Cargando…

Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Leo, Annemarie, Bloxsome, Dianne, Bayes, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3
_version_ 1784869953511358464
author De Leo, Annemarie
Bloxsome, Dianne
Bayes, Sara
author_facet De Leo, Annemarie
Bloxsome, Dianne
Bayes, Sara
author_sort De Leo, Annemarie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patients while containing healthcare costs and reducing variability in clinical practice. However, this has inadvertently led to discrepancies in CPG recommendations between health organisations, also challenging healthcare providers who rely on these for decision-making and to inform clinical care. From a global perspective, although some countries have initiated national protocols regarding developing, appraising and implementing high-quality CPGs, there remains no standardised approach to any aspect of CPG production. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature and document analysis were conducted according to Joanna Brigg’s Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This comprised two qualitative methods: a comprehensive review of the literature (using CINAHL, Scopus and PubMeD) and a document analysis of all national and international guideline development processes (manual search of health-related websites, national/international organisational health policies and documents). RESULTS: A set of clear principles and processes were identified as crucial to CPG development, informing the planning, implementation and dissemination of recommendations. Fundamentally, two common goals were reported: to improve the quality and consistency of clinical practice (patient care) and to reduce the duplication or ratification of low-grade CPGs. CONCLUSIONS: Consultation and communication between CPG working parties, including a wide range of representatives (including professional organisations, regional and local offices, and relevant national bodies) is essential. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of standardising the approach and disseminating the recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9841716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98417162023-01-17 Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis De Leo, Annemarie Bloxsome, Dianne Bayes, Sara BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patients while containing healthcare costs and reducing variability in clinical practice. However, this has inadvertently led to discrepancies in CPG recommendations between health organisations, also challenging healthcare providers who rely on these for decision-making and to inform clinical care. From a global perspective, although some countries have initiated national protocols regarding developing, appraising and implementing high-quality CPGs, there remains no standardised approach to any aspect of CPG production. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature and document analysis were conducted according to Joanna Brigg’s Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This comprised two qualitative methods: a comprehensive review of the literature (using CINAHL, Scopus and PubMeD) and a document analysis of all national and international guideline development processes (manual search of health-related websites, national/international organisational health policies and documents). RESULTS: A set of clear principles and processes were identified as crucial to CPG development, informing the planning, implementation and dissemination of recommendations. Fundamentally, two common goals were reported: to improve the quality and consistency of clinical practice (patient care) and to reduce the duplication or ratification of low-grade CPGs. CONCLUSIONS: Consultation and communication between CPG working parties, including a wide range of representatives (including professional organisations, regional and local offices, and relevant national bodies) is essential. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of standardising the approach and disseminating the recommendations. BioMed Central 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9841716/ /pubmed/36647085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
De Leo, Annemarie
Bloxsome, Dianne
Bayes, Sara
Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
title Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
title_full Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
title_fullStr Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
title_short Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
title_sort approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3
work_keys_str_mv AT deleoannemarie approachestoclinicalguidelinedevelopmentinhealthcareascopingreviewanddocumentanalysis
AT bloxsomedianne approachestoclinicalguidelinedevelopmentinhealthcareascopingreviewanddocumentanalysis
AT bayessara approachestoclinicalguidelinedevelopmentinhealthcareascopingreviewanddocumentanalysis