Cargando…

Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Large bone defects are challenging for surgeons. Available reimplanted bone substitutes can’t properly restore optimal function along and long term osteointegration of the bone graft. Bone substitute based on the perfusion-decellularization technique seem to be interesting in order to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heller, Ugo, Evrard, Robin, Lengelé, Benoit, Schubert, Thomas, Kadlub, Natacha, Boisson, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36638107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280193
_version_ 1784869367795679232
author Heller, Ugo
Evrard, Robin
Lengelé, Benoit
Schubert, Thomas
Kadlub, Natacha
Boisson, Jean
author_facet Heller, Ugo
Evrard, Robin
Lengelé, Benoit
Schubert, Thomas
Kadlub, Natacha
Boisson, Jean
author_sort Heller, Ugo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Large bone defects are challenging for surgeons. Available reimplanted bone substitutes can’t properly restore optimal function along and long term osteointegration of the bone graft. Bone substitute based on the perfusion-decellularization technique seem to be interesting in order to overcome these limitations. We present here an evaluation of the biomechanics of the bones thus obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two decellularization protocols were chosen for this study. One using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) (D1) and one using NaOH and H2O2 (D2). The decellularization was performed on porcine forearms. We then carried out compression, three-point bending, indentation and screw pull-out tests on each sample. Once these tests were completed, we compared the results obtained between the different decellularization protocols and with samples left native. RESULTS: The difference in the means was similar between the tests performed on bones decellularized with the SDS protocol and native bones for pull-out test: +1.4% (CI95% [-10.5%– 12.4%]) of mean differences when comparing Native vs D1, compression -14.9% (CI95% [-42.7%– 12.5%]), 3-point bending -5.7% (CI95% [-22.5%– 11.1%]) and indentation -10.8% (CI95% [-19.5%– 4.6%]). Bones decellularized with the NaOH protocol showed different results from those obtained with the SDS protocol or native bones during the pull-out screw +40.7% (CI95% [24.3%– 57%]) for Native vs D2 protocol and 3-point bending tests +39.2% (CI95% [13.7%– 64.6%]) for Native vs D2 protocol. The other tests, compression and indentation, gave similar results for all our samples. CONCLUSION: Vascularized decellularized grafts seem to be an interesting means for bone reconstruction. Our study shows that the decellularization method affects the mechanical results of our specimens. Some methods seem to limit these alterations and could be used in the future for bone decellularization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9838862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98388622023-01-14 Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation Heller, Ugo Evrard, Robin Lengelé, Benoit Schubert, Thomas Kadlub, Natacha Boisson, Jean PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Large bone defects are challenging for surgeons. Available reimplanted bone substitutes can’t properly restore optimal function along and long term osteointegration of the bone graft. Bone substitute based on the perfusion-decellularization technique seem to be interesting in order to overcome these limitations. We present here an evaluation of the biomechanics of the bones thus obtained. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two decellularization protocols were chosen for this study. One using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) (D1) and one using NaOH and H2O2 (D2). The decellularization was performed on porcine forearms. We then carried out compression, three-point bending, indentation and screw pull-out tests on each sample. Once these tests were completed, we compared the results obtained between the different decellularization protocols and with samples left native. RESULTS: The difference in the means was similar between the tests performed on bones decellularized with the SDS protocol and native bones for pull-out test: +1.4% (CI95% [-10.5%– 12.4%]) of mean differences when comparing Native vs D1, compression -14.9% (CI95% [-42.7%– 12.5%]), 3-point bending -5.7% (CI95% [-22.5%– 11.1%]) and indentation -10.8% (CI95% [-19.5%– 4.6%]). Bones decellularized with the NaOH protocol showed different results from those obtained with the SDS protocol or native bones during the pull-out screw +40.7% (CI95% [24.3%– 57%]) for Native vs D2 protocol and 3-point bending tests +39.2% (CI95% [13.7%– 64.6%]) for Native vs D2 protocol. The other tests, compression and indentation, gave similar results for all our samples. CONCLUSION: Vascularized decellularized grafts seem to be an interesting means for bone reconstruction. Our study shows that the decellularization method affects the mechanical results of our specimens. Some methods seem to limit these alterations and could be used in the future for bone decellularization. Public Library of Science 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9838862/ /pubmed/36638107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280193 Text en © 2023 Heller et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heller, Ugo
Evrard, Robin
Lengelé, Benoit
Schubert, Thomas
Kadlub, Natacha
Boisson, Jean
Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
title Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
title_full Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
title_fullStr Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
title_short Decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: A mechanical evaluation
title_sort decellularized vascularized bone grafts as therapeutic solution for bone reconstruction: a mechanical evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36638107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280193
work_keys_str_mv AT hellerugo decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation
AT evrardrobin decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation
AT lengelebenoit decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation
AT schubertthomas decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation
AT kadlubnatacha decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation
AT boissonjean decellularizedvascularizedbonegraftsastherapeuticsolutionforbonereconstructionamechanicalevaluation