Cargando…
A Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Effectiveness of 4% Articaine vs 0.5% Bupivacaine for Lower Molar Tooth Extraction
Background:Safe and efficient pain control is essential for today's dental practice. This randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine with 4% articaine in lower molar tooth extraction. Methods:One hundred subjects were classified into two groups,...
Autores principales: | Tenglikar, Pavan, Manas, Abhigyan, Sahoo, Amiya Ranjan, Bhoi, Shreedevi, Singh, Arundhati, Patil, Prajakta B, B, Anuradha |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654637 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32611 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Adrenaline and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in the Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar
por: Deshpande, Nupoor, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
por: Jaiswal, Pooja, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction
por: Pellicer-Chover, Hilario, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
por: Tokuç, Berkay, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Bupivacaine 0.5 % versus articaine 4 % for the removal of lower
third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial
por: Sancho-Puchades, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2012)