Cargando…

Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants

PURPOSE: Awake spinal anesthesia continues as an alternative to general anesthesia for infants. Standard clinical practice includes the manual palpation of surface landmarks to identify the desired intervertebral space for lumbar puncture (LP). The current study investigates the accuracy of manual p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Joanne, Roth, Catherine, Dontukurthy, Sujana, Tobias, Joseph D, Veneziano, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647435
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S392438
_version_ 1784869635373400064
author Du, Joanne
Roth, Catherine
Dontukurthy, Sujana
Tobias, Joseph D
Veneziano, Giorgio
author_facet Du, Joanne
Roth, Catherine
Dontukurthy, Sujana
Tobias, Joseph D
Veneziano, Giorgio
author_sort Du, Joanne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Awake spinal anesthesia continues as an alternative to general anesthesia for infants. Standard clinical practice includes the manual palpation of surface landmarks to identify the desired intervertebral space for lumbar puncture (LP). The current study investigates the accuracy of manual palpation for identifying the intended intervertebral site for LP, using ultrasonography for confirmation and to determine the interspace where the conus medullaris ends. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After informed parental consent, patients less than one year of age undergoing spinal anesthesia for lower abdominal, urologic, or lower extremity surgical procedures were included. Patients were held in the seated position and an attending pediatric anesthesiologist or pediatric anesthesiology fellow declared the vertebral interspace intended for needle insertion, palpated surface landmarks, and placed a mark at the site. A research anesthesiologist then determined the actual vertebral interspace of the marked site and the location of the conus medullaris using ultrasonography. The time to complete both techniques (manual palpation and ultrasonography) was recorded. RESULTS: The study cohort included 50 infants (median age of 7 months). Sixteen vertebral interspaces (32%) were inaccurately marked. One was marked two spaces higher than intended, ten were marked one space higher than intended, and five were marked one space lower than intended. In one patient, the intended vertebral interspace for the lumbar puncture overlaid the conus medullaris. The median time required was 25 seconds (IQR 14.3, 32) for palpation and 39 seconds (IQR 29, 63.8) for ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Manual palpation of surface landmarks to determine the correct interspace for LP for spinal anesthesia in infants is inaccurate. The time required to perform spinal ultrasonography in infants for determination of the optimal site for LP is brief and may be useful in ensuring accurate identification of the correct interspace and the location of the conus medullaris.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9840403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98404032023-01-15 Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants Du, Joanne Roth, Catherine Dontukurthy, Sujana Tobias, Joseph D Veneziano, Giorgio J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Awake spinal anesthesia continues as an alternative to general anesthesia for infants. Standard clinical practice includes the manual palpation of surface landmarks to identify the desired intervertebral space for lumbar puncture (LP). The current study investigates the accuracy of manual palpation for identifying the intended intervertebral site for LP, using ultrasonography for confirmation and to determine the interspace where the conus medullaris ends. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After informed parental consent, patients less than one year of age undergoing spinal anesthesia for lower abdominal, urologic, or lower extremity surgical procedures were included. Patients were held in the seated position and an attending pediatric anesthesiologist or pediatric anesthesiology fellow declared the vertebral interspace intended for needle insertion, palpated surface landmarks, and placed a mark at the site. A research anesthesiologist then determined the actual vertebral interspace of the marked site and the location of the conus medullaris using ultrasonography. The time to complete both techniques (manual palpation and ultrasonography) was recorded. RESULTS: The study cohort included 50 infants (median age of 7 months). Sixteen vertebral interspaces (32%) were inaccurately marked. One was marked two spaces higher than intended, ten were marked one space higher than intended, and five were marked one space lower than intended. In one patient, the intended vertebral interspace for the lumbar puncture overlaid the conus medullaris. The median time required was 25 seconds (IQR 14.3, 32) for palpation and 39 seconds (IQR 29, 63.8) for ultrasonography. CONCLUSION: Manual palpation of surface landmarks to determine the correct interspace for LP for spinal anesthesia in infants is inaccurate. The time required to perform spinal ultrasonography in infants for determination of the optimal site for LP is brief and may be useful in ensuring accurate identification of the correct interspace and the location of the conus medullaris. Dove 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9840403/ /pubmed/36647435 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S392438 Text en © 2023 Du et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Du, Joanne
Roth, Catherine
Dontukurthy, Sujana
Tobias, Joseph D
Veneziano, Giorgio
Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants
title Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants
title_full Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants
title_fullStr Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants
title_full_unstemmed Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants
title_short Manual Palpation versus Ultrasound to Identify the Intervertebral Space for Spinal Anesthesia in Infants
title_sort manual palpation versus ultrasound to identify the intervertebral space for spinal anesthesia in infants
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647435
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S392438
work_keys_str_mv AT dujoanne manualpalpationversusultrasoundtoidentifytheintervertebralspaceforspinalanesthesiaininfants
AT rothcatherine manualpalpationversusultrasoundtoidentifytheintervertebralspaceforspinalanesthesiaininfants
AT dontukurthysujana manualpalpationversusultrasoundtoidentifytheintervertebralspaceforspinalanesthesiaininfants
AT tobiasjosephd manualpalpationversusultrasoundtoidentifytheintervertebralspaceforspinalanesthesiaininfants
AT venezianogiorgio manualpalpationversusultrasoundtoidentifytheintervertebralspaceforspinalanesthesiaininfants