Non-surgical treatment of giant tumor-like lumbar disc herniation based on enhanced MRI: A case series

In recent clinical follow-up, it has been vertified that resorption in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) could be of great curative effect in non-surgical treatment for LDH. However, reports of resorption in giant tumor-like LDH are rarely mentioned due to its risk of irreversible neurological damage which could be caused by long-term non-surgical treatment. In our clinical observations, we have found that enhanced MRI helps to distinguish LDH from intradural tumours and to predict the probability of resorption in LDH. We analyzed 8 patients with giant tumor-like LDH who underwent non-surgical treatment, and these patients had resorption during follow-up. All patients were examined with enhanced MRI before treatment, and the type of “bull’s eye” sign classification was determined by images. The MRI protrusion volume(VP), resorption rate(HR%) and JOA score of patients at the first visit and the last follow-up were recorded. PATIENT CONCERNS: 8 patients of Han ethnicity were admitted to the department of orthopedic complaining of low back pain for 1week to 12months. They were diagnosed with giant tumor-like LDH by enhanced MRI. DIAGNOSES: These patients were diagnosed with giant tumor-like LDH. INTERVENTIONS: We adopted a non-surgical treatment plan for the patients, including taking oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and performing rehabilitation exercise. In consideration of the risk of irreversible neurological damage, patients were closely observed during treatment and follow-up. Once the following conditions occur, surgical treatment is required immediately: The symptoms are not signifcantly relieved after 3 to 6 months of non-surgical treatment; The symptoms are aggravated by non-surgica treatment; The clinical manifestations of cauda equina syndrome. OUTCOMES: After treated with oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and rehabilitation exercise, the resorption was accompanied by clinical symptom relief. No neurological damage occurred in all patients, and the clinical symptoms did not recur in the subsequent follow-up. LESSONS: Clinicians should fully consider the possibility of resorption prior to surgical treatment in patients with giant LDH. We can predict the probability of resorption in patients with giant LDH based on enhanced MRI. For patients with a high probability of resorption, we can choose non-surgical treatment in the absence of progressive neurological impairment and cauda equina syndrome.