Cargando…

Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth

BACKGROUND: Altered DNA-methylation affects biological ageing in adults and developmental processes in children. DNA-methylation is altered by environmental factors, trauma and illnesses. We hypothesised that paediatric critical illness, and the nutritional management in the paediatric intensive car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verlinden, Ines, Coppens, Grégoire, Vanhorebeek, Ilse, Güiza, Fabian, Derese, Inge, Wouters, Pieter J., Joosten, Koen F., Verbruggen, Sascha C., Van den Berghe, Greet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01424-w
_version_ 1784869605385175040
author Verlinden, Ines
Coppens, Grégoire
Vanhorebeek, Ilse
Güiza, Fabian
Derese, Inge
Wouters, Pieter J.
Joosten, Koen F.
Verbruggen, Sascha C.
Van den Berghe, Greet
author_facet Verlinden, Ines
Coppens, Grégoire
Vanhorebeek, Ilse
Güiza, Fabian
Derese, Inge
Wouters, Pieter J.
Joosten, Koen F.
Verbruggen, Sascha C.
Van den Berghe, Greet
author_sort Verlinden, Ines
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Altered DNA-methylation affects biological ageing in adults and developmental processes in children. DNA-methylation is altered by environmental factors, trauma and illnesses. We hypothesised that paediatric critical illness, and the nutritional management in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), affects DNA-methylation changes that underly the developmental processes of childhood ageing. RESULTS: We studied the impact of critical illness, and of the early use of parenteral nutrition (early-PN) versus late-PN, on “epigenetic age-deviation” in buccal mucosa of 818 former PICU-patients (406 early-PN, 412 late-PN) who participated in the 2-year follow-up of the multicentre PEPaNIC-RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT01536275), as compared with 392 matched healthy children, and assessed whether this relates to their impaired growth. The epigenetic age-deviation (difference between PedBE clock-estimated epigenetic age and chronological age) was calculated. Using bootstrapped multivariable linear regression models, we assessed the impact hereon of critical illness, and of early-PN versus late-PN. As compared with healthy children, epigenetic age of patients assessed 2 years after PICU-admission deviated negatively from chronological age (p < 0.05 in 51% of bootstrapped replicates), similarly in early-PN and late-PN groups. Next, we identified vulnerable subgroups for epigenetic age-deviation using interaction analysis. We revealed that DNA-methylation age-deceleration in former PICU-patients was dependent on age at time of illness (p < 0.05 for 83% of bootstrapped replicates), with vulnerability starting from 6 years onwards. Finally, we assessed whether vulnerability to epigenetic age-deviation could be related to impaired growth from PICU-admission to follow-up at 2 and 4 years. Multivariable repeated measures ANOVA showed that former PICU-patients, as compared with healthy children, grew less in height (p = 0.0002) and transiently gained weight (p = 0.0003) over the 4-year time course. Growth in height was more stunted in former PICU-patients aged ≥ 6-years at time of critical illness (p = 0.002) than in the younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with healthy children, former PICU-patients, in particular those aged ≥ 6-years at time of illness, revealed epigenetic age-deceleration, with a physical correlate revealing stunted growth in height. Whether this vulnerability around the age of 6 years for epigenetic age-deceleration and stunted growth years later relates to altered endocrine pathways activated at the time of adrenarche requires further investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-023-01424-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9840263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98402632023-01-15 Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth Verlinden, Ines Coppens, Grégoire Vanhorebeek, Ilse Güiza, Fabian Derese, Inge Wouters, Pieter J. Joosten, Koen F. Verbruggen, Sascha C. Van den Berghe, Greet Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Altered DNA-methylation affects biological ageing in adults and developmental processes in children. DNA-methylation is altered by environmental factors, trauma and illnesses. We hypothesised that paediatric critical illness, and the nutritional management in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), affects DNA-methylation changes that underly the developmental processes of childhood ageing. RESULTS: We studied the impact of critical illness, and of the early use of parenteral nutrition (early-PN) versus late-PN, on “epigenetic age-deviation” in buccal mucosa of 818 former PICU-patients (406 early-PN, 412 late-PN) who participated in the 2-year follow-up of the multicentre PEPaNIC-RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT01536275), as compared with 392 matched healthy children, and assessed whether this relates to their impaired growth. The epigenetic age-deviation (difference between PedBE clock-estimated epigenetic age and chronological age) was calculated. Using bootstrapped multivariable linear regression models, we assessed the impact hereon of critical illness, and of early-PN versus late-PN. As compared with healthy children, epigenetic age of patients assessed 2 years after PICU-admission deviated negatively from chronological age (p < 0.05 in 51% of bootstrapped replicates), similarly in early-PN and late-PN groups. Next, we identified vulnerable subgroups for epigenetic age-deviation using interaction analysis. We revealed that DNA-methylation age-deceleration in former PICU-patients was dependent on age at time of illness (p < 0.05 for 83% of bootstrapped replicates), with vulnerability starting from 6 years onwards. Finally, we assessed whether vulnerability to epigenetic age-deviation could be related to impaired growth from PICU-admission to follow-up at 2 and 4 years. Multivariable repeated measures ANOVA showed that former PICU-patients, as compared with healthy children, grew less in height (p = 0.0002) and transiently gained weight (p = 0.0003) over the 4-year time course. Growth in height was more stunted in former PICU-patients aged ≥ 6-years at time of critical illness (p = 0.002) than in the younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with healthy children, former PICU-patients, in particular those aged ≥ 6-years at time of illness, revealed epigenetic age-deceleration, with a physical correlate revealing stunted growth in height. Whether this vulnerability around the age of 6 years for epigenetic age-deceleration and stunted growth years later relates to altered endocrine pathways activated at the time of adrenarche requires further investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-023-01424-w. BioMed Central 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9840263/ /pubmed/36639798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01424-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Verlinden, Ines
Coppens, Grégoire
Vanhorebeek, Ilse
Güiza, Fabian
Derese, Inge
Wouters, Pieter J.
Joosten, Koen F.
Verbruggen, Sascha C.
Van den Berghe, Greet
Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
title Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
title_full Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
title_fullStr Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
title_full_unstemmed Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
title_short Long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
title_sort long-term impact of paediatric critical illness on the difference between epigenetic and chronological age in relation to physical growth
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01424-w
work_keys_str_mv AT verlindenines longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT coppensgregoire longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT vanhorebeekilse longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT guizafabian longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT dereseinge longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT wouterspieterj longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT joostenkoenf longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT verbruggensaschac longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth
AT vandenberghegreet longtermimpactofpaediatriccriticalillnessonthedifferencebetweenepigeneticandchronologicalageinrelationtophysicalgrowth