Cargando…
Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05453-x |
_version_ | 1784869665127792640 |
---|---|
author | Ingebrigtsen, Tor Aune, Grethe Karlsen, Martine Eriksen Gulati, Sasha Kolstad, Frode Nygaard, Øystein P. Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu Solberg, Tore K. |
author_facet | Ingebrigtsen, Tor Aune, Grethe Karlsen, Martine Eriksen Gulati, Sasha Kolstad, Frode Nygaard, Øystein P. Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu Solberg, Tore K. |
author_sort | Ingebrigtsen, Tor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore aimed to examine whether clinical outcomes differed between respondents and non-respondents to standardized questionnaire-based 12-month follow-up. METHODS: All eight public and private providers of cervical spine surgery in Norway report to NORspine. We included 334 consecutive patients who were registered with surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the cervical spine in 2018 and did a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected register data and data on non-respondents’ outcomes collected by telephone interviews. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported change in arm pain assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were change in neck pain assessed with the NRS, change in health-related quality of life assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and patients’ perceived benefit of the operation assessed by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. RESULTS: At baseline, there were few and small differences between the 238 (71.3%) respondents and the 96 (28.7%) non-respondents. We reached 76 (79.2%) non-respondents by telephone, and 63 (65.6%) consented to an interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in change in NRS score for arm pain (3.26 (95% CI 2.84 to 3.69) points for respondents and 2.77 (1.92 to 3.63) points for telephone interviewees) or any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patients lost to follow-up were missing at random. Analyses of outcomes based on data from respondents can be considered representative for the complete register cohort, if patient characteristics associated with attrition are controlled for. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9840578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98405782023-01-16 Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) Ingebrigtsen, Tor Aune, Grethe Karlsen, Martine Eriksen Gulati, Sasha Kolstad, Frode Nygaard, Øystein P. Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu Solberg, Tore K. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine degenerative BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore aimed to examine whether clinical outcomes differed between respondents and non-respondents to standardized questionnaire-based 12-month follow-up. METHODS: All eight public and private providers of cervical spine surgery in Norway report to NORspine. We included 334 consecutive patients who were registered with surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the cervical spine in 2018 and did a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected register data and data on non-respondents’ outcomes collected by telephone interviews. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported change in arm pain assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were change in neck pain assessed with the NRS, change in health-related quality of life assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and patients’ perceived benefit of the operation assessed by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. RESULTS: At baseline, there were few and small differences between the 238 (71.3%) respondents and the 96 (28.7%) non-respondents. We reached 76 (79.2%) non-respondents by telephone, and 63 (65.6%) consented to an interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in change in NRS score for arm pain (3.26 (95% CI 2.84 to 3.69) points for respondents and 2.77 (1.92 to 3.63) points for telephone interviewees) or any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patients lost to follow-up were missing at random. Analyses of outcomes based on data from respondents can be considered representative for the complete register cohort, if patient characteristics associated with attrition are controlled for. Springer Vienna 2022-12-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9840578/ /pubmed/36539647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05453-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Spine degenerative Ingebrigtsen, Tor Aune, Grethe Karlsen, Martine Eriksen Gulati, Sasha Kolstad, Frode Nygaard, Øystein P. Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu Solberg, Tore K. Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) |
title | Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) |
title_full | Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) |
title_fullStr | Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) |
title_short | Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) |
title_sort | non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the norwegian registry for spine surgery (norspine) |
topic | Original Article - Spine degenerative |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05453-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingebrigtsentor nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT aunegrethe nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT karlsenmartineeriksen nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT gulatisasha nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT kolstadfrode nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT nygaardøysteinp nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT thyrhauganettemoltu nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine AT solbergtorek nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine |