Cargando…
Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has seen an increase in application, and is an important element of a digital evolution. The role of ML within upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies has not been evaluated properly in the literature. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide a comp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09516-z |
_version_ | 1784869527861854208 |
---|---|
author | Bektaş, Mustafa Burchell, George L. Bonjer, H. Jaap van der Peet, Donald L. |
author_facet | Bektaş, Mustafa Burchell, George L. Bonjer, H. Jaap van der Peet, Donald L. |
author_sort | Bektaş, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has seen an increase in application, and is an important element of a digital evolution. The role of ML within upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies has not been evaluated properly in the literature. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ML applications within upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Studies were only included when they described machine learning in upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to determine the methodological quality of studies. The accuracy and area under the curve were evaluated, representing the predictive performances of ML models. RESULTS: From a total of 1821 articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies received a moderate risk-of-bias score. The majority of these studies focused on neural networks (n = 9), multiple machine learning (n = 8), and random forests (n = 3). Remaining studies involved radiomics (n = 3), support vector machines (n = 3), and decision trees (n = 1). Purposes of ML included predominantly prediction of metastasis, detection of risk factors, prediction of survival, and prediction of postoperative complications. Other purposes were predictions of TNM staging, chemotherapy response, tumor resectability, and optimal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Machine Learning algorithms seem to contribute to the prediction of postoperative complications and the course of disease after upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. However, due to the retrospective character of ML studies, these results require trials or prospective studies to validate this application of ML. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09516-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9839827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98398272023-01-15 Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review Bektaş, Mustafa Burchell, George L. Bonjer, H. Jaap van der Peet, Donald L. Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has seen an increase in application, and is an important element of a digital evolution. The role of ML within upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies has not been evaluated properly in the literature. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ML applications within upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Studies were only included when they described machine learning in upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to determine the methodological quality of studies. The accuracy and area under the curve were evaluated, representing the predictive performances of ML models. RESULTS: From a total of 1821 articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies received a moderate risk-of-bias score. The majority of these studies focused on neural networks (n = 9), multiple machine learning (n = 8), and random forests (n = 3). Remaining studies involved radiomics (n = 3), support vector machines (n = 3), and decision trees (n = 1). Purposes of ML included predominantly prediction of metastasis, detection of risk factors, prediction of survival, and prediction of postoperative complications. Other purposes were predictions of TNM staging, chemotherapy response, tumor resectability, and optimal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Machine Learning algorithms seem to contribute to the prediction of postoperative complications and the course of disease after upper gastrointestinal surgery for malignancies. However, due to the retrospective character of ML studies, these results require trials or prospective studies to validate this application of ML. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09516-z. Springer US 2022-08-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9839827/ /pubmed/35953684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09516-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bektaş, Mustafa Burchell, George L. Bonjer, H. Jaap van der Peet, Donald L. Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
title | Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
title_full | Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
title_short | Machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
title_sort | machine learning applications in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9839827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09516-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bektasmustafa machinelearningapplicationsinuppergastrointestinalcancersurgeryasystematicreview AT burchellgeorgel machinelearningapplicationsinuppergastrointestinalcancersurgeryasystematicreview AT bonjerhjaap machinelearningapplicationsinuppergastrointestinalcancersurgeryasystematicreview AT vanderpeetdonaldl machinelearningapplicationsinuppergastrointestinalcancersurgeryasystematicreview |