Cargando…

Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sørensen, Natasha Lee, Bemman, Brian, Jensen, Martin Bach, Moeslund, Thomas B., Thomsen, Janus Laust
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36641467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y
_version_ 1784869618133762048
author Sørensen, Natasha Lee
Bemman, Brian
Jensen, Martin Bach
Moeslund, Thomas B.
Thomsen, Janus Laust
author_facet Sørensen, Natasha Lee
Bemman, Brian
Jensen, Martin Bach
Moeslund, Thomas B.
Thomsen, Janus Laust
author_sort Sørensen, Natasha Lee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize the research that has been carried out in methods of machine learning applied to the support and automation of administrative tasks in general practice. METHODS: Databases covering the fields of health care and engineering sciences (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL with full text, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) were searched. Screening for eligible studies was completed using Covidence, and data was extracted along nine research-based attributes concerning general practice, administrative tasks, and machine learning. The search and screening processes were completed during the period of April to June 2022. RESULTS: 1439 records were identified and 1158 were screened for eligibility criteria. A total of 12 studies were included. The extracted attributes indicate that most studies concern various scheduling tasks using supervised machine learning methods with relatively low general practitioner (GP) involvement. Importantly, four studies employed the latest available machine learning methods and the data used frequently varied in terms of setting, type, and availability. CONCLUSION: The limited field of research developing in the application of machine learning to administrative tasks in general practice indicates that there is a great need and high potential for such methods. However, there is currently a lack of research likely due to the unavailability of open-source data and a prioritization of diagnostic-based tasks. Future research would benefit from open-source data, cutting-edge methods of machine learning, and clearly stated GP involvement, so that improved and replicable scientific research can be done. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9840326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98403262023-01-15 Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation Sørensen, Natasha Lee Bemman, Brian Jensen, Martin Bach Moeslund, Thomas B. Thomsen, Janus Laust BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support general practice in the early detection of disease and treatment recommendations. However, AI systems aimed at alleviating time-consuming administrative tasks currently appear limited. This scoping review thus aims to summarize the research that has been carried out in methods of machine learning applied to the support and automation of administrative tasks in general practice. METHODS: Databases covering the fields of health care and engineering sciences (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL with full text, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore) were searched. Screening for eligible studies was completed using Covidence, and data was extracted along nine research-based attributes concerning general practice, administrative tasks, and machine learning. The search and screening processes were completed during the period of April to June 2022. RESULTS: 1439 records were identified and 1158 were screened for eligibility criteria. A total of 12 studies were included. The extracted attributes indicate that most studies concern various scheduling tasks using supervised machine learning methods with relatively low general practitioner (GP) involvement. Importantly, four studies employed the latest available machine learning methods and the data used frequently varied in terms of setting, type, and availability. CONCLUSION: The limited field of research developing in the application of machine learning to administrative tasks in general practice indicates that there is a great need and high potential for such methods. However, there is currently a lack of research likely due to the unavailability of open-source data and a prioritization of diagnostic-based tasks. Future research would benefit from open-source data, cutting-edge methods of machine learning, and clearly stated GP involvement, so that improved and replicable scientific research can be done. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y. BioMed Central 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9840326/ /pubmed/36641467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sørensen, Natasha Lee
Bemman, Brian
Jensen, Martin Bach
Moeslund, Thomas B.
Thomsen, Janus Laust
Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
title Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
title_full Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
title_fullStr Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
title_short Machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
title_sort machine learning in general practice: scoping review of administrative task support and automation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36641467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01969-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sørensennatashalee machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation
AT bemmanbrian machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation
AT jensenmartinbach machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation
AT moeslundthomasb machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation
AT thomsenjanuslaust machinelearningingeneralpracticescopingreviewofadministrativetasksupportandautomation