Cargando…
Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not y...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9 |
_version_ | 1784869520462053376 |
---|---|
author | Sasse, Mareen Ohrndorf, Sarah Palmowski, Andriko Wagner, Annette D. Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger Pankow, Anne Krusche, Martin |
author_facet | Sasse, Mareen Ohrndorf, Sarah Palmowski, Andriko Wagner, Annette D. Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger Pankow, Anne Krusche, Martin |
author_sort | Sasse, Mareen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not yet been evaluated. A YouTube search was conducted to assess videos about AID to evaluate the quality and usefulness from both the patient’s and healthcare professional´s perspectives. Video duration, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and uploading source on various AID were extracted. Video quality was evaluated by the modified global quality scale (GQS). The reliability was assessed by the modified five-point DISCERN score. In total, 140 videos were screened of which 105 videos met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Based on the GQS, the overall quality of videos for patients was found to be low in 64.8%, intermediate in 27.6%, and high in 7.6% of videos. The quality of videos for professionals was similar (54.3% low, 23.8% intermediate, and 21.9% of high quality). Videos were more often targeting medical professionals (65.7%) and less often patients (34.3%). This analysis demonstrates that the majority of videos regarding AIDs are of limited quality. Available videos more often address users with a professional medical background. Only a small proportion of existing videos provide understandable and useful information for AID patients. Thus, there is a strong need to develop high-quality and audience-oriented videos in the context of educational campaigns for these rare disease groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9839787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98397872023-01-15 Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis Sasse, Mareen Ohrndorf, Sarah Palmowski, Andriko Wagner, Annette D. Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger Pankow, Anne Krusche, Martin Rheumatol Int Observational Research Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not yet been evaluated. A YouTube search was conducted to assess videos about AID to evaluate the quality and usefulness from both the patient’s and healthcare professional´s perspectives. Video duration, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and uploading source on various AID were extracted. Video quality was evaluated by the modified global quality scale (GQS). The reliability was assessed by the modified five-point DISCERN score. In total, 140 videos were screened of which 105 videos met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Based on the GQS, the overall quality of videos for patients was found to be low in 64.8%, intermediate in 27.6%, and high in 7.6% of videos. The quality of videos for professionals was similar (54.3% low, 23.8% intermediate, and 21.9% of high quality). Videos were more often targeting medical professionals (65.7%) and less often patients (34.3%). This analysis demonstrates that the majority of videos regarding AIDs are of limited quality. Available videos more often address users with a professional medical background. Only a small proportion of existing videos provide understandable and useful information for AID patients. Thus, there is a strong need to develop high-quality and audience-oriented videos in the context of educational campaigns for these rare disease groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9839787/ /pubmed/36374326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Observational Research Sasse, Mareen Ohrndorf, Sarah Palmowski, Andriko Wagner, Annette D. Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger Pankow, Anne Krusche, Martin Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis |
title | Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis |
title_full | Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis |
title_fullStr | Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis |
title_short | Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis |
title_sort | digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a youtube quality analysis |
topic | Observational Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sassemareen digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis AT ohrndorfsarah digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis AT palmowskiandriko digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis AT wagnerannetted digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis AT burmestergerdrudiger digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis AT pankowanne digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis AT kruschemartin digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis |