Cargando…
Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Conservative treatments including bracing and exercise therapy are prescribed on the first-line in adults with degenerative scoliosis. However, adherence to conservative treatments is low. We aimed to assess barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scolios...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06111-0 |
_version_ | 1784869932490555392 |
---|---|
author | Dureigne, Flora Chagnas, Marie-Ombeline Roren, Alexandra Couzi, Emmanuel Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine Moreau, Sylvain Nicol, Vanina Rannou, François Daste, Camille Nguyen, Christelle |
author_facet | Dureigne, Flora Chagnas, Marie-Ombeline Roren, Alexandra Couzi, Emmanuel Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine Moreau, Sylvain Nicol, Vanina Rannou, François Daste, Camille Nguyen, Christelle |
author_sort | Dureigne, Flora |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conservative treatments including bracing and exercise therapy are prescribed on the first-line in adults with degenerative scoliosis. However, adherence to conservative treatments is low. We aimed to assess barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis. METHODS: We conducted a single-centred mixed-method pilot and feasibility study. All patients scheduled for a multidisciplinary custom-made bracing consultation, from July 2019 to January 2020, in a French tertiary care centre, were screened. Patients were eligible if they had painful adult degenerative scoliosis and a prescription for a rigid custom-made lumbar-sacral orthosis. The primary outcome was barriers and facilitators to bracing assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes were back pain, spine-specific activity limitations, symptoms of depression and satisfaction with bracing post-intervention assessed by a quantitative approach. RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients were screened and 14 (25%) were included. Mean age was 68.2 (12.3) years. Mean follow-up was 9.8 (2.0) months. Barriers to bracing were increased limitations in some activities, discomfort in hot weather and burden of aesthetic appearance. Facilitators to bracing were reduced pain, improved activities of daily living, suitable weight and improved spinal alignment. Participants self-implemented solutions to enhance adherence. The mean reduction from baseline in pain intensity was 1.7 (2.3) of 10 points, and 6 of 13 patients (46%) had pain intensity < 4 of 10 points. CONCLUSION: Bracing is a feasible intervention for people with painful adult degenerative scoliosis. Patients self-implemented their own solutions to enhance adherence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-06111-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9841704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98417042023-01-17 Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study Dureigne, Flora Chagnas, Marie-Ombeline Roren, Alexandra Couzi, Emmanuel Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine Moreau, Sylvain Nicol, Vanina Rannou, François Daste, Camille Nguyen, Christelle BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Conservative treatments including bracing and exercise therapy are prescribed on the first-line in adults with degenerative scoliosis. However, adherence to conservative treatments is low. We aimed to assess barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis. METHODS: We conducted a single-centred mixed-method pilot and feasibility study. All patients scheduled for a multidisciplinary custom-made bracing consultation, from July 2019 to January 2020, in a French tertiary care centre, were screened. Patients were eligible if they had painful adult degenerative scoliosis and a prescription for a rigid custom-made lumbar-sacral orthosis. The primary outcome was barriers and facilitators to bracing assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes were back pain, spine-specific activity limitations, symptoms of depression and satisfaction with bracing post-intervention assessed by a quantitative approach. RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients were screened and 14 (25%) were included. Mean age was 68.2 (12.3) years. Mean follow-up was 9.8 (2.0) months. Barriers to bracing were increased limitations in some activities, discomfort in hot weather and burden of aesthetic appearance. Facilitators to bracing were reduced pain, improved activities of daily living, suitable weight and improved spinal alignment. Participants self-implemented solutions to enhance adherence. The mean reduction from baseline in pain intensity was 1.7 (2.3) of 10 points, and 6 of 13 patients (46%) had pain intensity < 4 of 10 points. CONCLUSION: Bracing is a feasible intervention for people with painful adult degenerative scoliosis. Patients self-implemented their own solutions to enhance adherence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-06111-0. BioMed Central 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9841704/ /pubmed/36647098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06111-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dureigne, Flora Chagnas, Marie-Ombeline Roren, Alexandra Couzi, Emmanuel Lefèvre-Colau, Marie-Martine Moreau, Sylvain Nicol, Vanina Rannou, François Daste, Camille Nguyen, Christelle Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
title | Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
title_full | Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
title_short | Barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
title_sort | barriers and facilitators to bracing in adults with painful degenerative scoliosis: a single-centred mixed-method feasibility study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06111-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dureigneflora barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT chagnasmarieombeline barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT rorenalexandra barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT couziemmanuel barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT lefevrecolaumariemartine barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT moreausylvain barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT nicolvanina barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT rannoufrancois barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT dastecamille barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy AT nguyenchristelle barriersandfacilitatorstobracinginadultswithpainfuldegenerativescoliosisasinglecentredmixedmethodfeasibilitystudy |