (CI95% [-19.5%– 4.6%]). Bones decellularized with the NaOH protocol showed different results from those obtained with the SDS protocol or native bones during the pull-out screw +40.7% (CI95% [24.3%– 57%]) for Native vs D2 protocol and 3-point bending tests +39.2% (CI95% [13.7%– 64.6%]) for Native vs D2 protocol. The other tests, compression and indentation, gave similar results for all our samples. CONCLUSION: Vascularized decellularized grafts seem to be an interesting means for bone reconstruction. Our study shows that the decellularization method affects the mechanical results of our specimens. Some methods seem to limit these alterations and could be used in the future for bone decellularization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9838862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98388622023-01-14 Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation Heller, Ugo Evrard, Robin Lengelé, Benoit Schubert, Thomas Kadlub, Natacha Boisson, Jean PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Large bone defects are challenging for surgeons. Available reimplanted bone substitutes can’t properly restore optimal function along and long term osteointegration of the bone graft. Bone substitute based on the perfusion-decellularization technique seem to be interesting in order to overcome these limitations. We present here an evaluation of the biomechanics of the bones thus obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two decellularization protocols were chosen for this study. One using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) (D1) and one using NaOH and H2O2 (D2). The decellularization was performed on porcine forearms. We then carried out compression, three-point bending, indentation and screw pull-out tests on each sample. Once these tests were completed, we compared the results obtained between the different decellularization protocols and with samples left native. RESULTS: The difference in the means was similar between the tests performed on bones decellularized with the SDS protocol and native bones for pull-out test: +1.4% (CI95% [-10.5%– 12.4%]) of mean differences when comparing Native vs D1, compression -14.9% (CI95% [-42.7%– 12.5%]), 3-point bending -5.7% (CI95% [-22.5%– 11.1%]) and indentation -10.8% (CI95% [-19.5%– 4.6%]). Bones decellularized with the NaOH protocol showed different results from those obtained with the SDS protocol or native bones during the pull-out screw +40.7% (CI95% [24.3%– 57%]) for Native vs D2 protocol and 3-point bending tests +39.2% (CI95% [13.7%– 64.6%]) for Native vs D2 protocol. The other tests, compression and indentation, gave similar results for all our samples. CONCLUSION: Vascularized decellularized grafts seem to be an interesting means for bone reconstruction. Our study shows that the decellularization method affects the mechanical results of our specimens. Some methods seem to limit these alterations and could be used in the future for bone decellularization. Public Library of Science 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9838862/ /pubmed/36638107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280193 Text en © 2023 Heller et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heller, Ugo Evrard, Robin Lengelé, Benoit Schubert, Thomas Kadlub, Natacha Boisson, Jean Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation |
title | Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation |
title_full | Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation |
title_fullStr | Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation |
title_short | Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation |
title_sort | decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: a mechanical evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36638107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellerugo decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation AT evrardrobin decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation AT lengelebenoit decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation AT schubertthomas decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation AT kadlubnatacha decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation AT boissonjean decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation |