Cargando…
Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patien...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3 |
_version_ | 1784869953511358464 |
---|---|
author | De Leo, Annemarie Bloxsome, Dianne Bayes, Sara |
author_facet | De Leo, Annemarie Bloxsome, Dianne Bayes, Sara |
author_sort | De Leo, Annemarie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patients while containing healthcare costs and reducing variability in clinical practice. However, this has inadvertently led to discrepancies in CPG recommendations between health organisations, also challenging healthcare providers who rely on these for decision-making and to inform clinical care. From a global perspective, although some countries have initiated national protocols regarding developing, appraising and implementing high-quality CPGs, there remains no standardised approach to any aspect of CPG production. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature and document analysis were conducted according to Joanna Brigg’s Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This comprised two qualitative methods: a comprehensive review of the literature (using CINAHL, Scopus and PubMeD) and a document analysis of all national and international guideline development processes (manual search of health-related websites, national/international organisational health policies and documents). RESULTS: A set of clear principles and processes were identified as crucial to CPG development, informing the planning, implementation and dissemination of recommendations. Fundamentally, two common goals were reported: to improve the quality and consistency of clinical practice (patient care) and to reduce the duplication or ratification of low-grade CPGs. CONCLUSIONS: Consultation and communication between CPG working parties, including a wide range of representatives (including professional organisations, regional and local offices, and relevant national bodies) is essential. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of standardising the approach and disseminating the recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9841716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98417162023-01-17 Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis De Leo, Annemarie Bloxsome, Dianne Bayes, Sara BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patients while containing healthcare costs and reducing variability in clinical practice. However, this has inadvertently led to discrepancies in CPG recommendations between health organisations, also challenging healthcare providers who rely on these for decision-making and to inform clinical care. From a global perspective, although some countries have initiated national protocols regarding developing, appraising and implementing high-quality CPGs, there remains no standardised approach to any aspect of CPG production. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature and document analysis were conducted according to Joanna Brigg’s Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This comprised two qualitative methods: a comprehensive review of the literature (using CINAHL, Scopus and PubMeD) and a document analysis of all national and international guideline development processes (manual search of health-related websites, national/international organisational health policies and documents). RESULTS: A set of clear principles and processes were identified as crucial to CPG development, informing the planning, implementation and dissemination of recommendations. Fundamentally, two common goals were reported: to improve the quality and consistency of clinical practice (patient care) and to reduce the duplication or ratification of low-grade CPGs. CONCLUSIONS: Consultation and communication between CPG working parties, including a wide range of representatives (including professional organisations, regional and local offices, and relevant national bodies) is essential. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of standardising the approach and disseminating the recommendations. BioMed Central 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9841716/ /pubmed/36647085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research De Leo, Annemarie Bloxsome, Dianne Bayes, Sara Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
title | Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
title_full | Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
title_fullStr | Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
title_short | Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
title_sort | approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deleoannemarie approachestoclinicalguidelinedevelopmentinhealthcareascopingreviewanddocumentanalysis AT bloxsomedianne approachestoclinicalguidelinedevelopmentinhealthcareascopingreviewanddocumentanalysis AT bayessara approachestoclinicalguidelinedevelopmentinhealthcareascopingreviewanddocumentanalysis |