Cargando…

R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE: Accurate cachexia staging is the key to its management. However, there is currently a lack of tools to distinguish the staging of cachexia in patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy. The Radiotherapy Cachexia Staging Scale (R–CSS) was developed for the stratification of cachexia in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Hanxiao, Wang, Yang, Liang, Qunying, Li, Xiaolan, Chen, Changlong, Mao, Xiaoqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36655012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100164
_version_ 1784869782888120320
author Yi, Hanxiao
Wang, Yang
Liang, Qunying
Li, Xiaolan
Chen, Changlong
Mao, Xiaoqun
author_facet Yi, Hanxiao
Wang, Yang
Liang, Qunying
Li, Xiaolan
Chen, Changlong
Mao, Xiaoqun
author_sort Yi, Hanxiao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Accurate cachexia staging is the key to its management. However, there is currently a lack of tools to distinguish the staging of cachexia in patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy. The Radiotherapy Cachexia Staging Scale (R–CSS) was developed for the stratification of cachexia in patients undergoing cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy were divided into four stages – noncachexia, precachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia – by the R–CSS scale, and the clinical outcomes of the four groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy were included in the study. All participants were classified into four stages of cachexia: stage 0, I, II, and III. Patients with a higher cachexia stage had a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (P ​= ​0.015). Scores on the 16-item M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory were higher in patients with higher cachexia stages (P ​< ​0.05), but levels of forgetfulness, numbness, and shortness of breath were not higher in these patients (P ​> ​0.05). Patients with higher cachexia stages exhibited better scores on the QLQ-C30 scale (P ​< ​0.05), except for in the domains of cognitive functioning, diarrhea, and dyspnea (P ​> ​0.05). The incidence of treatment-related events (any grade III or higher grade of [non-]hematologic adverse events, the need for hospitalization, emergency room admission) was higher in patients with higher cachexia stages. CONCLUSIONS: The R–CSS scale is a screening tool that can simultaneously distinguish different stages of cachexia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9841216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98412162023-01-17 R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy Yi, Hanxiao Wang, Yang Liang, Qunying Li, Xiaolan Chen, Changlong Mao, Xiaoqun Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Original Article OBJECTIVE: Accurate cachexia staging is the key to its management. However, there is currently a lack of tools to distinguish the staging of cachexia in patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy. The Radiotherapy Cachexia Staging Scale (R–CSS) was developed for the stratification of cachexia in patients undergoing cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients with cancer undergoing radiotherapy were divided into four stages – noncachexia, precachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia – by the R–CSS scale, and the clinical outcomes of the four groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy were included in the study. All participants were classified into four stages of cachexia: stage 0, I, II, and III. Patients with a higher cachexia stage had a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (P ​= ​0.015). Scores on the 16-item M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory were higher in patients with higher cachexia stages (P ​< ​0.05), but levels of forgetfulness, numbness, and shortness of breath were not higher in these patients (P ​> ​0.05). Patients with higher cachexia stages exhibited better scores on the QLQ-C30 scale (P ​< ​0.05), except for in the domains of cognitive functioning, diarrhea, and dyspnea (P ​> ​0.05). The incidence of treatment-related events (any grade III or higher grade of [non-]hematologic adverse events, the need for hospitalization, emergency room admission) was higher in patients with higher cachexia stages. CONCLUSIONS: The R–CSS scale is a screening tool that can simultaneously distinguish different stages of cachexia. Elsevier 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9841216/ /pubmed/36655012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100164 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yi, Hanxiao
Wang, Yang
Liang, Qunying
Li, Xiaolan
Chen, Changlong
Mao, Xiaoqun
R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short R–CSS: A clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort r–css: a clinically applicable score to classify cachexia stages in patients with cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36655012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100164
work_keys_str_mv AT yihanxiao rcssaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinpatientswithcancerundergoingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT wangyang rcssaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinpatientswithcancerundergoingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT liangqunying rcssaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinpatientswithcancerundergoingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT lixiaolan rcssaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinpatientswithcancerundergoingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT chenchanglong rcssaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinpatientswithcancerundergoingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT maoxiaoqun rcssaclinicallyapplicablescoretoclassifycachexiastagesinpatientswithcancerundergoingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy