Cargando…
Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach
BACKGROUND: Electronic consultation (eConsult) programs are crucial components of modern healthcare that facilitate communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists. eConsults between PCPs and specialists. They also provide a unique opportunity to use real-world patient scenarios...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01948-9 |
_version_ | 1784869890611478528 |
---|---|
author | Archibald, Douglas Grant, Rachel Tuot, Delphine S. Liddy, Clare Sewell, Justin L. Price, David W. Grad, Roland Shipman, Scott A. Campbell, Craig Guglani, Sheena Wood, Timothy J. Keely, Erin |
author_facet | Archibald, Douglas Grant, Rachel Tuot, Delphine S. Liddy, Clare Sewell, Justin L. Price, David W. Grad, Roland Shipman, Scott A. Campbell, Craig Guglani, Sheena Wood, Timothy J. Keely, Erin |
author_sort | Archibald, Douglas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic consultation (eConsult) programs are crucial components of modern healthcare that facilitate communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists. eConsults between PCPs and specialists. They also provide a unique opportunity to use real-world patient scenarios for reflective learning as part of professional development. However, tools that guide and document learning from eConsults are limited. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot two eConsult reflective learning tools (RLTs), one for PCPs and one for specialists, for those participating in eConsults. METHODS: We performed a four-phase pragmatic mixed methods study recruiting PCPs and specialists from two public health systems located in two countries: eConsult BASE in Canada and San Francisco Health Network eConsult in the United States. In phase 1, subject matter experts developed preliminary RLTs for PCPs and specialists. During phase 2, a Delphi survey among 20 PCPs and 16 specialists led to consensus on items for each RLT. In phase 3, we conducted cognitive interviews with three PCPs and five specialists as they applied the RLTs on previously completed consults. In phase 4, we piloted the RLTs with eConsult users. RESULTS: The RLTs were perceived to elicit critical reflection among participants regarding their knowledge and practice habits and could be used for quality improvement and continuing professional development. CONCLUSION: PCPs and specialists alike perceived that eConsult systems provided opportunities for self-directed learning wherein they were motivated to investigate topics further through the course of eConsult exchanges. We recommend the RLTs be subject to further evaluation through implementation studies at other sites. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01948-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9841624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98416242023-01-17 Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach Archibald, Douglas Grant, Rachel Tuot, Delphine S. Liddy, Clare Sewell, Justin L. Price, David W. Grad, Roland Shipman, Scott A. Campbell, Craig Guglani, Sheena Wood, Timothy J. Keely, Erin BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Electronic consultation (eConsult) programs are crucial components of modern healthcare that facilitate communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists. eConsults between PCPs and specialists. They also provide a unique opportunity to use real-world patient scenarios for reflective learning as part of professional development. However, tools that guide and document learning from eConsults are limited. The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot two eConsult reflective learning tools (RLTs), one for PCPs and one for specialists, for those participating in eConsults. METHODS: We performed a four-phase pragmatic mixed methods study recruiting PCPs and specialists from two public health systems located in two countries: eConsult BASE in Canada and San Francisco Health Network eConsult in the United States. In phase 1, subject matter experts developed preliminary RLTs for PCPs and specialists. During phase 2, a Delphi survey among 20 PCPs and 16 specialists led to consensus on items for each RLT. In phase 3, we conducted cognitive interviews with three PCPs and five specialists as they applied the RLTs on previously completed consults. In phase 4, we piloted the RLTs with eConsult users. RESULTS: The RLTs were perceived to elicit critical reflection among participants regarding their knowledge and practice habits and could be used for quality improvement and continuing professional development. CONCLUSION: PCPs and specialists alike perceived that eConsult systems provided opportunities for self-directed learning wherein they were motivated to investigate topics further through the course of eConsult exchanges. We recommend the RLTs be subject to further evaluation through implementation studies at other sites. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01948-9. BioMed Central 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9841624/ /pubmed/36647016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01948-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Archibald, Douglas Grant, Rachel Tuot, Delphine S. Liddy, Clare Sewell, Justin L. Price, David W. Grad, Roland Shipman, Scott A. Campbell, Craig Guglani, Sheena Wood, Timothy J. Keely, Erin Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
title | Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
title_full | Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
title_fullStr | Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
title_short | Development of eConsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
title_sort | development of econsult reflective learning tools for healthcare providers: a pragmatic mixed methods approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01948-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT archibalddouglas developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT grantrachel developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT tuotdelphines developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT liddyclare developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT sewelljustinl developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT pricedavidw developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT gradroland developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT shipmanscotta developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT campbellcraig developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT guglanisheena developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT woodtimothyj developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach AT keelyerin developmentofeconsultreflectivelearningtoolsforhealthcareprovidersapragmaticmixedmethodsapproach |