Cargando…

Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease

BACKGROUND: The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) has recently been validated as an objective measure of functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Knowledge of factors influencing 5R-STS performance is useful to correct for confounders, create personalized ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klukowska, Anita M., Staartjes, Victor E., Vandertop, W. Peter, Schröder, Marc L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05441-1
_version_ 1784869667412639744
author Klukowska, Anita M.
Staartjes, Victor E.
Vandertop, W. Peter
Schröder, Marc L.
author_facet Klukowska, Anita M.
Staartjes, Victor E.
Vandertop, W. Peter
Schröder, Marc L.
author_sort Klukowska, Anita M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) has recently been validated as an objective measure of functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Knowledge of factors influencing 5R-STS performance is useful to correct for confounders, create personalized adjusted test times, and potentially identify prognostic subgroups. We evaluate factors predicting the 5R-STS performance in patients with LDD. METHODS: Patients with LDD requiring surgery were included. Each participant performed the 5R-STS and completed a questionnaire that included their age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, education level, employment type, ability to work, analgesic drug usage, history of previous spinal surgery, and EQ5D depression and anxiety domain. Surgical indication and index level of the spinal pathology were also recorded. Predictors of 5R-STS were identified through multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 240 patients, 47.9% being female (mean age, 47.7 ± 13.6 years). In the final multivariable model incorporating confounders, height (regression coefficient (RC), 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.003/0.16, p = 0.042) and being an active smoker (RC, 2.44; 95%CI, 0.56/4.32, p = 0.012) were significant predictors of worse 5R-STS performance. Full ability to work (RC, − 2.39; 95%CI, − 4.39/ − 0.39, p = 0.020) was associated with a better 5R-STS performance. Age, height, surgical indication, index level of pathology, history of previous spine surgery, history of pain, analgesic drug use, employment type, and severity of anxiety and depression symptoms demonstrated confounding effect on the 5R-STS time. CONCLUSIONS: Greater height, being an active smoker, and inability to work are significant predictors of worse 5R-STS performance in patients with LDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03303300 and NCT03321357. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-022-05441-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9840589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98405892023-01-16 Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease Klukowska, Anita M. Staartjes, Victor E. Vandertop, W. Peter Schröder, Marc L. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine degenerative BACKGROUND: The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) has recently been validated as an objective measure of functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Knowledge of factors influencing 5R-STS performance is useful to correct for confounders, create personalized adjusted test times, and potentially identify prognostic subgroups. We evaluate factors predicting the 5R-STS performance in patients with LDD. METHODS: Patients with LDD requiring surgery were included. Each participant performed the 5R-STS and completed a questionnaire that included their age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, education level, employment type, ability to work, analgesic drug usage, history of previous spinal surgery, and EQ5D depression and anxiety domain. Surgical indication and index level of the spinal pathology were also recorded. Predictors of 5R-STS were identified through multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 240 patients, 47.9% being female (mean age, 47.7 ± 13.6 years). In the final multivariable model incorporating confounders, height (regression coefficient (RC), 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.003/0.16, p = 0.042) and being an active smoker (RC, 2.44; 95%CI, 0.56/4.32, p = 0.012) were significant predictors of worse 5R-STS performance. Full ability to work (RC, − 2.39; 95%CI, − 4.39/ − 0.39, p = 0.020) was associated with a better 5R-STS performance. Age, height, surgical indication, index level of pathology, history of previous spine surgery, history of pain, analgesic drug use, employment type, and severity of anxiety and depression symptoms demonstrated confounding effect on the 5R-STS time. CONCLUSIONS: Greater height, being an active smoker, and inability to work are significant predictors of worse 5R-STS performance in patients with LDD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03303300 and NCT03321357. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-022-05441-1. Springer Vienna 2022-12-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9840589/ /pubmed/36477416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05441-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Spine degenerative
Klukowska, Anita M.
Staartjes, Victor E.
Vandertop, W. Peter
Schröder, Marc L.
Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
title Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
title_full Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
title_fullStr Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
title_short Predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
title_sort predictors of five-repetition sit-to-stand test performance in patients with lumbar degenerative disease
topic Original Article - Spine degenerative
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05441-1
work_keys_str_mv AT klukowskaanitam predictorsoffiverepetitionsittostandtestperformanceinpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT staartjesvictore predictorsoffiverepetitionsittostandtestperformanceinpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT vandertopwpeter predictorsoffiverepetitionsittostandtestperformanceinpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease
AT schrodermarcl predictorsoffiverepetitionsittostandtestperformanceinpatientswithlumbardegenerativedisease