Boring biopsy with rapid on‐site evaluation for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A pilot study

One of 4 patients (25%) and 2 of 3 patients (67%) were correctly diagnosed by conventional and hot boring biopsies, respectively. The median procedure time of conventional and hot boring biopsies was 21 (range, 13–33) and 17 (range, 16–23) min, respectively. Rapid on‐site evaluation was performed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanesaka, Takashi, Inoue, Takahiro, Tajiri, Ayaka, Fukuda, Hiromu, Waki, Kotaro, Shichijo, Satoki, Maekawa, Akira, Yamamoto, Sachiko, Takeuchi, Yoji, Higashino, Koji, Uedo, Noriya, Michida, Tomoki, Tanada, Satoshi, Honma, Keiichiro, Ishihara, Ryu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022
Materias:
Brief Report
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36660046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12854
Descripción
Sumario:One of 4 patients (25%) and 2 of 3 patients (67%) were correctly diagnosed by conventional and hot boring biopsies, respectively. The median procedure time of conventional and hot boring biopsies was 21 (range, 13–33) and 17 (range, 16–23) min, respectively. Rapid on‐site evaluation was performed totally 12 times in 7 patients. The positive and negative predictive values of rapid on‐site evaluation for gastrointestinal stromal tumor were 0.5 (0.12–0.88) and 1.0 (0.42–1.00), respectively.[Image: see text]

Ejemplares similares