Cargando…
Prognostic significance of preoperative serum tumor markers in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach (HAS)
BACKGROUND: The role of preoperative serum tumor markers in HAS patients was vague, we designed the study to explore the effect of preoperative serum tumor markers on predicting the prognosis of HAS patients. METHODS: A total of 139 patients were included according to the different tumor makers. X-t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10516-y |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The role of preoperative serum tumor markers in HAS patients was vague, we designed the study to explore the effect of preoperative serum tumor markers on predicting the prognosis of HAS patients. METHODS: A total of 139 patients were included according to the different tumor makers. X-tile tool was employed to identify the optimal cut-off values of respective tumor makers. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine independent risk factors. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for 3-years overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 516 ng/mL. Patients with high-level AFP values assumed significantly worse OS and RFS than those with low-level AFP values (P = 0.028 and P = 0.011, respectively). The optimal cut-off value of Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19–9 for OS and RFS was 51.3 U/mL. And the survival results were similar with AFP in the aspects of OS and RFS (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that high serum AFP was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS of HAS patients (HR7.264; 95% CI 1.328–39.738; P = 0.022 and HR 2.688; 95% CI 0.922–7.836; P = 0.070, respectively). CA19–9 could perform as a fair substitute to predict the HAS patients’ OS and RFS when the preoperative serum AFP was unavailable (HR 7.816; 95% CI 2.084–29.308; P = 0.002 and HR 4.386; 95% CI 1.824–10.547; P = 0.001, respectively). Other tumor markers didn’t present significant influences. CONCLUSIONS: Applying preoperative serum AFP level to predict the HAS patients’ prognosis is feasible and preoperative serum high-AFP is an independent risk factor for OS and RFS of HAS patients. Preoperative serum CA19–9 could be an alternative choice when AFP was absent. |
---|