Cargando…
Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36641467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y |
_version_ | 1784869618133762048 |
---|---|
author | Sørensen, Natasha Lee Bemman, Brian Jensen, Martin Bach Moeslund, Thomas B. Thomsen, Janus Laust |
author_facet | Sørensen, Natasha Lee Bemman, Brian Jensen, Martin Bach Moeslund, Thomas B. Thomsen, Janus Laust |
author_sort | Sørensen, Natasha Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize the research that has been carried out in methods of machine learning applied to the support and automation of administrative tasks in general practice. METHODS: Databases covering the fields of health care and engineering sciences (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL with full text, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) were searched. Screening for eligible studies was completed using Covidence, and data was extracted along nine research-based attributes concerning general practice, administrative tasks, and machine learning. The search and screening processes were completed during the period of April to June 2022. RESULTS: 1439 records were identified and 1158 were screened for eligibility criteria. A total of 12 studies were included. The extracted attributes indicate that most studies concern various scheduling tasks using supervised machine learning methods with relatively low general practitioner (GP) involvement. Importantly, four studies employed the latest available machine learning methods and the data used frequently varied in terms of setting, type, and availability. CONCLUSION: The limited field of research developing in the application of machine learning to administrative tasks in general practice indicates that there is a great need and high potential for such methods. However, there is currently a lack of research likely due to the unavailability of open-source data and a prioritization of diagnostic-based tasks. Future research would benefit from open-source data, cutting-edge methods of machine learning, and clearly stated GP involvement, so that improved and replicable scientific research can be done. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9840326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98403262023-01-15 Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation Sørensen, Natasha Lee Bemman, Brian Jensen, Martin Bach Moeslund, Thomas B. Thomsen, Janus Laust BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize the research that has been carried out in methods of machine learning applied to the support and automation of administrative tasks in general practice. METHODS: Databases covering the fields of health care and engineering sciences (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL with full text, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) were searched. Screening for eligible studies was completed using Covidence, and data was extracted along nine research-based attributes concerning general practice, administrative tasks, and machine learning. The search and screening processes were completed during the period of April to June 2022. RESULTS: 1439 records were identified and 1158 were screened for eligibility criteria. A total of 12 studies were included. The extracted attributes indicate that most studies concern various scheduling tasks using supervised machine learning methods with relatively low general practitioner (GP) involvement. Importantly, four studies employed the latest available machine learning methods and the data used frequently varied in terms of setting, type, and availability. CONCLUSION: The limited field of research developing in the application of machine learning to administrative tasks in general practice indicates that there is a great need and high potential for such methods. However, there is currently a lack of research likely due to the unavailability of open-source data and a prioritization of diagnostic-based tasks. Future research would benefit from open-source data, cutting-edge methods of machine learning, and clearly stated GP involvement, so that improved and replicable scientific research can be done. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y. BioMed Central 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9840326/ /pubmed/36641467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sørensen, Natasha Lee Bemman, Brian Jensen, Martin Bach Moeslund, Thomas B. Thomsen, Janus Laust Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
title | Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
title_full | Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
title_fullStr | Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
title_short | Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
title_sort | machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36641467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sørensennatashalee machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation AT bemmanbrian machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation AT jensenmartinbach machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation AT moeslundthomasb machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation AT thomsenjanuslaust machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation |