Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isla, Dolores, Lopez-Brea, Marta, Espinosa, María, Arrabal, Natalia, Pérez-Parente, Diego, Carcedo, David, Bernabé-Caro, Reyes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z
_version_ 1784869904876306432
author Isla, Dolores
Lopez-Brea, Marta
Espinosa, María
Arrabal, Natalia
Pérez-Parente, Diego
Carcedo, David
Bernabé-Caro, Reyes
author_facet Isla, Dolores
Lopez-Brea, Marta
Espinosa, María
Arrabal, Natalia
Pérez-Parente, Diego
Carcedo, David
Bernabé-Caro, Reyes
author_sort Isla, Dolores
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept’18 and Feb’20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept’18 cut-off and − 0.80 and − 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb’20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ − 54,261 with Sept’18 cut-off and € − 81,907 with Feb’20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9841669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98416692023-01-17 Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain Isla, Dolores Lopez-Brea, Marta Espinosa, María Arrabal, Natalia Pérez-Parente, Diego Carcedo, David Bernabé-Caro, Reyes Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept’18 and Feb’20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept’18 cut-off and − 0.80 and − 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb’20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ − 54,261 with Sept’18 cut-off and € − 81,907 with Feb’20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z. BioMed Central 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9841669/ /pubmed/36647072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Isla, Dolores
Lopez-Brea, Marta
Espinosa, María
Arrabal, Natalia
Pérez-Parente, Diego
Carcedo, David
Bernabé-Caro, Reyes
Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
title Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
title_full Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
title_short Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Spain
title_sort cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in pd-l1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in spain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00417-z
work_keys_str_mv AT isladolores costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain
AT lopezbreamarta costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain
AT espinosamaria costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain
AT arrabalnatalia costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain
AT perezparentediego costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain
AT carcedodavid costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain
AT bernabecaroreyes costeffectivenessofatezolizumabversuspembrolizumabasfirstlinetreatmentinpdl1positiveadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerinspain