Cargando…

Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingebrigtsen, Tor, Aune, Grethe, Karlsen, Martine Eriksen, Gulati, Sasha, Kolstad, Frode, Nygaard, Øystein P., Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu, Solberg, Tore K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05453-x
_version_ 1784869665127792640
author Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Aune, Grethe
Karlsen, Martine Eriksen
Gulati, Sasha
Kolstad, Frode
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu
Solberg, Tore K.
author_facet Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Aune, Grethe
Karlsen, Martine Eriksen
Gulati, Sasha
Kolstad, Frode
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu
Solberg, Tore K.
author_sort Ingebrigtsen, Tor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore aimed to examine whether clinical outcomes differed between respondents and non-respondents to standardized questionnaire-based 12-month follow-up. METHODS: All eight public and private providers of cervical spine surgery in Norway report to NORspine. We included 334 consecutive patients who were registered with surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the cervical spine in 2018 and did a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected register data and data on non-respondents’ outcomes collected by telephone interviews. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported change in arm pain assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were change in neck pain assessed with the NRS, change in health-related quality of life assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and patients’ perceived benefit of the operation assessed by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. RESULTS: At baseline, there were few and small differences between the 238 (71.3%) respondents and the 96 (28.7%) non-respondents. We reached 76 (79.2%) non-respondents by telephone, and 63 (65.6%) consented to an interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in change in NRS score for arm pain (3.26 (95% CI 2.84 to 3.69) points for respondents and 2.77 (1.92 to 3.63) points for telephone interviewees) or any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patients lost to follow-up were missing at random. Analyses of outcomes based on data from respondents can be considered representative for the complete register cohort, if patient characteristics associated with attrition are controlled for.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9840578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98405782023-01-16 Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) Ingebrigtsen, Tor Aune, Grethe Karlsen, Martine Eriksen Gulati, Sasha Kolstad, Frode Nygaard, Øystein P. Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu Solberg, Tore K. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine degenerative BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore aimed to examine whether clinical outcomes differed between respondents and non-respondents to standardized questionnaire-based 12-month follow-up. METHODS: All eight public and private providers of cervical spine surgery in Norway report to NORspine. We included 334 consecutive patients who were registered with surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the cervical spine in 2018 and did a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected register data and data on non-respondents’ outcomes collected by telephone interviews. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported change in arm pain assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were change in neck pain assessed with the NRS, change in health-related quality of life assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and patients’ perceived benefit of the operation assessed by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. RESULTS: At baseline, there were few and small differences between the 238 (71.3%) respondents and the 96 (28.7%) non-respondents. We reached 76 (79.2%) non-respondents by telephone, and 63 (65.6%) consented to an interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in change in NRS score for arm pain (3.26 (95% CI 2.84 to 3.69) points for respondents and 2.77 (1.92 to 3.63) points for telephone interviewees) or any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patients lost to follow-up were missing at random. Analyses of outcomes based on data from respondents can be considered representative for the complete register cohort, if patient characteristics associated with attrition are controlled for. Springer Vienna 2022-12-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9840578/ /pubmed/36539647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05453-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Spine degenerative
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Aune, Grethe
Karlsen, Martine Eriksen
Gulati, Sasha
Kolstad, Frode
Nygaard, Øystein P.
Thyrhaug, Anette Moltu
Solberg, Tore K.
Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
title Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
title_full Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
title_fullStr Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
title_full_unstemmed Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
title_short Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine)
title_sort non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the norwegian registry for spine surgery (norspine)
topic Original Article - Spine degenerative
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05453-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ingebrigtsentor nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT aunegrethe nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT karlsenmartineeriksen nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT gulatisasha nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT kolstadfrode nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT nygaardøysteinp nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT thyrhauganettemoltu nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine
AT solbergtorek nonrespondentsdonotbiasoutcomeassessmentaftercervicalspinesurgeryamulticenterobservationalstudyfromthenorwegianregistryforspinesurgerynorspine