Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z |
_version_ | 1784869904876306432 |
---|---|
author | Isla, Dolores Lopez-Brea, Marta Espinosa, María Arrabal, Natalia Pérez-Parente, Diego Carcedo, David Bernabé-Caro, Reyes |
author_facet | Isla, Dolores Lopez-Brea, Marta Espinosa, María Arrabal, Natalia Pérez-Parente, Diego Carcedo, David Bernabé-Caro, Reyes |
author_sort | Isla, Dolores |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept’18 and Feb’20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept’18 cut-off and − 0.80 and − 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb’20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ − 54,261 with Sept’18 cut-off and € − 81,907 with Feb’20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9841669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98416692023-01-17 Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain Isla, Dolores Lopez-Brea, Marta Espinosa, María Arrabal, Natalia Pérez-Parente, Diego Carcedo, David Bernabé-Caro, Reyes Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept’18 and Feb’20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept’18 cut-off and − 0.80 and − 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb’20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ − 54,261 with Sept’18 cut-off and € − 81,907 with Feb’20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z. BioMed Central 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9841669/ /pubmed/36647072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Isla, Dolores Lopez-Brea, Marta Espinosa, María Arrabal, Natalia Pérez-Parente, Diego Carcedo, David Bernabé-Caro, Reyes Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain |
title | Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in pd-l1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in spain |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isladolores costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain AT lopezbreamarta costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain AT espinosamaria costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain AT arrabalnatalia costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain AT perezparentediego costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain AT carcedodavid costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain AT bernabecaroreyes costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain |