Cargando…

Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis

Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasse, Mareen, Ohrndorf, Sarah, Palmowski, Andriko, Wagner, Annette D., Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger, Pankow, Anne, Krusche, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9
_version_ 1784869520462053376
author Sasse, Mareen
Ohrndorf, Sarah
Palmowski, Andriko
Wagner, Annette D.
Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger
Pankow, Anne
Krusche, Martin
author_facet Sasse, Mareen
Ohrndorf, Sarah
Palmowski, Andriko
Wagner, Annette D.
Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger
Pankow, Anne
Krusche, Martin
author_sort Sasse, Mareen
collection PubMed
description Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not yet been evaluated. A YouTube search was conducted to assess videos about AID to evaluate the quality and usefulness from both the patient’s and healthcare professional´s perspectives. Video duration, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and uploading source on various AID were extracted. Video quality was evaluated by the modified global quality scale (GQS). The reliability was assessed by the modified five-point DISCERN score. In total, 140 videos were screened of which 105 videos met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Based on the GQS, the overall quality of videos for patients was found to be low in 64.8%, intermediate in 27.6%, and high in 7.6% of videos. The quality of videos for professionals was similar (54.3% low, 23.8% intermediate, and 21.9% of high quality). Videos were more often targeting medical professionals (65.7%) and less often patients (34.3%). This analysis demonstrates that the majority of videos regarding AIDs are of limited quality. Available videos more often address users with a professional medical background. Only a small proportion of existing videos provide understandable and useful information for AID patients. Thus, there is a strong need to develop high-quality and audience-oriented videos in the context of educational campaigns for these rare disease groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9839787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98397872023-01-15 Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis Sasse, Mareen Ohrndorf, Sarah Palmowski, Andriko Wagner, Annette D. Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger Pankow, Anne Krusche, Martin Rheumatol Int Observational Research Getting access to specialists for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) can be challenging. Therefore, an increasing number of patients and healthcare professionals are seeking information on AID via the Internet, using the video platform YouTube, for example. However, the quality of such videos has not yet been evaluated. A YouTube search was conducted to assess videos about AID to evaluate the quality and usefulness from both the patient’s and healthcare professional´s perspectives. Video duration, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and uploading source on various AID were extracted. Video quality was evaluated by the modified global quality scale (GQS). The reliability was assessed by the modified five-point DISCERN score. In total, 140 videos were screened of which 105 videos met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. Based on the GQS, the overall quality of videos for patients was found to be low in 64.8%, intermediate in 27.6%, and high in 7.6% of videos. The quality of videos for professionals was similar (54.3% low, 23.8% intermediate, and 21.9% of high quality). Videos were more often targeting medical professionals (65.7%) and less often patients (34.3%). This analysis demonstrates that the majority of videos regarding AIDs are of limited quality. Available videos more often address users with a professional medical background. Only a small proportion of existing videos provide understandable and useful information for AID patients. Thus, there is a strong need to develop high-quality and audience-oriented videos in the context of educational campaigns for these rare disease groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9839787/ /pubmed/36374326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Observational Research
Sasse, Mareen
Ohrndorf, Sarah
Palmowski, Andriko
Wagner, Annette D.
Burmester, Gerd Rüdiger
Pankow, Anne
Krusche, Martin
Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
title Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
title_full Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
title_fullStr Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
title_full_unstemmed Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
title_short Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis
title_sort digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a youtube quality analysis
topic Observational Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05243-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sassemareen digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis
AT ohrndorfsarah digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis
AT palmowskiandriko digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis
AT wagnerannetted digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis
AT burmestergerdrudiger digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis
AT pankowanne digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis
AT kruschemartin digitalhealthinformationonautoinflammatorydiseasesayoutubequalityanalysis