Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs

The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify people who are infected. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (mean = 27 tests per 100,000 people per day). We simulated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Alvin X., Toporowski, Amy, Sacks, Jilian A., Perkins, Mark D., Briand, Sylvie, van Kerkhove, Maria, Hannay, Emma, Carmona, Sergio, Rodriguez, Bill, Parker, Edyth, Nichols, Brooke E., Russell, Colin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01267-w
_version_ 1784869485841219584
author Han, Alvin X.
Toporowski, Amy
Sacks, Jilian A.
Perkins, Mark D.
Briand, Sylvie
van Kerkhove, Maria
Hannay, Emma
Carmona, Sergio
Rodriguez, Bill
Parker, Edyth
Nichols, Brooke E.
Russell, Colin A.
author_facet Han, Alvin X.
Toporowski, Amy
Sacks, Jilian A.
Perkins, Mark D.
Briand, Sylvie
van Kerkhove, Maria
Hannay, Emma
Carmona, Sergio
Rodriguez, Bill
Parker, Edyth
Nichols, Brooke E.
Russell, Colin A.
author_sort Han, Alvin X.
collection PubMed
description The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify people who are infected. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (mean = 27 tests per 100,000 people per day). We simulated COVID-19 epidemics in a prototypical low- and middle-income country to investigate how testing rates, sampling strategies and sequencing proportions jointly impact surveillance outcomes, and showed that low testing rates and spatiotemporal biases delay time to detection of new variants by weeks to months and can lead to unreliable estimates of variant prevalence, even when the proportion of samples sequenced is increased. Accordingly, investments in wider access to diagnostics to support testing rates of approximately 100 tests per 100,000 people per day could enable more timely detection of new variants and reliable estimates of variant prevalence. The performance of global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance programs is fundamentally limited by access to diagnostic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9839449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98394492023-01-15 SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs Han, Alvin X. Toporowski, Amy Sacks, Jilian A. Perkins, Mark D. Briand, Sylvie van Kerkhove, Maria Hannay, Emma Carmona, Sergio Rodriguez, Bill Parker, Edyth Nichols, Brooke E. Russell, Colin A. Nat Genet Article The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify people who are infected. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (mean = 27 tests per 100,000 people per day). We simulated COVID-19 epidemics in a prototypical low- and middle-income country to investigate how testing rates, sampling strategies and sequencing proportions jointly impact surveillance outcomes, and showed that low testing rates and spatiotemporal biases delay time to detection of new variants by weeks to months and can lead to unreliable estimates of variant prevalence, even when the proportion of samples sequenced is increased. Accordingly, investments in wider access to diagnostics to support testing rates of approximately 100 tests per 100,000 people per day could enable more timely detection of new variants and reliable estimates of variant prevalence. The performance of global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance programs is fundamentally limited by access to diagnostic testing. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-01-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9839449/ /pubmed/36624344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01267-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Han, Alvin X.
Toporowski, Amy
Sacks, Jilian A.
Perkins, Mark D.
Briand, Sylvie
van Kerkhove, Maria
Hannay, Emma
Carmona, Sergio
Rodriguez, Bill
Parker, Edyth
Nichols, Brooke E.
Russell, Colin A.
SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_full SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_short SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_sort sars-cov-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36624344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01267-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hanalvinx sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT toporowskiamy sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT sacksjiliana sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT perkinsmarkd sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT briandsylvie sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT vankerkhovemaria sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT hannayemma sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT carmonasergio sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT rodriguezbill sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT parkeredyth sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT nicholsbrookee sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT russellcolina sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms