Cargando…

Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy

OBJECTIVE: Ischemia reperfusion injury greatly damages liver function and deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. This study is to compare the protective efficiency of direct and remote ischemic preconditioning (DIPC and RIPC) on ischemia reperfusion injury of the live...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Erliang, Yuan, Chang, Li, Yongchang, Tian, Tian, He, Yan, Feng, Xudong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2763320
_version_ 1784869657822363648
author Kong, Erliang
Yuan, Chang
Li, Yongchang
Tian, Tian
He, Yan
Feng, Xudong
author_facet Kong, Erliang
Yuan, Chang
Li, Yongchang
Tian, Tian
He, Yan
Feng, Xudong
author_sort Kong, Erliang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Ischemia reperfusion injury greatly damages liver function and deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. This study is to compare the protective efficiency of direct and remote ischemic preconditioning (DIPC and RIPC) on ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. METHODS: 90 patients scheduled for partial hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly divided into control (n = 30), DIPC (n = 30), and RIPC (n = 30) groups. Baseline and surgery characteristics were collected, and ischemic preconditioning methods were carried out. Intraoperative hemodynamics, liver function and liver reserve capacity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses were measured, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was calculated finally. RESULTS: 10 patients were excluded from the study, and finally, the eligible patients in three groups were 27, 28, and 25, separately. No significant differences were observed in baseline and surgery characteristics among the three groups. SBP and DBP were significantly higher after hepatic portal vein occlusion while they were significantly lower after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group, SBP and DBP were of great fluctuation at different time points in the control group while they showed much more stabilization in the DIPC and RIPC groups. ALT, AST, and TBIL were significantly decreased on days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery, and ICG R15 was significantly decreased while ICG K value and EHBF were significantly increased on day 1 after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. Moreover, antioxidant enzyme SOD was increased, and inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β were decreased 24 hours after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. DIPC and RIPC also decreased hospital stays and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and hypertension. CONCLUSION: DIPC and RIPC both alleviated ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver and reduced perioperative complications with similar protective efficiency in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9840547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98405472023-01-15 Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy Kong, Erliang Yuan, Chang Li, Yongchang Tian, Tian He, Yan Feng, Xudong Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: Ischemia reperfusion injury greatly damages liver function and deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. This study is to compare the protective efficiency of direct and remote ischemic preconditioning (DIPC and RIPC) on ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. METHODS: 90 patients scheduled for partial hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly divided into control (n = 30), DIPC (n = 30), and RIPC (n = 30) groups. Baseline and surgery characteristics were collected, and ischemic preconditioning methods were carried out. Intraoperative hemodynamics, liver function and liver reserve capacity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses were measured, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was calculated finally. RESULTS: 10 patients were excluded from the study, and finally, the eligible patients in three groups were 27, 28, and 25, separately. No significant differences were observed in baseline and surgery characteristics among the three groups. SBP and DBP were significantly higher after hepatic portal vein occlusion while they were significantly lower after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group, SBP and DBP were of great fluctuation at different time points in the control group while they showed much more stabilization in the DIPC and RIPC groups. ALT, AST, and TBIL were significantly decreased on days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery, and ICG R15 was significantly decreased while ICG K value and EHBF were significantly increased on day 1 after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. Moreover, antioxidant enzyme SOD was increased, and inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β were decreased 24 hours after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. DIPC and RIPC also decreased hospital stays and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and hypertension. CONCLUSION: DIPC and RIPC both alleviated ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver and reduced perioperative complications with similar protective efficiency in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. Hindawi 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9840547/ /pubmed/36647546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2763320 Text en Copyright © 2023 Erliang Kong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kong, Erliang
Yuan, Chang
Li, Yongchang
Tian, Tian
He, Yan
Feng, Xudong
Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
title Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
title_full Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
title_fullStr Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
title_short Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
title_sort protective efficiency comparison of direct and remote ischemic preconditioning on ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2763320
work_keys_str_mv AT kongerliang protectiveefficiencycomparisonofdirectandremoteischemicpreconditioningonischemiareperfusioninjuryoftheliverinpatientsundergoingpartialhepatectomy
AT yuanchang protectiveefficiencycomparisonofdirectandremoteischemicpreconditioningonischemiareperfusioninjuryoftheliverinpatientsundergoingpartialhepatectomy
AT liyongchang protectiveefficiencycomparisonofdirectandremoteischemicpreconditioningonischemiareperfusioninjuryoftheliverinpatientsundergoingpartialhepatectomy
AT tiantian protectiveefficiencycomparisonofdirectandremoteischemicpreconditioningonischemiareperfusioninjuryoftheliverinpatientsundergoingpartialhepatectomy
AT heyan protectiveefficiencycomparisonofdirectandremoteischemicpreconditioningonischemiareperfusioninjuryoftheliverinpatientsundergoingpartialhepatectomy
AT fengxudong protectiveefficiencycomparisonofdirectandremoteischemicpreconditioningonischemiareperfusioninjuryoftheliverinpatientsundergoingpartialhepatectomy